• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Personal Finance for PhDs

Live a financially balanced life - no Real Job required

  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Beyond the Broke Graduate Student
  • Tax Center
  • PhD Home Loans
  • Work with Emily
  • About Emily Roberts

podcast

This Postbac Fellow Saves 30% of Her Income through Simple Living and a SciComm Side Hustle

February 25, 2019 by Jewel Lipps

In this episode, Emily interviews Maya Gosztyla, a postbac fellow at the National Institutes of Health in Rockville, MD who saves approximately 30% of her income from her stipend and freelance science writing income. Her goals for funding her PhD program applications and upcoming move to grad school and wedding motivate her to keep her expenses low and sustain her side hustle. Maya gives great financial advice for PhDs in transition into and out of grad school.

Links mentioned in episode

  • Tax Center for PhDs-in-Training 
  • Volunteer as a Guest for the Podcast
  • Gradblogger Connect 
  • How Much Tax will I owe on My Fellowship Stipend or Salary?
  • Quarterly Estimated Tax Workshop

postbac savings rate

0:00 Introduction

1:15 Please Introduce Yourself

Maya Gosztyla graduated in May 2018 from Ohio State. She majored in Neuroscience and Molecular Genetics. She started as a postbac at National Institutes of Health (NIH) right after graduation. She is mainly focused on drug discovery research. Her interests are in neurodegenerative diseases in particular. She is applying to PhD programs, with intent to begin her PhD program in Fall 2019. Maya is relieved that she does not have to balance undergraduate coursework with time spent on graduate applications. She also has more time for the interview weekends, which Emily says can be a fun experience.

2:33 What is your income? Where do you work and live?

Maya’s postbac annual salary is $30,000. She works at NIH location in Rockville, Maryland. The cost of living in this location is fairly high, because she is in the Washington DC metro area.

3:26 What was your financial situation coming into your postbac position?

Maya didn’t have any student loans. She says she treated filling out scholarship applications like a full time job, so she was able to fund her entire junior and senior years of undergraduate education. She didn’t spend all of her scholarship stipend during senior year. She has emergency savings fund of about $7,000 since she graduated from college.

4:25 Do you apply the same mindset from your undergraduate scholarships to your graduate school fellowship applications?

Maya says she has been applying to many graduate school fellowships. She applied to the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP), the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG), and one example of a school specific fellowship is the Knight-Hennessy Scholars at Stanford University. In addition to her graduate school applications, she has been sending in many applications to go after award money in full force. Emily assures that this strategy is a great idea, because you are certain that you will get paid for your graduate work.

5:58 Where did you move from? How did you manage your finances during your move?

Maya’s rent during college was $350 per month. In Rockville Maryland, her rent is $850 per month. Maya says what helped her most during her move was making a really detailed budget. She used several cost of living calculator websites. Additionally, she doesn’t have tax withdrawn from her postbac stipend, so she had to estimate quarterly tax.

She was in shock when she moved from the inexpensive Ohio city to the much more expensive DC area. She thought she needed to spend as little as humanly possible. For instance, she first moved into a bedroom in a three bedroom apartment. Her portion of the rent was $700 per month, which is the cheapest she could find in the area. She had an hour long commute, and she had to leave the apartment because of a cockroach infestation. Maya advises that people not to choose the cheapest apartment, but to take into account other factors. She says it can be worth more rent money to be closer to work for a shorter commute, and to live in a quality apartment.

Maya used cost of living calculators to get a sense of the maximum expenses she would have in the DC area. She says she spends less than suggested by the calculators. She talked to people who are in the NIH postbac program, because these are people in her age group and income level. At this early career stage, people are willing to share information about income and rent.

10:04 What is your savings rate? How are you saving this amount each month?

Maya is averaging around 30% of her gross income, pre-tax, going into savings. She emphasizes the importance of setting targets and timelines for what she is saving for. One of her specific goals was to pay for PhD program applications, which was well over $1000. She wanted to start an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), since she’s not sure she can have an IRA while she’s in graduate school. Another financial goal is to get married next summer! With her partner, she wants to take a couple of weeks vacation in Europe. She wants to do all of this without tapping into her emergency fund, because she wants to use this fund for her move to graduate school.

Maya has several frugal strategies. She doesn’t have a car, which is unnecessary in DC and major cities. She takes a bus to work, which she says is reliable. NIH will pay for public transit, so she gets reimbursed for her bus expenses. Maya says eating out is really expensive. She cooks almost all of her meals, and she meal preps. She goes out to eat with friends, as a social experience, it’s important to eat food to bond with people. This happens two to three times a month, and they don’t go out for drinks that much either. She views her eating out expenses as paying for access to space and people, and eating food isn’t the purpose. She set a rule for herself that she won’t eat out alone.

She goes to work, gets groceries, finds free stuff to do, and she doesn’t spend on entertainment. Also, she has a side source of income. Maya does science writing as a freelancer. It’s not easy work, but it’s not incredibly technical. She can pick and choose when and what kind of assignments she wants to accept.

15:27 How did you get connected to opportunities for freelance science writing?

Maya started a blog about Alzheimer’s Disease while she was in college. She wasn’t making money from the blog, but she started getting cold emails from people who liked her writing who would commission her for articles. She uses Upward, the freelancing website to find clients. Upward has a fee of 30% from every writing, so she charges more to make sure she doesn’t undercharge for her work.

Emily recommends the academic blogging network on Facebook (now called Gradblogger Connect) as a great resource for people interested in blogging and podcasts.

She doesn’t see science writing as her career. The variable income makes her feel anxious. She’d like to keep writing on the side, because she believes it is important for scientists to write about research for the public. Emily says that a side hustle during the PhD training is useful to figure out if this is what you want to do for your career.

20:37 Do you consider yourself having a financially quiet life?

Maya says that she applies a KonMari method to her purchases. She asks herself questions like, “will getting take out actually make me happier?” She does spend money on flights, because her fiancé lives in Ohio and she travels to see him. Maya observes that people spend money because they feel like they have to. She says it’s not a sacrifice for her to not go out every weekend, because she doesn’t really like alcohol. Emily says that it’s very interesting to apply Marie Kondo’s method to finances, and ask “does this spark joy?” Maya has gone through the introspection to consider what is bringing her high value. When you have low income, you can’t just default to the kind of consumerism you see around you.

23:30 Have you started thinking about how you’ll financially manage the transition to graduate school?

Maya is applying to high cost of living areas, so she feels more prepared for that move. Since she’s lived in the DC area, she will have a better idea of expense in places like Boston and San Francisco. She’s trying not to touch her emergency fund, because she needs it for her moving expenses. She is also trying to make sure that fiancé and her are comfortable in their current low income lifestyle, she wants to avoid the lifestyle creep. Graduate school will be a transition, but Maya will also experience the life transition of combining her lives with her partner.

25:02 Do you have any advice for someone looking at a transition out of college or into graduate school?

Maya says the first thing you have to do is look at what you have and where do you want to be in a month, or year. There is no way to set a savings rate if you don’t have something you’re aiming for. She gives the example that she wanted to save $4,000 for their honeymoon, then she could create a budget with that goal in mind.

She also says don’t forget about taxes. She had lab mates who didn’t know this. They weren’t setting aside money for tax season, and ended up owing. She says you can set up a separate savings account to set aside taxes. Emily says that this blindsides a lot of people. She has created resources on her website to help people estimate their quarterly tax.

Maya says you need to buy things that actually make you happy. She offers the caveat that if something is actually important, like you don’t need to get the cheapest apartment, get one you want. You can keep stock of what you actually care about. Maya wonders if people really know the taste of expensive wine, for example, or if it’s more about expectations. Emily says we may need to shuck the expectations. You have to figure out if something is right for you, if it “sparks joy” for you, and it’s not an expectation that others put on you. Maya says that others don’t pay attention.

Finally, Maya says to keep a really detailed spreadsheet. She used to use Mint, but now she uses a manual spreadsheet, and inputs once a week. She customizes it for her needs.

30:47 Conclusion

Using Data to Improve the Postdoc Experience (Including Salary and Benefits)

February 11, 2019 by Jewel Lipps

In this episode, Emily interview Dr. Gary McDowell, the executive director of Future of Research. Future of Research is an advocacy organization that uses data to empower early-career researchers. Gary outlines the ongoing work at Future of Research before diving into the details of their recently published study on postdoc salaries. Emily and Gary discuss the complexities around categorizing and counting postdocs as well as the interesting results from the data Future of Research acquired by Freedom of Information Act requests. Current postdocs can contribute to this ongoing project by submitting their salary and benefits data to the Postdoc Salaries database.

Links mentioned in episode

  • Tax Center for PhDs-in-Training
  • Volunteer as a Guest for the Podcast
  • Future of Research
  • Paper: Assessing the landscape of US postdoctoral salaries
  • Nature News “Pay for US postdocs varies wildly by institution” 
  • PostdocSalaries.com
  • PhDStipends.com

postdoc salaries

Teaser

Gary (00:00): We actually found that the median salary for all postdocs across the US, regardless of field, was actually pegged to the minimum National Institutes of Health National Research Service award stipend.

Introduction

Emily (00:18): Welcome to the Personal Finance for PhDs podcast, a higher Education in personal finance. I’m your host, Emily Roberts. This is season two, episode three, and today my guest is Dr. Gary McDowell, the Executive Director of Future of Research, an advocacy organization that uses data to empower early career researchers. Gary shares results from future research’s, recently published study on postdoc salary data gathered through FOIA requests. We also discuss how prospective postdocs can properly evaluate and negotiate their postdoc job offers. Current postdocs can contribute to this ongoing project by entering their salary and benefits data to the database at postdocsalaries.com. Without further ado, here’s my interview with Gary McDowell. Today on the podcast I have Gary McDowell from Future of Research, and we are going to be discussing postdoc salaries. Uh, they have just wrapped up or well wrapped up a milestone in an ongoing project, and we’ll be discussing that. So, Gary, please, you know, tell us a bit more about yourself and about future of research.

Will You Please Introduce Yourself Further?

Gary (01:25): Sure. Um, so I, uh, I’m from Northern Ireland Originally, I grew up in Northern Ireland, in Scotland. I did all of my, um, undergraduate and postgraduate study in the UK, um, and then moved over to the US to become a postdoc, um, first at Boston Children’s and then at Tufts University, uh, both in the Boston area. Um, and it was while I was there that I started getting more in interest in the, um, the scientific system itself, um, and how we are training people, how we are, um, you know, setting scientists up for success and producing scientists and not just science. So, um, obviously at that time I was also experiencing a lot of the frustrations that people find with the, the hyper competition that there is in this system. Um, and so, um, moved on afterwards. Uh, I’m now the executive director of this nonprofit future of research, uh, and we’re trying to, uh, champion, engage and empower early career researchers with evidence to help them change the, uh, research system and the enterprise that they’re experiencing, uh, and make improvements.

Emily (02:36): Yeah, I love this. It obviously dovetails really well with what I do. Uh, you guys have a broader focus. Mm. Um, I’m more narrow about just really getting people dialed in and helping them with their finances. Um, kind of throughout, you know, uh, pre-graduate school, during graduate school, post-graduate school. Um, so I love that we have sort of complimentary pursuits here. And we’ll of course be talking about that specifically with, with respect to salary in a moment. But can you, um, give me kind of a little bit more of an overview about, you know, what’s your team at future of research? What have you guys been up to, generally all the different areas that you work in?

Future of Research Nonprofit

Gary (03:09): Sure. So, yeah, we’re, uh, an organization, um, at the moment there’s just me as staff, and we have a board of about 20 early career researchers. Um, so we ended up forming this nonprofit. Originally we’d had a, a conference to bring early career researchers together and discuss some of the issues with, uh, the system and with hyper competition, um, that there is particularly in biomedicine. Uh, and from that conference and then a bunch of conferences around the country, we quickly realized there was this, this need for this, um, this group to be, you know, trying to have these conversations. Um, and in particular, you know, trying to give data and evidence to early career researchers to help ’em make better choices, but also to educate in some sense the rest of the scientific community about the realities that our generation is currently experiencing. So, you know, we have this board, um, um, and volunteers who are actively working on a bunch of projects and issues that, that come up and that we’re experiencing. Um, we have two major projects, which I think are, are, have both come out of local meetings that we held in the last couple of years which are really very, um, you know, we, we wanna try and have specific projects that we’re setting up and establishing, um, having looked at a, a need, uh, around in the community. So those projects, one of them we’re calling who’s on board, and that’s trying to get, uh, more early career folks into leadership positions. So we’re gonna start trying with scientific societies and trying to get more people onto the voting council positions at the top of the, the organization. Um, you know, and trying to bring in that perspective. Um, also recognizing that a lot of people need leadership training and development and, and so on. And hopefully generating a network of future leaders, um, that, that, uh, organizations across research can tap into. Then the other major project that we’re really pushing at the moment is, uh, focusing around mentoring. Um, I think mentoring is one of the biggest concerns of, um, grads, postdocs, uh, et cetera, you name it, throughout the system right now, junior faculty in particular, one of the first things that, that I am asked by junior faculty is, you know, how do I find out more about mentoring people and managing people because I don’t know how to do it and suddenly I’m expected to. Um, and, you know, this can lead to all sorts of issues with people reaching their full potential. Um, you know, egregious behavior can, can occur and is not really held accountable. So we’re, we’re pushing a big summit next June in Chicago to bring people working in this space, this, um, and doing research on mentoring together and trying to figure out what we can do to take grassroots action to really make sure institutions are putting mentoring right at the center of what they’re interested in. Um,

Emily (05:57): Yeah, sounds amazing. Um, especially, particularly the latter project, I think. Um, yeah, please keep going. Or any other major efforts there.

Gary (06:07): Yeah, so we, then we have, so those are things that we’ve sort of set up, um, deliberately, and then there’s things that we’ve sort of responded to and we try to be responsive to, you know, needs that arise. So one of those projects is sort of related to the who’s on board thing. Um, and it’s to do with peer review. Uh, and in particular, we’re trying to address this phenomenon of grad students and postdocs, essentially ghost writing a peer review report that is then submitted under somebody else’s name to a journal. Um, and you know, this, this is not only a problem, it’s sort of scholarly recognition. Um, but it, you know, at the same time we’re hearing that there’s not enough reviewers, um, and journals are sort of crying out for more reviewers and this lack of transparency about who’s actually doing the review and getting the names of particularly, you know, grads and postdocs who journals may want to review again in the future. Um, those sort of barriers of not putting those names across, um, and of not recognizing that scholarly work, uh, and, and who, who did it, um, is a thing that we’re pushing, uh, both with journals, but also, uh, we did a survey asking people about their experiences with this. And one of the big things coming up is that, of course, principal investigators have not been trained in peer review either generally. And so a lot of these practices are to do with just a lot of, uh, assumptions and, um, um, you know, a lack of clarity that there should be a different practice that you should be giving these names. So it’s really, that’s been really interesting to work on and sort of was in response to a survey done by, um, junior folks at eLife in the last year. So, so we’ve been following that. And then the other one, which, which we can talk more about now, is the, the salary project. Um, that really started just as we had formed the nonprofit. It was when there was a change to federal labor law being proposed, um, and the long, and the short of it was that this was going to affect postdocs and it was going to raise their salaries, um, or institutions were going to have to essentially have postdocs clocking in and out and, uh, tracking their time, which is not really very realistic. So, so there was this push to raise salaries, and we, we were following what institutions were doing, uh, to accommodate that change. And that then led us to asking, well, what are the actual salaries that people have and led into the, the, the work that we’ve, we’ve done here.

Emily (08:29): Yeah, I would love to talk about that a little bit more in depth now. Um, when I was, you guys just came out with a, a paper recently, right? What’s the title of that and where can people find it?

Gary (08:39): Sure. So the title is Assessing the Landscape of US Postdoctoral Salaries. Um, it’s open access, it’s in the studies in graduate and postdoctoral education, um, and, uh, which is part of the Emerald Insight Publishing Group. Uh, yeah,

What is a Postdoc?

Emily (08:56): Yeah. So my <laugh>, my question is, I was very interested in this, uh, section of the paper where you talked about the different titles that postdocs might have and how that affects what salaries they have. And it just led me to the question of what is a postdoc?

Gary (09:09): Yeah.

Emily (09:10): Actually, like, can we start there? What’s a postdoc?

Gary (09:12): Yeah. So yes, a postdoc is, so I can give you, I can start with what I think a postdoc should be, and we can maybe work from there. My, you know, when you’re, you’re going through the academic track, um, there’s, you know, you go through your undergraduate phase, then you go to graduate school, you get your PhD, uh, that’s the point at which in my opinion, you should be learning how to do science, how to carry out research, how to, you know, do experiments, uh, how to analyze them, how to learn the nuts and bolts of being a scientist. Um, then what has become the default over time is that in order to become a professor after getting your PhD, there’s an intermediate step known as the postdoc or carrying out post-doctoral research, um, post obviously being, after getting your doctorate. And, um, in my opinion, this is a period in which you should be thinking about your own research goals and how to take those forward and learning under the mentorship, uh, slash apprenticeship of an investigator who already, you know, is doing this, learning how to manage a group, learning how to mentor people, learning how to manage budgets, how to write grants, how to, you know, ensure that your research project can succeed and that you can lead a team. Um, but the postdoc more likely is in reality is, um, a period of further research. Um, usually someone will move on to do a, another project. It’s quite common to change field and get experience by doing a postdoc there. Um, but in reality, what people are doing is trying to get, uh, a number of papers trying to demonstrate that they can succeed in perhaps a different lab to where they did their PhD, um, and, um, sort of accrue credentials in order to get a faculty position to then start as a, as a professor.

Emily (11:09): And I, what I was curious about, because your understanding and my understanding are very, um, similar to one another, I was also coming outta sort of the biomedical world, so that kind of makes sense. But, um, I think in your paper you had something like 11 different common titles under which postdocs can be hired. And so I was just wondering if there’s part of the issue, uh, a discrepancy between how the, the employers or universities or workplaces or mentors see postdocs and how postdocs see themselves.

Gary (11:37): Yeah.

How Was the Idea for a Project to Assess Postdoc Salaries Formed?

Emily (11:38): Um, and we can get into this a little bit more, but one of, I think the main motivations behind your project was, um, just kind of trying to figure out what level of awareness universities, et cetera, have about their own, their own postdocs, whether they’re employees or not. So let, let’s take it back there a little bit bit. So like, you’re, you’re coming up with this idea. Okay. How, how was this idea formed for the project? What exactly were you asking?

Gary (12:00): Yeah, so you’re, you’re totally right, because we were coming from this perspective, I think this is particularly why we took the route that we did. Um, when we were looking at the policies that were being updated in response to this labor law, we started to ask ourselves the question, well, these are policies at an institution that doesn’t tell us necessarily what people are actually getting paid. And it requires adherence to a policy, uh, and that someone essentially is checking up that the policy is being followed. Now, we already, we have a, a preprint, um, paper, um, that we’ve done with, uh, rescuing biomedical research, another nonprofit in this space, um, looking at the National Science Foundation’s data on the number of postdocs. And, um, this was in reaction to a paper that claimed that the number of postdocs was in decline, because that apparently seemed to be reflected in the NSF data. Um, and we dug into that data a little, and we first questioned whether there was actually a decline or whether there was actually a bubble of people postdocing for longer after the recession in 2008. But one of the things we found was that institutions were doing a pretty terrible job of reporting year to year how many postdocs they had. And so, while we were very receptive to, you know, institutions telling us, oh, well, we’re raising our salaries, like this is going to be our new policy. Um, if you don’t know who your postdocs are to begin with, we were curious as to whether people would be falling through the cracks and whether you would actually know who your postdocs are, and, um, whether they’re getting the salaries that they’re supposed to be getting, uh, whether, whether the policies were actually reflected in reality, or whether an institution could say, you know, we recommend all our postdocs get this salary, and then there’s no follow up or, or action on that. So that was a big part of that. Right. And, and knowing as you say that there is this great breadth of, um, assumptions about what the postdoc is, um, you know, there is this constant argument of whether they are employees or whether they are trainees. Um, you know, sadly it seems that they’re employees whenever it suits in keeping them out of training or outta things that you need to do for students. But they’re also trainees when it suits in terms of giving them lower salaries and not giving them benefits.

What Position Counts as an Employee or Not an Employee?

Emily (14:16): I was just going to ask about that. Actually. This is one of, this is just a question that I’m constantly asking about whether people are employees w receiving W twos. Or not employees. And I would think that categorizing people as not employees would be an easy way to get around the, uh, you know, the pol- the, it’s a fair labor of Standards act, right? The FLSA, right?

Gary (14:38): Yeah. So yeah, the, the interesting thing about that, and a lot of institutions did in the beginning try to claim that they’re, because also it’s complicated by where the money comes from for the postdoc. So most postdocs are paid directly off a research project grant, um, as quote unquote staff on the grant. But a lot of postdocs are also on fellowships of various kinds from a whole multitude of different organizations and people on fellowships, uh, especially if they are per paid directly and not paid through the institution, they’re most usually referred to as trainees. Um, they often get the, the worst situation of losing their benefits often when they get on a fellowship, um, after moving off a, uh, another mechanism, um, because the institution says you’re no longer an employee, therefore you no longer have to provide benefits. And this came up a lot with the, the, the Labor Act, um, updates. And what was really interesting was the Department of Labor, um, the specification of like, who is a, who is an employee or not, doesn’t come down to who pays you. It’s the nature of the work that you’re doing. And one of the most interesting things that came up was this, this pushback that occurred of you can’t just claim that your fellows are not, that they are exempt from this law. They actually are not. And indeed, the Department of Labor told that to the National Institutes of Health, that’s why they raised their fellowship stipends, um, because they were told these people are not exempt. They are explicitly, they ended up explicitly being, uh, part of the target of those trying to make the change. Um, so yeah. So the, even within those definitions, part of them are just institutional. The institution will just argue that they have that definition, but it actually sometimes doesn’t even stand up under, under law. So it’s, it’s been an interesting part of this.

Emily (16:24): Yeah, that is very interesting. And it is so important, um, I think for people who are looking to take a new position, whether it’s as a graduate student or as a postdoc or, or what have you, um, to know going into it, how you are viewed by the institution. Employee, not employee trainee, not a, not trainee, um, just because yeah, your, your benefits or whatever might, um, change depending on the, the status that you have. Um, they could be taken away from you if something changes at the university level. Um, so just kind of go into whatever situation you have with eyes wide open.

What Did You Do for the Postdoc Salaries Project?

Emily (16:57): Yeah. So let’s get back to the, to the salary project. Um, so you were curious about, you know, whether policies were actually being applied at, at the institution. So, so what did the actually project end up being? What did you do for it?

Gary (17:10): Sure. So, so we wanted to get these salaries, and this is data that is not, you know, easy to find, uh, that is out there. And so we ended up with this rather blunt, somewhat aggressive, but also, um, easy and also standard methodology, which was to carry out freedom of information requests at public institutions. So what we would do is contact the freedom of information, uh, office or the public records office at the, at a public institution. They’re legally required to give out data like this. And we would ask for, um, in this case, we asked for the simply the title and the salary of everyone who was a postdoc. Um, we wanted to keep it as, as easy as possible. And that was on, we were asking for salaries on the date of December 1st, 2016, which was when this labor law was due to come into effect, uh, when, when changes were, were likely to happen, the institutions had been preparing for at the time. Um, and so, yeah. And so we asked, basically asked for, for this data. Now the, the reason it’s a bit aggressive is that it ends up, um, basically forcing the institution to give data in a, you know, we weren’t asking institutions, we weren’t going to the sort of postdoc offices or to various administrators and asking them to give us the data. Um, but that actually worked out as a really interesting part of this project as an internal metric of whether a university’s administration knows what postdocs are. So I would find some institutions were able to provide the data with no problem, and other institutions, I would be contacted back and asked, you know, what is a postdoc? Can you explain what this is? You know, I would have to look up titles sometimes at the institution to find out what the relevant titles were that we wanted. Um, and, um, you know, we were sort of cross-checking the number of salaries we’re getting with the number that NSF thought, um, that they had. Which, again, those numbers should be reported by people who know better what postdocs are to the NSF. And so we’re, you know, providing all these like controls and looking at seeing how good is the data that we’re getting, um, you know, on top of just getting the numbers, what standard is it at? What are we getting back? And that was actually a really interesting aspect of, of what we were receiving as well.

Commercial

Emily (19:32): Do you know what’s even scarier than an upcoming committee meeting the prospect of preparing your tax return? But it doesn’t have to be that way. I’ve created a variety of free and paid resources to help you get through tax season with as little pain as possible. These resources are specifically for grad students and fellowship recipients, post back through postdoc, check them out at pfforphds.com/tax.

Analysis and Findings from the From the Postdoc Salaries Project

Emily (20:03): So once you were able to get, you know, some data, uh, coming back from these public institutions, uh, what what did you do with that? What was, what was your analysis like?

Gary (20:14): Sure. So we had, uh, a data scientist on our team, um, who went through and tried to analyze, basically, you know, we’re, we’re sort of looking at the, the, the distributions of salaries. Um, and, you know, we wanted to break things out by geographic region, um, by, uh, gender, um, and, um, possibly other demographics. We have a little try at that. And also by the, the title, whether what variables there were that were affecting the salaries, um, and what we, you know, what were we seeing overall as the, again, you know, to a big part of this was just assessing the landscape, just figuring out what postdoc salaries looked like and giving us a sense, uh, giving us a bar to work from, uh, in terms of, of efforts going forward.

Emily (21:03): And so, was there anything, uh, well, what were sort of the broad, I guess, conclusions, was it just like, okay, here’s ranges of salaries and, uh, here’s the breakdown of these different groups. Like what were some of those conclusions? And then also was there anything that came out of that that was actually surprising to you?

Gary (21:18): Yeah, so, um, so yeah, we sort of got broad distributions of where salaries were. And we actually, um, before the, the paper was done when we’d actually done the, uh, initial data gathering, we had it write up, um, uh, in nature about this, um, I think it was titled Postdoc salaries very wildly from institution to institution. Um, and they did a very nice demographic of where all the salaries lay, and most people were in the forties, thousands of dollars, um, you know, between 40 and and 49,999, um, which made sense. Um, we actually find that 22% of all of our data was in a $25 range around the new, uh, NIH minimum stipend, uh, which was very close to what the proposed salary threshold had been under the, the federal labor law change. So we found that that really had a, a very striking effect. Um, and in fact, one of the things that was most interesting and I think, um, is useful for us in, in doing policy work going forward, we’re interested in finding out what is, what are the levers that we need to pull in order to raise postdoc salaries? And we actually found that the median salary for all postdocs across the us, regardless of field, was actually pegged to the minimum, uh, national Institutes of Health, um, national Research Service award stipend. So these are the, the numbers that NIH uses for things like F awards and T awards that postdocs are paid off. Um, these are the only people who have to actually be paid according to this stipend. Um, but a lot of institutions just peg their salary scale to the NIH, and in particular, they may not use the scale year to year. They may not have increases per year, but they certainly will peg the minimum salary, must be the NIH’S level. And so we actually find that the most effective policy lever for raising postdoc salaries in the US would be to get the NIH to raise their, um, the, the NRSA award stipends. And that’s obviously something we’ve been pushing. 

Emily (23:28): I’m, I’m so glad you brought that up. Um, I remember, so several years ago, I, I did a fellowship at the, um, the National Academies, and I remember reading their, uh, postdoctoral report. The postdoctoral experience revisited, I think was the recent report on it. And seeing that and seeing that discussion about how important the NIH minimum salary, uh, recommendation was, how so many universities were going off of it, which is really just so surprising because again, it’s one, it’s a recommendation. And except for their own internal stuff like it, you know, that’s required. But for everyone else, it’s just a recommendation. And two, it’s a minimum. And it’s not at all taking into account like different cost of living, you know, areas. Like is it, like, is that minimum supposed to be for Bethesda, or is it supposed to be national? I’m not even sure about that. But, um, yeah, anyway, just the fact that they were going off of this as if it were absolute truth and no, it was only ever a minimum and only ever a recommendation. And I’m so glad that you brought that up. And I believe I read that within the last, we’re recording this in December, 2018. I think within the last week or so, NIH actually has raised, um, their, their recommended minimum salary, right?

Gary (24:35): They have, yeah. They have done, they, they did a big raise. We actually plotted this out in a, in the first figure in the paper of raises over time. And, um, you know, the, most of the raises, um, to the current towards the current level happened during the NIH doubling around the turn of the century. Uh, and then the, the Fair Labor Standards Act was actually another major push. Um, you know, the NIH had been pushed along, uh, a couple of times by various reports. Um, I think the, the, the last one previous to the FLSA was the 2012 Biomedical Working Group report. And so there’s been these little pushes and since the FLSA, they’ve pushed up a lot at that point, and then they have consistently continued to push quite high. Um, I think this year was a 2% increase, so that now the minimum is at $50,000, uh, which has been recommended for, for quite some time now.

Emily (25:30): Yeah. So they finally reached another milestone there of getting into the the fifties range <laugh>.

Gary (25:34): Yeah, exactly. So, um, yeah. And then, you know, this has actually been useful as a real policy example. You know, I and, uh, the president of Future of Research, Jessica Polka, were both on the National Academy study, uh, for the next generation researchers initiatives, which NIH is releasing its recommendations on, uh, in a, in a few weeks. And, um, one of the things we were able to push having this data was, well, we know the NIH number is a very important number. And so the recommendation, I think in the upcoming outta that report was NIH needed to raise its number, but also institutions should take that number and then adjust for cost of living and for years experience. So sort of both, both groups needed to be both sets of stakeholders needed to be, to be, uh, yeah. Working on that.

Emily (26:20): Yeah, absolutely. Um, so any other interesting findings from the paper?

Gary (26:25): Yeah. Um, I think one of the things I was surprised with, uh, most was how many salaries there were in the fifties thousand, uh, of dollars. Um, and it was interesting, you know, we did a little bit of, uh, breaking down by, um, by field as far as we could. Um, we had only requested the title and, um, salary of the postdocs to, you know, to have this basic, uh, uh, request, um, and as reasonable requests that hopefully institutions wouldn’t refuse as possible. But half of those institutions ended up giving us also names and department, uh, information so we could work out field for a large subset. Um, and we find that there was no real field dependence on the salaries. Um, you know, I think a lot of people assume that, oh, the humanities will be all the salaries in the low range and the, you know, the higher ones will be computer science, and certainly towards the higher end, you do see some of that. But, you know, there’s no, the humanities are not lower on average than anyone else, to be honest. You’d be surprised how often biomedical en- engineering is, uh, in the low salary range. Um, and, um, yeah, so I think that was one of our surprises, and a lot of this anecdotally seems to be, um, you know, when I go and talk around the country about salaries, um, and make a, a big push for people to be talking about salaries, uh, I hear a lot of who negotiates. Um, a lot of postdocs are negotiating salaries a lot more than I think people know. And so there’s this whole, I think there’s this disparity in who’s asking and who’s not asking. And you know, frankly, that we’re not even supposed to be talking about money to talk about money in academia, as I’m sure you’re, you’re often facing as well in your work to talk about this is already to, to cast out on whether you deserve to be there, because if you’re looking for money, you shouldn’t be in academia sort of thing. Right. So, so that’s been an interesting thing to push as well.

Emily (28:22): Yeah. And I think that leads well into, um, the project that we first met over. Um, you first approached me about, so to give a little backstory for the listener, um, in 2014, I think my husband and I created a website called, uh, PhDstipends.com and it’s just a really simple database where people can enter what their stipends or salaries or fellowships or whatever, uh, your, your university is calling it, uh, basically how much you’re being paid, um, and then kind of whatever other details you would like to add. Um, and it’s just a very simple database, but it’s got, I think there’s over 4,000 entries in it now, and it’s, it’s getting pretty robust. Um, and so anyway, it’s a great place to go to just kind of compare maybe for prospective graduate students offers that they’re getting, um, to see if they’re reasonable, see what other people at that university are being paid, see what, you know, other people in their field are earning at different universities. So that’s kind of that purpose. And then forever, we had the idea that we should do the same thing for postdocs, but we never did it until you and I entered into conversation. And, um, if I remember correctly, the motivation for wanting something like what we eventually created, which is postdocsalaries.com, um, was to figure out if, again, these, well, sort of what you’re saying, if the policies are actually being played out at the individual level for postdoc. So, um, if even the data that was being reported to you was the same as what was perceived to be, you know, the salary by the postdoc, um, him or herself, and then also, you know, the FOIA requests were only given to public institutions. And so you’re completely missing everybody who’s at a private institution. So that was a big question mark there. Um, so yeah, so anything else from your perspective to add about sort of why we started that aspect of the project?

Gary (30:01): Yeah, I mean, as you say, you know, for example, I have no data from Boston <laugh>, um, in the, the postdoc salary paper here because there’s no public institutions essentially there that we FOIA’d or that you can FOIA. So that’s obviously, you know, that’s an example of missing out a, a huge chunk of the population. Um, and, you know, then you’re asking the question, well, this is all for public institutions. Do we think the private institutions might be paying more or less or, or what have you? So again, getting people to self-report, um, you know, the quality of the data that we got for this paper, um, we had a lot of pre-processing, first of all, because, um, frankly, the data that we got, what we asked for was annualized salaries. What we often got was what had been through payroll, and again, with the example of people on fellowships, uh, if they were being paid directly, um, sometimes we would get these salaries back that were zero or a few thousand dollars. Um, and you know, the, the absolute legal minimum under federal labor law is 23,660. Um, and so we, we give institutions the benefit of the doubt and said, well, let’s cut off all the salaries, be below this certain level. That’s not to say all the ones above it or exactly what is being paid, but there was this element of nuance to the numbers we were getting and whether that would affect overall our data. So with the self-reporting, um, it’s nice to not only get private places, but also to get a sense of whether what people are reporting, um, matches up with what the institution is reporting. We, we knew for one institution, university of Washington, um, they had actually sent us excellent salary data. Um, and, uh, I was contacted over social media by someone on a fellowship there who said, oh, you know, you’ve been talking a little bit about how fellows are gonna be lower. Um, you know, I, I’m betting that my salary in Washington will look lower than it is. And I was like, well, all the Washington salaries look, you know, very, they’re all above NIH and they all seem like pretty good. So I just sent that person what their salary was in my data, and they said, oh, that’s exactly what I’m seeing. So it was even, it was really great to see that positive story of an institution that was, you know, giving us like, the data exactly that we wanted <laugh>. Um, so, and seeing that match up. Um, but yeah, I think it’s, it’s fun to, to have the, the, the effort online for people to self-report because it gives you, you know, we are obviously putting out salaries and we’ve repeated our data collection effort again for 2017 and 2018. And so we’re starting to gather that data now and we can keep putting that data out there. But I think it’s very useful also for, for this sort of self-reporting tool for people to go in and look and see what people are doing. And it also gives the opportunity for people to comment on issues that have come up. ’cause we also have benefits in there. Benefits is just a whole minefield with postdocs, even within the same institution. There can be all sorts of different benefits categories for all sorts of different titles of postdocs. So people self-reporting what they’re getting, and also just having a free form space in which to comment on things they experienced has been really interesting to look at. Um, and that sort of sharing of information, which is really what we’re very passionate about, that people are making informed choices and able to act on those.

Emily (33:17): I think that’s where we have such good overlap between, between you and I in terms of our missions and, and I am like all about more transparency around money in general, but salary, I mean, that’s a really difficult area, but we need more transparency around that too. So I agree. It’s so interesting to look into the database. Um, again, postdocsalaries.com, go there, enter your salaries, enter your benefit information. What I love seeing again is, uh, fellowship versus employee kind of stuff. That’s so interesting. And again, what the titles are. And, uh, we do have a section there for demographics as well, so that you guys, that that data is not, uh, publicly visible, but you guys are able to do that analysis on it to continue the questions of who’s being paid what and why. Um, and then my other favorite kind of section about this is regarding negotiating, which you brought up earlier. Um, the last time I looked, which wasn’t, it was maybe a couple months ago, about 25% of the people who had entered, you know, their information into postdocsalaries.com had negotiated something or is had attempted to. Uh, which was kind of a higher proportion that I was thinking, but it’s very encouraging. And so any, I would say any person who’s looking at taking a postdoc position should at least attempt to negotiate. It might not be successful, but, uh, you know, that’s what you would do for any normal job. And absolutely, this is, you are at a high level of training already. Uh, many of us consider it to be a job, whether it’s that officially or not. And so I think it’s a good encouragement just to see other people’s examples, just to know that other people are negotiating and you know, you can do it too. 

Gary (34:46): I think that has been one of the biggest surprises. And then, you know, it’s one of those things that when I knew that a lot of people must have been negotiating because the salaries were there, were salaries higher than what I was expecting. And then starting to talk about that with people. Yeah. 25% now, I actually think sounds about right. Like it’s, it sounds high, but it also is, I think reflects the, the, the data broadly. Um, and my favorite thing in talking about this too, because whenever I give a talk in an institution, I just love to bring up money and talk about money and usually under the, the auspices of, we’re not supposed to talk about this, so I’m not gonna talk about salary and like, what you should do about it. Um, and as you know, speaking to graduate students in particular, um, this should be one of the questions that you ask your prospective pi, and I am, you know, the not only to to get more money, which I think people deserve, but also frankly, how that question is answered will tell you a lot. I think about whether you want to work with that person, because someone who says no can give very different reasons and can be a person that you may, may or may not want to work for. For example, if someone says, I would really love to pay you more, you know, I only have so much of a certain grant, you know, we can look into applying for fellowships and I can give you some more money on top as a reward, which is a thing that also happens quite often. Um, you know, because essentially you’re saving me a salary so I can give you some money out of a, you know, another budget or something for, for that. Uh, as a, as a thank you, uh, versus someone who says, oh, why would I pay you more? Right? Like, why, why should I give you a higher salary? This isn’t about the money. Like, I think if a person tells you that you should really reflect on whether you wanna work for that person, because that could reflect other attitudes that they have about you and your role and your importance and so on. And, and whether you are a warm body in the lab versus someone that they really wanna see succeed and, and encourage. So I think that’s, it’s all part of gathering information and being, you know, making an informed choice, um, and realizing also that you are a bargain, uh, to these people and that, you know, you really should be pushing. If they want someone good, it’s good to try and push a little and see, see whether they’re, they’re willing to budge on some of these things.

Action Steps That Postdocs Can Take Today to Improve Their Salaries, Benefits, or Working Conditions

Emily (37:02): I love it. I love it so much. <laugh>. Um, let’s, let’s zoom back out a tiny bit. So, what can a person who is a postdoc today or expects to be a postdoc in the near future, um, what can they do, what can they get involved in that will help them improve either their salary or their benefits or working conditions or anything like that? What’s some action steps that postdocs can take today?

Gary (37:24): Sure. So, um, always having data to hand is such a useful thing. So both for the individual, but also for groups who are trying to advocate. You know, we hope that the data like this gives a, um, gives a somewhat of a mandate to say, Hey, you know, here are salaries that people are getting, um, that, that are, you know, are in my field or at this institution or what have you, and, you know, or this is what your policy says and this is what you should be doing. Really trying to go in with, with that, particularly on the personal level is good. Um, we found that, um, what was a nice example was that when we were comparing various institutions publicly, we found that there were administrators at institutions who were trying to push for raises who had faced opposition. Um, suddenly we’re able to say, well, we’re being compared with everyone else on this list and we don’t look very good compared to our, our aspirational peers or our, you know, whoever they’re comparing themselves to. And if we wanna be competitive for postdocs, um, that, you know, that then they were having success with that. So for groups who are looking to push for change at an institution, um, you know, there’s a number of lines of evidence. Um, we have, uh, various resources at our, our website on postdoc salaries that we hope are useful for people trying to push for those change at institutions. Again, comparing with the peers is always a useful one. Um, also pointing out the recommendations that there are, I think our most recent recommendation is that the salary should be at least 50,000 then has cost of living adjusted locally, then also has years of experience. Um, and, uh, yeah, that, that these are the recommendations that are out there, that this is what institutions should be doing. Um, you know, we see varying success with this, uh, at various institutions. It depends who’s there to be honest, and, and whether they feel they are concerned about this or not. Um, I would definitely recommend to institutions who are in the Midwest, um, or who are at places where there’s a, um, you know, there’s some institutions you go and they’re like, oh, we really struggle to get quote unquote good postdocs. Um, not quite sure exactly what that means. I think it’s a little bit of, you know, we are not in Boston, so we struggle to get all the people who just apply to Boston. But that’s a good point of, you know, if you’re in institution that shows that you can pay more and live somewhere in the Midwest, which has a lower cost of living, you actually may attract more people at this time when, you know, people are struggling to be able to afford to stay in academia, to be perfectly honest. So, so I think these are all good buttons to, to try to push. Um, and now that we have this data here as a baseline to start working with, working with, um, hopefully that’s, that’s a useful thing to, to use as evidence.

Emily (40:13): Yeah, absolutely. And the, the listeners can participate in this by again, going to postdocsalaries.com and entering their information and telling your colleagues and your friends about it too, and just continue to spread it. I think as of this recording, we have about 1200, um, entries, which is decent, but like, let’s keep it growing. Absolutely. Um, and you guys will keep going on the public institution side of that effort. So I would say particularly if you’re at a private institution, it’s even more important to get out this self-reporting, uh, mechanism because there’s not another good way to get at the data, at least that we know of right now. So, yeah. Gary, thank you so, so much for, for joining me today and I look forward to, you know, continuing to work together on this.

Gary (40:54): Yeah, for sure.

Conclusion

Emily (40:56): Gary, I’m so glad you joined me on the podcast today for this important conversation. Show notes for this episode are at pfforphds.com/S2E3. If you wanna get in touch with me, you can email me at [email protected] or find me on Twitter @pfforPhDs or Facebook Personal Finance for PhDs. If you’d like to receive updates on new podcast episodes and other content, go to pfforphds.com/subscribe. See you in the next episode. The music is Stages of Awakening by Poddington Bear from the free Music Archive and is shared under CC by NC Podcast. Editing and show notes creation by Jewel Lipps.

Negotiating PhD Funding Offers: This Grad Student Did It Successfully

January 28, 2019 by Jewel Lipps

In this episode, Emily interviews John Vsetecka, a second-year PhD student in History at Michigan State University. When John was a prospective PhD student, he attempted to negotiate the stipend and benefits of the three admissions offers he was seriously considering. John shares exactly how he initiated the negotiation process and the outcomes at each of the universities. His negotiation method is well-researched and well-considered and is applicable to many if not most other prospective graduate students. John and Emily also discuss how prospective PhD students should combat imposter syndrome during the admissions process.

Links mentioned in episode

  • Tax Center for PhDs-in-Training
  • Volunteer as a Guest for the Podcast
  • PhDStipends.com
  • GradCafe 
negotiating PhD offer

0:00 Introduction

1:05 Please Introduce Yourself

John Vsetecka is a second-year PhD student in the Department of History at Michigan State University. He studies modern Ukrainian history, with a focus on the 1932-1933 famine. Before beginning his PhD program, he worked as a GEAR UP advisor. This is a federal grant agency that works with low income students, called Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs. He worked in Colorado to help middle school and high school, low income students prepare for college. Before this job, he got a Master of Arts in History in 2014 at the University of Northern Colorado.

2:55 What PhD offers and interview requests did you receive from universities?

When John applied to PhD programs, he applied to eight schools and faced some rejections. He considered four offers, then narrowed his list to three. The first offer he eliminated would have required that he start with MA and work into PhD. Since he already had an MA, he felt he was ready to move on. He seriously considered three offers. He accepted the offer from Michigan State University, where he is now. He visited “University 2” in person for an interview. He had a virtual interview with “University 3.”

4:21 What did you think about the offers from these three universities?

John wasn’t sure what a fair offer was for a PhD position in History. Generally, PhD students are shy about sharing their financial experiences. So he did research and his mentor from the University of Northern Colorado guided him in this process. He talked to other PhD students, who would say they had enough to live on or that they were struggling. He used the websites GradCafe and PhD Stipends. He got a sense of what people were being paid, including their health insurance and fees. From all of this information, he decided two offers were fair and worth considering.

Emily shares an important piece of advice for prospective PhD students is to do your research. Anonymous databases, like PhD Stipends, provide more transparency around these offers. But you should talk to current graduate students, because it’s one thing to look at the numbers, and another thing to get a feel for how it is to live on that amount.

Further Reading: How to Read Your PhD Program Offer Letter

7:54 How did you initiate the negotiation process for your PhD stipend offers?

John negotiated his stipend offers during his interviews. He went to visit two universities in person for interviews, and had a virtual interview a University 3. His first interview was at University 2. During the visit, they have an itinerary and fully scheduled day. The experience is like a whirlwind. He prepared a set of questions for faculty members and set of questions for Graduate Director. With the Graduate Director, he talked about the PhD program as a whole to get their insight. Then he directly asked the Graduate Director if there is any other money available, such as other fellowships, and explained that he has other offers with higher financial value. The Graduate Director is the one that can control the money. The faculty can only put in good word on a student’s behalf. So as a prospective PhD student, you should know who you can talk to and know who you can negotiate with. You don’t need to be afraid to ask tough questions about financial aid.

The PhD program interview was a good time to negotiate PhD stipend offers. John waited until he received all offers to see where he stood across the field, and this gave him some leverage. Negotiating like this is is what people do with any other job. John told the Graduate Director that he had other offers, but he didn’t show them the letters themselves. Negotiating before receiving all other offers and before the interview can seem desperate. But if he negotiated after the visit, it might seem like that offer wasn’t his first choice and he was only negotiating after losing another offer. John also believes that talking in person is the best type of communication. Negotiating in person puts them on the spot.

During his interview visit for University 2, John asked the Graduate Director about the potential for a better financial package. The Graduate Director told John that they would get back to him a couple hours. Later that day, John received an email with a offer for a fellowship package. This showed John that they were willing to work on his behalf. He was surprised by this because he had expected them to negotiate and push back. During the interview visit, the department is most focused on recruitment, so they quickly considered his request and acted on it.

John went into the meeting with a set plan for negotiation. He had a notebook and visibly took notes during the conversation, which indicates that he took the negotiation seriously. Treating graduate school interviews like a professional scenario sets you up for success.

14:35 What new offer did you receive after negotiating?

Because he negotiated with the Graduate Director, John received an offer of a university fellowship instead of a teaching assistantship. The new offer was university-based funding, not department-based funding like his original offer. The university fellowship had different teaching requirements than the department teaching assistantship. It was more money in total, as well as better health care coverage. This showed what kind of control the department and university has over financial awards for PhD students. Even if the university can’t raise stipends, they can cover more fees or provide better benefits.

16:22 What outcomes did you get from negotiating with the other two universities?

John learned that not everyone would negotiate. At Michigan State, he had a generous offer that he was already happy with. Even so, he asked the Director of Graduate Studies at Michigan State about his financial award. The director kindly told him that his original financial award was what the department was willing to offer. John later learned that his department offers different financial packages based on a tiered system, and he was happy with the offer he received.

At University 3, John had a virtual meeting with the department. John brought up that he had offers with much more value than what they had offered him. John says that honestly, he was displeased with University 3’s financial offer. He learned that due to financial constraints at University 3, the department couldn’t offer more money. The department suggested term-to-term options. John didn’t want to be on his toes every semester wondering if he’d get paid. Though University 3 offered paid tuition, the money offered for teaching/research was not enough to even consider.

It’s important for prospective PhD students to recognize that some offers only tell you about the first year, while others present a five-year plan for funding.

19:35 Based on what you experienced, what would you do to negotiate differently?

John says he wouldn’t change much. While he knew negotiation was possible, he personally didn’t know anyone in his cohort group that negotiated their stipend offer. John heard from his advisors and mentors that it’s ok to ask, but you have to know to ask. John says this is one of those hidden things in academia. If prospective graduate students receive multiple offers, this is a chance to use offers against each other.
even if you get one offer, be happy, but if you get more offers you can use them

Emily brings up that often, applicants don’t feel a lot of confidence. They often think, “Who am I to be receiving these offers?” This imposter syndrome deters prospective PhD students from negotiating their stipends and ensuring that they receive the best offer.

22:27 How did you know negotiating your PhD offer would be possible and welcome?

John’s MA program advisor told him how to negotiate PhD stipend offers. First, you have to apply to multiple universities and know their programs well. Second, you need to know who you want to work with. Third, you need to talk with current graduate students. This is the most important advice. If you find their email on department websites, you can email them directly. Fourth, online communities like GradCafe help you connect with people who can help you.

John says that graduate school applicants should treat a PhD position like any other job. John says this profession should not be excluded from the process of negotiation. John’s experience at GEAR UP, where he helped low income students fight for undergraduate school money, showed him that there is a lot of money out there. He says it’s unfortunate so many undergraduates go into a lot of debt, when there are all types of money out there for different skills and talents. John wonders why graduate students can’t have that money too? There are different organizations, based in different fields, but money is out there. He suggests prospective students apply to everything they’re qualified for, but they also ask universities and departments what they can give.

Emily adds that prospective PhD students need to consider cost of living. If you have school A versus school B with higher stipend and in lower cost of living, you can ask the school A’s department what they can do to make the offer comparable.

26:44 Has your negotiation had any lasting impact on your graduate career?

John says the negotiation process doesn’t stop when you receive your final offer. Negotiation is a longer standing issue to think about in the future. At Michigan State, John and his peers negotiate for conference money, travel money, research money for the summer. Some graduate students can’t find money beyond teaching assistantships. Because he considered these benefits in his financial offer, he accepted a position that allows him the time and money to not worry. He has summer funding and he can teach online. For instance, he taught a seven week class online while being in Ukraine for research. He chose a school with an institutional investment. The department is doing well and it is investing in its students. He saw that the department was willing to invest continually in their students. He thinks the investment will continue after he graduates.

29:33 Final Comments

John says prospective graduate students should feel free to reach out to him. He likes to help in any way he can. When you get your offers, the first thing you should do is celebrate, and get a round of applause. After celebrating, look over your financial offer, and look beyond stipend to health insurance and benefits. If you get multiple offers, compare them. Be confident about your acceptance into a program and don’t be afraid to negotiate. Know that you have power in these situations. Even though graduate students often don’t have much power, this is the situation where you do. You have all the power and you should use it while you can.John treated PhD offers like job offers because it’s also a job, in literal and figurative sense.

31:27 Conclusion

Working Hard and Playing Hard as a Grad Student in NYC

November 26, 2018 by Emily

On this episode, Emily interviews Nicholas Giangreco, a bioinformatics graduate student at the Columbia University Medical Center. Nick’s expenses in Manhattan are relatively high – such as spending over 50% of his net income on rent – but his stipend still allows him to spend on his priorities and still save money consistently. Nick lived very frugally while he was paying off his student loans prior to grad school, and now applies his thoughtful budgeting skills to enjoying life in Manhattan without breaking the bank or detracting from his research.

Links mentioned in episode

  • Personal Finance for PhDs Membership Community
  • Volunteer as a Guest for the Podcast

PhD_NYC_playing_hard

0:00 Introduction

1:15 Q1: Please Introduce Yourself

Nick Giangreco is a bioinformatics graduate research assistant at Columbia University Medical Center in New York City. He started his program in August 2016. His post-taxes pay is approximately $1,300 biweekly.

2:58 Q2: What are your five largest expenses each month?

Nick’s top expense categories are rent, health, transportation, and food. His miscellaneous and entertainment expenses are considerably low. He uses a spreadsheet to monitor his spending.

3:38 #1 Expense: Rent

Nick lives in a studio apartment located on-campus and managed by the university. He pays $1,200 for his studio, which is lower than nearby off campus studio apartments that are $1,500 to $1,600 rent. Nick recognizes that he could find housing options near campus for less than $1,200 monthly rent. He mentions his friends who share four bedroom apartments and each pay $600 for their room. Finding a place in New York City is challenging. If you don’t find somewhere on Craig’s List, you may need a broker and to pay the broker fee.

Nick says the majority of graduate students live on-campus. To accommodate the demand for on-campus housing, the university has three tiers of priority consideration for housing applicants. The first priority tier is international students, the second tier is students from outside the New York – New Jersey – Connecticut Tri-State area, and the third tier is students from within the Tri-State area.

According to Nick, living on-campus makes graduate student life easier. Nick has a 15 minute walk to work, and he avoids commuting on the subway. The university gives current residents the first priority to renew leases. Nick plans to renew his lease for his on-campus apartment.

11:38 #2 Expense: Health

Nick spends a few hundred dollars per month for pilates sessions. He sees a personal pilates trainer in the West Village and pays $100 per session. He goes to physical therapy and rehabilitation at the hospital at Columbia. The copay is $20, which adds up since he has an appointment every week.

Nick’s health insurance does not cover his pilates session, but he likes his personal trainer and gets value out of the sessions. He first tried going to pilates classes at the university’s gym for no charge, but he was dissatisfied with the generalized approach of group classes. He wanted something personalized for his needs, so it is his priority to budget for pilates classes.

14:23 #3 Expense: Transportation

Nick estimates that he spends $200 to $300 per month on transportation and travel, or as little as $100 in a month if he doesn’t leave New York City. He puts $20 on his subway card and adds as needed. Additionally, he takes taxis and Ubers to get around Manhattan. Though taking a taxi to the JFK airport can be expensive ($70), the subway takes two hours. He uses Amtrak to go to his hometown, but those tickets add up. He also looks for cheap tickets from Megabus.

18:55 #4 Expense: Food

Nick spends less than $200 per week on food. In his studio apartment, he has a kitchenette which has a stove but no oven. He doesn’t buy groceries that require baking. He buys non-perishables and items that keep well. Some of his go-to items are sweet potatoes, oatmeal, and popcorn. He takes out $20 per week in cash for use at the food trucks, which only accept cash. He buys gyros for $5 and coffee for $1 from the food trucks. He goes to restaurants or diners once or twice a week.

Nick looks for free food from graduate school events. He is part of a Slack group for graduate students in the department, where people share information about free food. He eats food at seminars, lectures when alumni are invited, and club events.

Nick’s kitchenette does change how he approaches his food budget. When he lived in Washington, DC, he lived in a house with a kitchen. He used to batch cook on the weekend and set aside portions of leftovers for the week. He would host friends for meals. In New York City, he doesn’t have room to host anyone and can’t cook very much. He microwaves sweet potatoes and makes rice and beans on the stove. He keeps leftovers from events. He doesn’t plan his food for the whole week, instead he plans by the day. Nick thinks he could plan better, but right now he needs to focus on his PhD work so he needs the convenience.

30:35 Low Entertainment Expenses

Nick says there is a lot to do in New York City. He doesn’t spend much money on entertainment because he does a few cheap activities. He goes to clubs and university events. He sees plays for $10 on the Columbia Medical Center campus. He saw Spongebob the Musical for $30. Though Nick has friends who go out for drinks every day, Nick doesn’t buy much alcohol.

33:30 Q3: What are you currently doing to further your financial goals?

Nick recently paid off all his student loans. Before starting his PhD, Nick lived in DC for two years. He lived a very frugal lifestyle, and took two and a half years to pay off his student loans. Now, Nick is working on his rainy day fund so he can create a financial cushion in his budget. He spends about $2,300 per month of his $2,600 monthly income, so he puts the rest to savings.

Nick keeps a budget in google sheets to log his expenses. He wants to become conscious of his spending habits. He is looking into passive investing approaches and learning about retirement. Columbia Medical Center provides graduate students the option to invest with Vanguard. Though there is no matching offer, he determine an amount to withhold out of his biweekly check. He called the financial office and asked explicitly about this retirement program applicability to graduate students, and he is considering it.

Nick tries to save $100 to $200 per month for his rainy day fund, and wants to increase this to $300 to $500 per month.

39:14 Q4: What don’t you spend money on that might surprise people?

Nick doesn’t spend much money on entertainment or alcohol. He takes it seriously that he is in New York City for graduate school, so he prioritizes his studies and his work. He doesn’t go to Brooklyn or the East Side, instead he goes to Central Park for free and finds cheap shows at comedy clubs. He uses the subway because this transit option is $20 to $30 less than taxis and Ubers. He will listen to podcasts while he’s on the subway.

43:07 Q5: What are you happy with in your spending and what would you like to change?

Nick is happy with his food spending and his entertainment spending. He has a social life and indulges in brunch with friends on the weekends. He wishes he could save more on rent, but he doesn’t want the responsibilities that come with living in a house. Landlord, roommates, and housing infrastructure problems add extra stress that he doesn’t want to deal with. He wants to concentrate on graduate school, and his studio apartment helps him focus. He also appreciates the security in his building, the community and the convenience. He lives on-campus and one block away from the subway. Ultimately, the convenience of the location is worth the high rent.

46:42 Q6: What is your best advice for someone new to your city who is budget-conscious?

Nick recommends living on-campus. He thinks the Columbia Medical Center bioinformatics graduate program pays well. He says the initial payment for first years is nearly $20,000 as a lump sum, which needs to be budgeted carefully. The Columbia Marketplace Facebook group is useful to find free and cheap items. The Grad Talk list-serve helps you find out about free and cheap items as well.

Nick says to enjoy yourself without going crazy, and to be mindful. Anyone considering New York City for a PhD program should know that grad school can be intense, New York City can be intense, but this is a time to work really hard while making good friends and good memories. Nick coordinates a Meetup group and leads an NYC chapter of an international organization. New York gives you access to broader networks and opportunities.

51:38 How do you budget your biweekly pay? How does it compare to other pay structures?

Nick used to work at the National Institute of Health in DC, where he monthly check. The biweekly pay does not change how he budgets, instead he enters his income twice a month into a spreadsheet instead of once a month. He had enough cushion money in his account to manage expenses, and knows that he will get another paycheck in two weeks. His spreadsheet helps him keep track.

55:41 Q7: Would you like to make any other comments on what it takes to get by where you live on what you earn?

Nick says it’s a great time to be a graduate student in New York City. So many people like to visit New York City, so it’s great for spontaneous reunions with friends. It’s easy to get out of the city if you want. New York City offers many opportunities, and you’ll interact with people from multiple universities, companies, and form a broad network.

57:48 Conclusion

Even in NYC, This Graduate Student Maintains a Super Frugal Lifestyle

September 24, 2018 by Emily

In this episode, Emily interviews Athena Pierquet, a rising second-year graduate student at New York University in English. In her first year as a PhD student, Athena lived on her $28,000 per year fellowship and save all of her smaller income sources, but her finances are facing a new challenge as she transitions out of subsidized university housing. Despite living in Manhattan, Athena maintains a very frugal lifestyle, minimizing her spending on groceries, transportation, entertainment, and recreation.

Links mentioned in episode

  • Personal Finance for PhDs Membership Community
  • Frugal Month
  • PF for PhDs Facebook Page
  • Volunteer as a Guest in Season 2

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google Play Music, Stitcher, or Spotify.

Give your feedback on Season 1 and influence the direction for Season 2 through this form.

NYC frugal grad student

0:00 Introduction

1:15 Q1: Please Introduce Yourself

Athena is a rising second year PhD student in the Department of English at New York University. She lives in the Manhattan neighborhood Stuyvesant, or Stuy Town. Her overall income was $38,000 from several university sources. Most of her income comes from the MacCracken Fellowship, provided for all NYU PhD students, which was $27,526 this past year. She received a housing stipend of $5,500. Several scholarships and grants made up $4,000 of her income, and short term research contracts made up $1,000 to $2,000.

2:20 How is your income reported for taxes?

For taxes, Athena has to self report the MacCracken Fellowship and her other scholarships to the federal government. The university provides her a 1098-T form for taxes. Her short term research contracts are reported on W-2, but these are a minor part of her income.

4:08 Q2: What are your five largest expenses each month?

Athena’s five largest expenses are rent, food, books and supplies, incidentals, and going out for fun.

4:28 #1 Expense: Rent

Athena pays $1,100 per month for rent. This cost includes all utilities, except for internet. She shares a two-bedroom apartment in Stuy Town with another first year NYU PhD student. The market rate for her apartment is $3,500 per month, but since the apartment is in a university housing complex, the cost is subsidized by the university. However, university housing is only available to first year PhD students, so Athena is searching for new housing in Manhattan.

For her new housing search, Athena’s budget is $1,200 to $1,300 for a room in a three or four bedroom apartment. NYU will continue to provide a housing stipend of $5,500 during her second year, but in subsequent years the housing stipend will be replaced with income from teaching classes. In general, her income does not increase to cover the new housing costs.

Athena saved much of her income from her first year in anticipation of her move into the cut throat Manhattan housing market. To get an apartment in Manhattan, she needs $3,000 to $5,000 available. Securing an apartment requires payment deposits for first month’s rent and last month’s rent.

9:57 #2 Expense: Food

Athena’s food budget is $100 per week. This category broadly covers anything she purchases to eat. She includes groceries, coffee shops, restaurants, and take-out in her weekly food budget. She plans out her meals and makes grocery shopping a priority. She makes almost all of her food at home and describes some of her meals, such as fully loaded oatmeal and hearty, entree salads. Athena eats at restaurants only two or three times each semester. She has several frugal tips for going to restaurants in Manhattan and getting free food from NYU events.

20:30 #3 Expense: Books and Course Supplies

Athena’s spending on books and course supplies is about $300 per semester. Her expenses for books and course supplies are considered non-taxable income. As a literature student, she needs many books for her work. She estimates that if she bought every book she needed or wanted, she would be spending thousands of dollars. She frequently borrows from the library, gets used books, and finds resources online. Nonetheless, this was tricky to budget for because of different needs for different courses.

24:29 #4 Expense: Incidentals

Athena budgeted for unexpected expenses, which she describes as the impulsive book purchase, miscellaneous fees, and spontaneous entertainment. Since she set her budget week by week, she intentionally put $45 each week for incidentals. Typically, she only had one or two unexpected expenses each month. The miscellaneous category is a place to lose money if you’re not careful, in Athena’s opinion.

27:29 Problems budgeting for taxes while on a fellowship

Athena later learned that the $45 per week that she budgeted for incidentals was really what she needed for taxes. When Athena began first year of graduate school, she didn’t know how much to set aside for taxes. NYU does not withhold taxes for U.S. citizens in their PhD programs, so it was Athena’s responsibility to estimate how much she might owe in taxes and plan for tax season. This is a challenge faced by many PhD students receiving fellowship funding.

Further reading: The Complete Guide to Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients

30:47 #5 Expense: Going Out for Fun

Athena budgeted $20 per week for going out, and spent $280 over one semester on happy hours and other social events. She went to bars with friends about once or twice a month for happy hour, where she would socialize for two or three hours. In her budget, Athena distinguishes drinks at a bar or restaurant from purchasing a bottle of wine or six pack from the store. She notes that at NYU, she has plenty of opportunities to enjoy free drinks and free food at events sponsored by the institution.

Join the Mailing List to Download Frugal Tips for PhDs-in-Training

The download includes 30+ frugal tips for PhDs-in-Training with links to video and additional written content.

You'll receive 1-2 emails per week to help you make the most of your money during your PhD training.

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by Kit

34:36 Q3: What are you currently doing to further your financial goals?

Athena tries her best to live within her means. She only lives off of the MacCracken fellowship, about $28,000, which is her only guaranteed income source for 5 years. She puts her other fluctuating funding sources into savings and does not create her budget from it. Athena has a healthy cash savings account, and every now and then she moves it into an investment account with Vanguard for retirement and index funds that could be used for major purchases in 20 to 40 years. She needs her cash savings for her new apartment, new furniture, and irregular expenses.

38:19 Q4: What don’t you spend money on that might surprise people?

Athena doesn’t spend money on transportation. If it’s less than an hour walk, she will walk to the distance. The $2.75 to take the subway or bus is better spend on coffee, in her opinion. She won’t take cabs or ride share unless she absolutely has to.

She makes use of public spaces with internet access and working spaces, like the New York Public Library. Some people pay memberships to writers’ rooms and co-working spaces, or even a desk at home, but Athena has a list of go-to public spaces to work remotely.

Additionally, Athena doesn’t have a gym membership, and she won’t go to exercise classes. She avoids shopping and costly activities. Though she’s surrounded by high income earners in Manhattan, she reminds herself that she has more important priorities than the high expense lifestyle.

43:56 Q5: What are you happy with in your spending and what would you like to change?

Athena would like to change how she tracks her cash spending. Since some places are cash only, and some only take cards, Athena finds it tricky to document all of her expenditures.

She’s happy with how little she spends on exercise activities. Athena is a long distance runner, so she makes use of the long trails and paths throughout New York City. She has a deeply discounted New York Roadrunners membership, and recommends that others look into student discounts.

47:36 Q6: What is your best financial advice for a new PhD student at NYU who is budget-conscious?

First, Athena says that budgeting and spending conservatively is absolutely a must. Many daily necessities, like laundry and groceries, are more expensive than you might expect.

Second, she says do not buy in bulk! Buying only what you need will save money in the long term, as well as save space in small apartments.

51:17 Find out your summer funding situation

Athena recommends being aware of how you will be funded through the summer. In some cases, you will receive payments for only the nine months of the academic year. Some refer to the first summer after graduate school as the “summer of poverty,” so think about this when you get your offer letter. You may need to save during the academic year to get through the summer, or find summer work. Make plans at the beginning of the academic year.

Further reading: How to Financially Navigate an Summer

52:49 Q7: Would you like to make any other comments on what it takes to get by where you live on what you earn?

Athena says you need to be honest about your financial situation. Seeing wealth around you in NYC does not mean you need to spend like that too, or emulate what you see people doing around you. Athena takes the initiative to suggest more frugal activities, like going to coffee or happy hour instead of more costly brunches and dinners.

Athena does an end of the semester assessment of her budget that she finds highly valuable. She evaluates how she spent her money and considers how she can do better the next semester. It can be difficult to anticipate how expensive things will be ahead of time, so she has gone through a process to try things out and reassess her expenses.

58:00 Conclusion

This PhD Student Paid Off $62,000 in Undergrad Student Loans Prior to Graduation

September 10, 2018 by Emily

In this episode, Emily interviews Dr. Jenni Rinker, a mechanical engineering PhD currently working as a researcher at the Denmark Technical University. Jenni paid of $62,000 of student loans from her undergraduate degree while pursuing her PhD at Duke University. Her average payment was approximately $1,500 per month on a post-tax income of $2,700-$3,000 per month. Jenni shares her motivation for setting her lofty debt repayment goal and the practical strategies she used to accomplish it. After paying off her student loans, Jenni even saved enough money to take six months off from work post-defense.

Subscribe on iTunes!

Links mentioned in episode

  • Personal Finance for PhDs Membership Community
  • Jenni’s Budget Spreadsheet
  • Five Strategies to Improve Your Finances Today as a Graduate Student or Postdoc
  • Volunteer as a Guest in Season 2

Introduction

Emily (00:08): Welcome to the Personal Finance for PhDs podcast, a higher education in personal finance. I’m your host, Emily Roberts. The objective of this podcast is to share the financial wisdom of the PhD community. Season one contains two types of episodes, budget breakdowns and money stories. You can find the show notes for this episode at pfforphds.com/s1e5. That’s P-F-F-O-R-P-H-D-S.com/letter S, number one, letter E, number five. On this episode, I interviewed Dr. Jenni Rinker, a mechanical engineer who paid off an unbelievable $62,000 in student loan debt while pursuing her PhD. Jenni applied several classic personal finance principles consistently throughout her amazing debt repayment journey. This story is so inspirational, you’ll be setting your own audacious personal finance goal before it’s even over. Without further ado, here’s my interview with Jenni Rinker.

Please Introduce Yourself

Emily (01:10): Welcome Dr. Jenni Rinker to the podcast. She is my guest today. Jenni’s actually, um, sort of a personal friend of mine and I’ll let her introduce herself a little bit further.

Jenni (01:22): Okay. Well, thanks very much for having me. It’s an honor to be here. I’m really excited to share my experience, to be honest. Um, so yes, as already mentioned, my name is Jenni. I am, uh, a researcher at DTU Wind Energy. So DTU is the Denmark Technical University. Um, I graduated from Harvey Mudd College in 2011, uh, with a bachelor’s in engineering and then I went right into grad school. Um, I went to Duke University and I got a master’s in civil engineering and then a PhD in mechanical engineering. Um, and yeah, and then right after that I came to Denmark for a postdoc at DTU in the loads and control section. And then I liked it so much I’ve decided not to leave.

Emily (02:08): That’s a really exciting story and one not within the scope of what we’re talking about today, but so interesting to maybe follow up with another time. Um, yeah, so Jenni and I have the, I think unusual distinction of having two alma maters in common, both our undergraduate and graduate institutions. Um, although we didn’t overlap actually during undergrad, so we didn’t meet until graduate school. But one of the things that, um, surprised and impressed me about Jenni was that I actually knew a little bit about a debt repayment journey that she went through, which is not something that everybody is comfortable talking about. So when I conceived this podcast, Jenni was at the top of my list for people who I wanted to talk with about a, an amazing financial accomplishment, um, that happened while she was in graduate school. So I’ll let Jenni say really briefly what kind of, at high level what that accomplishment was.

We’re talking today about your debt repayment journey. Can you tell us about this?

Jenni (02:57): Yes. Um, I don’t know if it’s, it’s amazing, but I guess we’ll, we’ll let the, the audience be the judge. Um, so when I graduated from Mudd, uh, we call Harvey Mudd, Mudd. So if I say that, hopefully not to confuse the listeners. Um, it’s a private institution, so the, um, the cost of tuition’s a little high. So I graduated from Mudd with about $62,000 of debt. Um, that was in 2011. Um, and my goal was to repay it during my PhD. Um, and so I paid off $62,000 of debt, um, in a little bit, about three years and seven months I paid it all off.

Can you tell us more about what kinds of loans you had?

Emily (03:34): Wow. That is even faster than I thought it was going to be. Um, I though you might have taken, you know, maybe your whole PhD to do that. Um, ama – wow. Okay. I’m so excited about this story now. Um, yeah. So let’s dive into the starting point a little bit more. Like what kinds of loans were these? Um, maybe what were the interest rates they were at, subsidized, unsubsidized?

Jenni (04:00): Excellent. Okay. So luckily for the both of us, I kept a spreadsheet <laugh> with all of this information.

Emily (04:05): Of course you did. <laugh>.

Jenni (04:06): Yeah, of course. I mean, how else would you track everything? So let me just pull it up real quick. Um, so I had pretty much all unsubsidized loans. So I had, um, both of my parents were generally were an upper middle, upper middle class family, um, which means unfortunately that I don’t really qualify for any unsubsidized, sorry, any subsidized loans. Um, so what I had was kind of a mishmash. Um, I had some government loans that were at 6.8% interest, um, held in Sally Mae and Nelnet at the time. And then I also had private loans. Um, oh yeah. So my government loans, those at 6.8%, that was about 20, almost $28,000. And then my private loans, I had eight and a half thousand that I took out from a program called Alaska Advantage, which I really wish I hadn’t because that was a whopping 7.3% interest rate, which was pretty dang high. And then I had, um, a collection of private loans that I took out from Wells Fargo that because I was taking them out in like 2000, yeah, 2008, 2010, right around the stock market crash, my interest rates were quite low with the private loans. They were like three and a half to 4%. Oh, this one, one of them is higher. But anyway, so I had a collection of private loans that totaled 34,000. Um, and this was an, uh, this is as of September in 2011. And so that also includes that, that total includes the interest that had accrued, um, throughout my, uh, uh, undergrad. So this was like the values basically right after I graduated.

Emily (05:42): Right. Um, okay. So it sounds like a mix of federal and uh, private and also a wide range of interest rate rates there. Um, and then when you, I guess when you started graduate school at Duke in that, you know, September of 2011, uh, what were you working with at that time? Like what was your income approximately versus your expenses, maybe just roughly for the time being?

What was your income during your PhD?

Jenni (06:08): Yeah. So, um, I had an NSF fellowship for the first three years.

Emily (06:12): All right. Congratulations.

Jenni (06:13): Thanks. So that was, I mean, man, what a way to make graduate schools like you. I tell you what. Um, everyone wants you if you have an NSF fellowship. It’s very nice. Um, anyway, that’s a side, that’s a rabbit hole. Um, so I had this NSF fellowship, but then also, um, Duke offered like an extra package on top. So like for the first year I had like a little bit of an extra loan, not loan, a little bit of extra income. Um, but throughout the course of like my time as a graduate student, my income varied anywhere from about, uh, $2,700 per month to actually up to maybe even $3,000, uh, dollars per month. So anywhere from 2,700 to 3,000 roughly. And that actually held kind of steady throughout the course of, um, my PhD.

Emily (06:55): Yeah. I’m curious. So when your NSF ended, so after the first three years, um, did Duke get, like, help you with a higher stipend after that point than what their baseline was?

Jenni (07:06): Yeah. So, um, my section, not my section, my department, um, civil environmental engineering, it’s quite a nice department because what they do is they guarantee that if they give you admission, you are guaranteed five years of funding, which is very convenient. Um, obviously not at, at like a kind of higher level, but they do guarantee some sort of, you know, baseline tuition, which is nice. So you don’t have to worry about having forced, being forced to master out. Um, that being said, after my NSF ran out, I immediately got, I started applying for a different fellowship. And so my fourth year was basically covered then by this other fellowship, um, by the office of science. Um, and that actually funded a one year external stay at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Colorado. Um, so that’s kind of what covered. And that actually was monthly $3,000 pre-tax. Unfortunately they didn’t tax it, which was unfortunate because then you had to like, you know, pay attention to taxes, which is really annoying in my opinion. But, um, so that was $3,000 pre-tax.

Emily (08:08): I’ll just say for the, for the listeners, Duke is unusual in that they actually offer tax, income tax withholding on outside fellowships like NSF. Um, whereas most universities actually don’t do that. So you were actually fortunate that you only had to deal with estimated tax for a smaller period of time during not the entire time. Yeah. Duke is very unusual.

Jenni (08:29): So I was spoiled. Oh man. All right.

Emily (08:31): But they also give us super weird tax forms that cause everybody lots of headaches. So there’s pluses and minuses there.

Jenni (08:37): Like the 1099 MISC and stuff. Yeah. That makes sense now. Hindsight. <laugh>

Emily (08:44): Um, and then your fifth year, was that fellowship as well or was that from funding?

Jenni (08:49): I kind of did. So I actually finished my PhD in like four and a half years. Um, so I defended in like February. And then the way my timing worked out at NREL, I only had like three months gap between my NSF fellowship and then the, the NREL fellowship. So Duke was kind enough to just cover me for those three, um, those three months. And then also, um, I think, yeah, I kept getting income actually <laugh>, um, after I defended as well because I was trying to finish up some papers. Um, but I think that was just, I think that was my, my, um, department being kind and saying like, “Okay, well you had four years of funding. Like we can, we can get you these extra like couple months here and there.”

Emily (09:31): No kidding. <laugh> Yeah. You hustled for much of that stipend. So, um, and then just to kind of clear the board about your starting point, did you have any significant assets at that time that you could, could or ended up putting towards the debt? Or was it just kind of like sort of starting from this point of just having debt? 

Jenni (09:52): No, I didn’t, I didn’t have any assets. I mean, I did do a summer, um, like a summer kind of internship thing. So I got some income from that and I did, I don’t unfortunately have the numbers, but I did earn more than I spent. And so I was able to start paying off my loans over the summer, but things got really chaotic, um, in 2011 because, so I did the summer program, but then I moved to Duke. So there was also like moving costs and then, you know, buying furniture and stuff. So that’s why a lot of my record keeping doesn’t start until September because the whole summer is just chaos. Um, but no significant-

Emily (10:25): I definitely relate to that.

Jenni (10:27): Yeah. Moving across country and stuff. Um, but yeah, no significant assets, no, um, yeah, no house I could sell and no, no, uh, no stock, stocks, none of that.

Why were you so determined to pay off student loans during grad school?

Emily (10:36): Yeah. So you were starting from that negative point that a lot of people coming out of college were starting from and you were going into graduate school. So you knew that that income was going to be capped and quite limited for a large number of years. So the question is why were you so determined that you were going to pay off this debt during graduate school? Why did you set that goal for yourself? Because a lot of people would take the position of my loans can be deferred. I don’t have to make any payments. It’s going to be a challenging time anyway, even without setting that extra goal. Like why did you decide to do that?

Jenni (11:10): Um, I think for me it was, it was kind of like a philosophical choice or like a personal choice. I, I really just don’t like owing loans or people. And the other thing too is like, because my loans were not subsidized, you know, yeah, technically I don’t have to pay during grad school, but the interest is still accruing. Like that’s still more money that I’m going to have to pay back in the end. Um, so it didn’t make sense to me to like, I don’t know, go ahead and buy like 10,000 flat screen TVs or whatever I could have actually bought. Um, it made more sense to actually just get rid of those loans. And then the other thing too is because then if I left, um, if I left grad school then, and I still had all of these loans, I was going to be kind of trapped into paying them. And it really kind of like, if I decided to go, I don’t know, be a bum for a year and travel the world, you can’t do that. Well, you can, but it definitely makes it a lot harder. Um, so-

Emily (12:02): So it sounds like it was a lot about freedom for you, like just there was this burden, um, even though you weren’t obligated to start paying it right away, you felt, um, you know, it hit your gut. Like you felt that you needed to pay this off faster so that you could sort of be unchained from it.

Jenni (12:18): Yeah. I think that’s a, that’s a really good, that’s a really good observation. I just didn’t like, you know, exactly like the chain, I just didn’t like having this weight over my head. And then also the, the knowledge that each day that weight is growing. Like yeah, you don’t see it unless you pay attention, but it’s there. So I think, yeah, I think that’s, that’s kind of why I knew I wanted to at least try to pay off my loans. And then to be honest, I think the decision to do it during my PhD was initially just completely like a random goal. I was like, “Yeah, let’s do it.” And I didn’t actually look at like whether or not it was financially feasible. I was just like, “Let’s just make it work.” And then eventually I did some calculations. I was like, “Okay, now, this is feasible. It’s all right.” <laugh>

Emily (12:55): But – Yeah, that was gonna be my next question, whether or not you had sort of thought about whether or not it was even accomplishable. But no, you’re just like gonna dive in. <laugh> I’m gonna just set this audacious goal and go for it. Um, you know, no matter what the logistics of the situation. But they did work out.

Jenni (13:10): Right. Well, so it did end up being a lot more manageable than I expected. And we’ll get into the details, but yeah. So, um, I think that’s, that’s one way in which I got kind of lucky. Like, you know, to the, the bottom line is that in order to pay off debt, like you need to be able to have your income be higher than your expenses, of course. And like, you know, it’s that profit margin that allows you to pay off loans more quickly or more slowly. And I just got lucky enough that the way I was living and the way, you know, I had income and stuff, which we’ll probably get into a little bit later, um, I was able to do that and still also enjoy the quality of life that I value. So it was, it was kind of like lucky in the way it all played out, but there was also some planning as well.

How did you pay off your student loans?

Emily (13:52): Yeah. Sounds like it. Well, let’s get into those details then. So how did you do this? Like how? <laugh>

Jenni (14:01): Magic, no. <laugh> Um, yeah. So I, um, there’s a kind of financial philosophy that I still hold true, which is like, they basically, my money that I earn from my job, um, that’s what goes towards, you know, like rent, utilities, uh, food. If I have loans, then those get paid off. Um, and then, then like, then I can skin off, skim off the top and do stuff with it. But if I wanna do things like, so, so during this time that I did pay off my loans, I also did like several trips actually for fun. Like I spent two weeks in New Zealand on vacation. Um, I went to Montreal for two weeks for a, a competition. Um, I went to Moab, Utah for another like weekend kind of competition thing. Um, so, and all of these, like, these are like, for me, those are the, the quality of life things that I was talking about. And the way that I told myself I had to pay for those is like that money was not generally allowed to come from my income. That had to be something else. And so what I did on the side that I had like my kind of, uh, side job was, um, primarily, uh, technical copy editing. So I would kind of had some private clients and then also I worked for a company called American Journal Experts. So what they do is they just hire you to basically copy edit, uh, technical papers that have been written by people who don’t speak English as the first language. Um, so, so you’re not really editing kind of the content, but you’re just kind of changing the grammar and making the flow sound like a native English speaker wrote it. So that was kind of my side gig that I really enjoyed doing because it kind of allowed me to get this extra income that then I could spend in a way guilt free, right? I didn’t have to feel bad like, oh, this income could go towards my loans. It’s like, no, I did this extra, this is outside. This is what I can do to, this is the money that I can use to, you know, go to New Zealand, go to India, go to wherever.

Emily (15:57): Yeah, this is a strategy that I’ve actually taught about, um, multiple times in the past, which is, um, when you set up a side income, dedicate it to a specific purpose, post-tax, dedicate it to a specific purpose because then you know every time you work, you know, put the hours in towards that side income, you’re saying, I’m working so I can go to XYZ location for this purpose. Like you know what you’re making that sacrifice for. Um, it makes it a lot more palatable to put in that time because you know exactly where that money’s going to end up going. Um, so I love that strategy. Did you do that throughout your entire graduate school experience or like when did you get started with the side income?

Jenni (16:35): You know, I think I started maybe like one year into my PhD or something. There was a flyer up on, on a wall somewhere at Duke and I was like, “Oh, that might be interesting.” So I kind of like, I was like, “I, I think I don’t suck at editing.” So I kind of, uh, applied. And then it’s, it’s actually still something that I do now. Um, sometimes I had to, well, anyway. Um, but yeah. So, so that was, that was kind of one thing in terms of like I kind of adding, augmenting my income that kind of allowed me to ensure the quality of life that I enjoyed. Um, but the thing that I haven’t really mentioned yet that was probably the most important thing, um, is spreadsheets. So I had, um, a budget. I had a, a, you know, each year I had my spreadsheet and then each spreadsheet had a tab where each tab was a month. So I would track like, okay, so this is my income from Duke University each month. And then I would say, okay, here’s my rent, here’s my utilities, here’s my stuff. And then I had like, and my goal, like, and then I, after I kind of did my calculations, I was like, all right, if I want to pay off my loans in four years, my goal was four years because I also wanted to finish my PhD around four, four and a half years. Um, I needed to put away about $1,300 per month roughly. So I was earning around $2,700 to $3,000 and then I was paying around $1,300 a month pretty much.

Emily (17:54): That’s an incredible ratio. I mean that, that’s a lofty goal to set for yourself. Um, in terms of the percentage that it works out to be, and especially because of that sort of lower, not for a graduate student, but for the general population, lower, um, starting income. Yeah, that’s really incredible that you put away that high percentage.

Jenni (18:13): Well, there were, there were a couple things I had going for me. Um, number one is I had some low rent. So my rent or like my uti – like rent utilities and all of that was around eight or $900 per month. Um, like and that includes, you know, car insurance, I think gas as well. I don’t remember 100%. Um, so I, then that left me kind of enough to spare over. And then I also, I wasn’t really one for like going out to dinner very often. I didn’t really go out to bars very often. Not because I felt like I was restricting myself, but because I would rather spend that money, um, you know, traveling, for example. Like that’s, that was what I enjoyed. So that’s what I did. 

Emily (18:50): So it sounds like you had a solid calculation of what, what’s called like your monthly nut, like what absolutely has to go out the door to pay for your basic expenses. And then you had this large, um, you know, amount of money that you, you wanted to put towards your loans to, to finish within the timeframe that you said. And then you had some other discretionary spending, but it wasn’t really, sounds like you’re sort of a naturally frugal person, um, not wanting to live an extravagant lifestyle. Or rather, like you said, knowing where your priorities were, which was in travel rather than going out sort of on a day to day or, or week to week basis.

Jenni (19:25): Yeah. I think, um, and the other, the other strategy that I employed that actually helped a lot was like every payday, like right after payday, I made my loan payment. Um, so like once, you know, you have that big bank account, that’s when I was like, “All right, $1,300, it’s going away right now.” Um, that did kind of put me into like, it did mean that like my emergency fund wasn’t quite as big as it should have been. Um, but luckily like I managed to, like I did at one point like have my car break and so I did have to pull from my emergency fund, which like completely tanked it and then I never built it back up. Um, but I got kind of lucky in that respect. Like I didn’t have any massive emer – um, financial emergencies. Um, and I’m trying to think. Yeah, but all, yeah, at least for me, like the trick of like getting paid and then immediately sending your loan away so you basically don’t see the money, that’s really, because then at the end of the month you’re like, “Oh, I would love to buy for me, like I love buying cake. I love cake.” So I was like, “Oh, I’d love cake.” And I was like, “Oh, I, I don’t have money to buy cake.” I’m like, “All right, that’s fine. I didn’t need the cake anyway.”

Emily (20:30): Um, yeah, that strategy is more, is commonly known as paying yourself first. And I, I agree it’s totally amazingly powerful. Um, did you, when you were making that $1,300 month payment, did you have that auto pay or was that something you did manually every single month?

Jenni (20:45): Yeah. So that’s something I did manually. And the reason that I did it manually is because, um, so my ultimate goal, of course, was paying off the loans in, in part as quickly as possible, but also in paying as little back as, as little, um, overall, like in, in total. So that meant that I needed to pay off the highest interest loans first. Um, and so I would have to like go through my spreadsheet, my, uh, my other spreadsheet that tracked my loans and say, okay, so what do I have that’s left? Um, which of these has the highest interest rate? And like, okay, let’s, let’s pull that. And then I would just like, and I had this like list of all my loans and then every time I paid one off, I would like gray out the text. So then when I copied the tab for the next month, like that one was basically, it was gone. Um, and it got a little tricky when I got to like Wells Fargo, for example, because I had like four different private loans from them. And if you just like make an online payment, they won’t let you pick like, I want my money to go to this loan. They’ll just, they’ll distribute it accordingly and probably in whatever fashion will allow them to make the most money. So what I had to do was like, I think I had to send a check in, I had to send in multiple checks, like if, or like, and you have to like specify on the check, like this check goes to this loan. Um, so that part, yeah, that part required a little bit more, again, bookkeeping and spreadsheets.

Emily (22:09): Yeah. It sounds like that was a really, um, as you were saying, a crucial tool for you is these spreadsheets, keeping track of everything. And this, um, I want to dive a little bit more into this particular strategy of paying off the highest interest rate loan first because I think this is really more widely applicable. So as you noted, lenders do not always, uh, cooperate, make this easy for you to do. Um, so you had to really go in and figure out for each different lender how you were going to prioritize paying off one particular loan. How to communicate with them. That’s what you needed to do. Um, so I’m wondering, did you, um, because your loans were deferred at the time, I suppose you could have literally just paid on one loan at a time. And it sounds like you were prioritizing to some degree, but did you also make payments kind of across all of them or it was really just one at a time?

Jenni (22:59): Yes. I completely prioritized. I was like, so for example, that Alaska Advantage loan that was like 7.3% or something like that. I was like, okay, that’s the worst one. And also that had a pretty hefty balance too, because I originally took out 8,500 on it. In fact, it was my biggest loan, both in principle and then it had the highest interest rate. So I was like, well, that one’s going to get paid off first. So I just attacked that one, so to speak. And just every, every month I was like, this is all it’s going to. And then when that one died, then I was like, okay, next up is this one. And like you said, because I was in deferment, I was able to completely, uh, prioritize my own way, like which loans could be paid. Um, and I don’t even think I sent, um, and I can check, let me look at the spreadsheet real quick. Um, I don’t think that I even bothered. I think everything was like this month goes to, yeah, for example, yeah, my first, first month of payment paid $1,800 to Alaska Advantage and then Alaska Advantage. And then, and then I have a list of like, okay, now I’m paying to Wells Fargo, now I’m paying to Wells Fargo, now I’m paying to this. So everything was basically only on, I would only pay to multiple loans if I had enough to like pay off one loan and continue with another one.

Emily (24:16): Gotcha. Yeah. So this, um, technique is called the debt avalanche method. I don’t know if you’re familiar with that term.

Jenni (24:22): And the snowball is the other one? Is that right?

Emily (24:24): Yeah. So for the listeners, what Jenni’s describing is the debt avalanche method. And this is as opposed to the debt snowball method. And so with each one of these methods, and they’re both really powerful and sort of in different ways, um, with each one of these methods, you make a list, a prioritized list of all of your different loans. And something like student loans, we often think of as one line item, student loans, balance. But actually in this case, you need to do, you need to break it out into every single individual loan that you’ve taken out, uh, every different lender, all the different years, et cetera. So, you know, Jenni, you had a large handful of loans, it sounds like.

Emily (24:59): Yeah. So nine different loans, not just one, nine different line items and prioritize them. And so with the debt avalanche method, you prioritize based on, um, interest rate and you would pay the minimums on everything if required, which in your case it wasn’t. And then just attack, attack, attack, like you said, that top priority loan with the highest interest rate first. This is as opposed to the debt snowball method where you would prioritize based on loan balance. And that, but in that method, you pay off the smallest balance first. So with this debt snowball, it’s sort of like, um, a psychologically motivating process to get one debt paid off completely before moving on to the next. Start with the smallest one because that gives you the easiest win. But in your case, you did exactly the opposite because you just said you went for your largest loan, which had the highest interest rate first. Um, but I, I’m a little bit partial to the debt avalanche method as well. It sounds like as a fellow spreadsheet lover, you are too. And so you were really motivated by the math and imagining, you know, that debt accruing a larger and larger balance every single day that went by with that high interest rate.

Jenni (26:03): Yeah. I mean, bottom line was just I wanted to pay back in the end as little as possible. And so then mathematically it made sense to get rid of the highest interest loans first. So I was like, all right, well, let’s, let’s do that, you know, so.

Emily (26:15): Yeah. Well, you’ve already illustrated like so many great, um, sort of techniques and strategies for debt repayment or, you know, sort of in general for money management. Was there anything else that you did? Any additional strategies?

Jenni (26:29): I don’t think there’s anything that I really employed, but that’s because, you know, in general, like I wasn’t in such a tight financial situation that I needed to be, needed to be very careful. Um, I’m actually in a situation now where I do need to be a little more careful financially, almost more careful than I was in grad school. So some things that I employ now include like, um, kind of identifying my weak points and like where I tend to overspend. Um, it’s, there’s like a certain, I’ve noticed there’s like a certain, uh, case where I’ll be like, oh, I’ll just buy, like I tend to spend a lot more now like going out to eat, for example, um, or like getting fast food kind of thing. So I’m trying to be more careful on being aware of that. And then if even being aware isn’t enough, then actually what I’ll do is I’ll take out cash and I’ll say like, this is what you have, you’re not allowed to use your card, because definitely when I, when I use my card is when I don’t realize how much I’m spending. Um, so that’s one thing. Um, I still stick to the paying myself first, um, each month because that’s, um, again, if I don’t have, if I’ve already paid myself, then I can’t, uh, I can’t use the, uh, use the money later in an unwise decision. So I think, um, yeah, I think between the budgets and then also just, you know, trying to be more care – be more aware of what I’m spending and what I’m spending on, um, that’s probably my main, my main weapons, so to speak.

Commercial

Emily (27:50): And now, a brief break from the interview. If you want to have conversations about money with other PhDs, like the one I’m having in this interview, I invite you to join the Personal Finance for PhDs membership community. Inside the community, we encourage and equip one another to make meaningful financial strides no matter what your income. Please go to pfforphds.com/membership-community to find out more and sign up. Now back to the interview.

Did you have any speed bumps during your debt repayment journey?

Emily (28:23): So you already mentioned once that you had like a car breakdown that you had to access your emergency fund during graduate school. Was there any other time where you kind of came upon something that was a bit of a speed bump in this journey or was it pretty much, “Nope, I’m paying myself first. It’s my top priority,” and nothing kind of, um, you know, derailed you from that?

Jenni (28:43): You know, I think I got really lucky and I, I didn’t have any big financial setbacks. Um, in general, like I had some, like occasionally, if anything, I have kind of financial help, like weird, unexpected help. Um, in, in the case, like, for example, like I went to a conference and then I got a per diem and then I didn’t spend all the per diem, so then I had like a little bit extra money kind of thing. Um, just a couple small things like that kind of came along and that really, really helped kind of send the loans, send more money to the loans or be a little more aggressive, which is why I ended up paying it back faster than I expected.

Emily (29:19): Yeah, so you had this schedule where you were supposed to pay $1,300 a month, but it sounds like sometimes you threw something more at it.

Jenni (29:27): Yeah. I calculated the average and it looks like I was actually paying about 1,500 per month overall. On average. So that’s, that’s cool. <laugh> I didn’t even realize that till I calculated that number today.

Emily (29:40): Yeah. So not only did you set up this, in your own mind, regular payment schedule, but in addition, you threw whatever else came your way towards those loans. Yeah, it was clearly, clearly a high priority, um, for you. So when you got to three years, three and a half years into this journey and you made the last payment on your loans, like what happened? Like how did you feel or, or, you know, did anything change in your life?

How did you feel after paying off your student loans? Did anything change in your life?

Jenni (30:07): Um, I felt amazing first thing. I was, it was so nice to be like, wow, that’s, that’s done. That’s, that’s something that not a lot of people do. So it’s always kind of cool when you’re just like, wow, I’ve, I’ve done something kind of unusual. Like in a good way, right? Like if you do something unusual and it’s because you fell down the stairs, then you feel bad. But, um –

Emily (30:27): I remember actually that I think you posted on Facebook at the time. Um, and you got so many congratulations, which is like wonderful to see.

Jenni (30:36): Yeah, I did. I, yeah, that was definitely, I was like, all right, I’m gonna brag on Facebook. <laugh>.

Emily (30:41): Yeah. Very, very brag worthy.

Jenni (30:43): Yeah. It was, it was just, it was just so nice to have that off my, off my brain, off my chest, I guess. I, it just, yeah. And, and like I said, because remember the whole, the whole thing was kind of motivated by my mental image of this being like a weight over my head. So, so it really was freeing, like you’ve noted. I was then free to be like, wow, okay. So, and I wasn’t done with school either. I still had this income. So I was like, okay, so now instead of spending $1,300 each month on my loans, I can do anything what I want with it. And then naturally me, I was so used to just like taking that money and just throwing it into a, into a hole. I was like, well, let’s keep doing that. But instead of it being like a hole owned by the man, quote unquote, let’s have it be my own like pot of money. And so I, what I did is I started saving up for travel. And so I planned, I was like, okay, well, you’re going to defend in February and then let’s plan in a six month gap where I can just travel and use this pot of money to go somewhere, anywhere, places. So that’s what, that’s what I did. Um, I started saving up like every month I would take my $1,300 and I would put it away and I had a separate spreadsheet that’s like, here’s how much money you have for this month, um, for this, uh.

Emily (31:57): Must have felt so amazing to be in the black instead of in the red at that time and watching that balance just accumulate so fast.

Jenni (32:04): It was, it was, it was so cool. Yeah. And then it was, and then also it really then allowed me so much more like stress free travel the whole next, you know, six months after I graduated. It was like, great, I graduated. I went to Patagonia for two months. I like drove around the US for a month and then I went all around Europe for another two months, two and a half months, something like that. And I didn’t have to worry about like, oh crap, where’s this money coming from? Because I had it. And then I also knew that I had a job waiting for me in September or August. So I knew like I would again have income. It was perfectly fine to spend all this and just enjoy myself. Um, so it was, it was amazing. It was really cool. <laugh>

Emily (32:44): Yeah. I can’t, I mean, I, I would imagine there are very few people who end a PhD program and have the means to take such a significant amount of time off. Sounds like you got all your ducks in a row with your employment and everything set up and it was a true vacation, um, you know, to celebrate finishing, to celebrate your, you know, debt repayment accomplishment, uh, all of that. I mean, just that’s incredible that you were able to do that.

Jenni (33:11): Yeah. I got, I got pretty lucky with my financial situation and then I just started, started, uh, planning early, I think. And I just tried to keep like, keep looking two steps ahead because normally I’m actually not very good at that. So I was like, all right, let’s just get things kind of lined up down the road and then we can figure everything else out, um, a little bit later. So it, it ended up working out really well.

Emily (33:32): And was that a rejuvenating time off? Like did you, when you started your full-time employment, you know, resumed it did you feel ready? <laugh> More ready than you would have been if you had taken, you know, one week off?

Jenni (33:44): Words cannot express. <laugh> Um, yeah. I’m also like I, I kind of like during grad school was, I actually didn’t even really realize that traveling was so important to me until like partway through grad school. I was like, man, there are places in the world that are beautiful and I have never seen them. So it started to become kind of more and more important to me. And so that’s kind of how like in the back of my mind, I think it was like, oh yeah, let’s, let’s, let’s plan in some traveling. And so the fact that I was able to do that, um, I think it, it just put me in a whole different frame of mind when I, you know, kind of got to Denmark finally and was like, all right, let’s try this postdoc thing. It was just, um, yeah, it was like completely resetting my brain and it was, it was very nice.

Is there anything you wish you had done differently?

Emily (34:30): Is there anything from your whole debt repayment journey that you, in retrospect, wish you had done differently?

Jenni (34:38): Let’s see. That’s a good question. I think I probably, I probably should have kept a little closer eye on my emergency fund. Um, like I already noted, I did kind of tank it at one point and then I didn’t build it back up again. Um, and I got lucky in that I didn’t have a substantial financial emergency, but I probably should have kept that a little fuller. Um, but I think overall I’m, I’m mildly satisfied. I’m not mildly. I’m, I’m satisfied <laugh> with, um, with how the whole thing played out. Um, I can’t think of a way that I could have like shaved off some income, you know, and maybe paid it off more quickly. I think I was, I was toeing the line for me what’s acceptable between like being frugal but also having a good quality of life. So I, I don’t think I would actually have changed too much of, of how I, how I handled it.

Emily (35:33): Yeah. It sounds like it. I had a similar, um, view of my small emergency fund during graduate school, like, yeah, that probably should have been bigger, but nothing, nothing bad happened, you know, nothing, nothing that, that, uh, put me in, you know, credit card debt or anything like that. So it’s kind of like Well, I got away with it.

Emily (35:55): Yeah. And I guess in your case, I mean, it sounds like you maybe didn’t even consider this, but in your case you could have just not made that month’s, you know, $1,300 payment if something had come up because you had that cash flow, uh, because you weren’t required to make payments. Sounds like it didn’t happen. Did you even consider that, like not making your full payment at any point?

Jenni (36:15): There’s definitely, there’s a couple months I was looking, there are a couple months where like I paid less, but then somehow, and I, I have to admit, this is where I, I wasn’t like completely fully prepared, um, or I didn’t prepare as much as I would have liked because I was looking and I was like, because I know I did that at some point, like there would be one month where I wouldn’t pay as much or like I would skip a month or something. Um, yeah, like here this month I only paid 600, but then somehow the next month I paid like almost double. So I’m not really sure in the end how it all worked out. Um, but yeah, I think I just tried to –

Emily (36:53): It sounds like you were, you were being a little bit flexible because some months you were paying quite a bit more than your goal. And so on the occasional month paying a little bit less than your goal was not, ultimately it did not, you know, add up to extending the repayment period. Uh, because you were also focused on paying more when you were able to.

Jenni (37:10): Yeah. I think that’s the main thing is like, because in the, for the first year, um, I had, um, I had kind of an extra income. So I was like closer to 3,000 than I was to like 2,700 post-tax. So I think that kind of allowed me the chance to kind of front load in a sense and I was able to pay off kind of more aggressively in the beginning and then it kind of, kind of evened out. I think also to be honest, I also had the image in my head as like if something financially drastic happens, like my parents are kind enough that they will temporarily bail me out because I know that I will pay them back at some point. Um, so it was never, it was never to me so such a concern. Like if something were to happen, I knew that it wouldn’t be like the end of the world. I was like, okay, my mom won’t like it, but she’ll be able to help me out short term and then I’ll pay her back kind of thing. 

Did this experience affect how you approach personal finance?

Emily (38:00): So you had some sort of plans, even if they weren’t, you know, cash in your bank account, you had some, well, I can turn here, I can turn here. Yeah. I think that’s, that’s quite common. Um, okay. So you’ve already touched on this a little bit, but like I would imagine that this debt repayment process was transformative for you in how you dealt with your personal finances. And so is there any, have there been any lingering kind of effects on how you manage your money due to this experience?

Jenni (38:32): Yeah. I think, um, well, I did, I think it was, it’s almost more interesting to ask like once I got to Denmark and then no longer had this debt, kind of how I handled it. And I would, I would say it was interesting because I, like I stopped tracking income basically. I stopped tracking expenses and I definitely could tell that I got a lot more sloppy with how I was spending things. I was just kind of like, I’m going to buy this thing that I don’t need and this thing. And for me, a lot of my extra incomes are on food because I just like, I have trouble resisting fast food, for example. So I’ll go and be like, oh, that’s a good looking cinnamon roll. And then things in Denmark are expensive. So if you buy like a cinnamon roll like each day, it surprisingly adds up really quickly <laugh>. Um, right. So <laugh> I think now that I’ve kind of gone back to being a little more, um, cognizant of where my expenses are going, I think the, the, the budget spreadsheet that I ended up using is probably my most useful tool, um, for keeping an eye on, okay, so what do I have? What can I spend and what am I spending? Um, because I think then that, that tracking and that ability to kind of reflect upon how you’re spending things is probably the most valuable thing. Um, so I think probably the first like practice that I’m, that I’m engaging again now that I think was super valuable was the use of the budget sheet. Um, and then kind of how I would categorize like different expenses and then keep track of like multiple things. Um, that’s been super useful. 

Emily (40:04): Can I ask a small follow up question about this spreadsheet system that you’ve set up? Um, did you grab these templates from anywhere or is this something completely of your own creation?

Jenni (40:13): No, I ended up making one of my own creation. Um, maybe it was inspired by someone else’s, but, um, it definitely has turned into something that’s like, I have like the columns that I like, like I have food in one column and then I have like kind of utilities in one column. Um, and it just, for me, it, it kind of makes sense, um, how I track it. So I’ll happily share that if, if, uh, people think it’d be useful. I don’t mind at all. Um, but yeah, so that’s –

Emily (40:41): Did you also ever consider using software or look into it?

Jenni (40:45): Yeah, I did. I was, I heard really good things about Mint, uh, mint.com I think it’s called. And so I did look into it at one point, but I couldn’t, like there was something about at the time it couldn’t access all of my loans, I think. Um, and then I’m also, I’m a little bit, I don’t want to say analog because obviously I was still on a computer, but, um, I like a little bit more control. And then I think I just didn’t take the time to learn it properly. Mint, mint.com or perhaps some other financial software probably could have done exactly what I did and perhaps even in a more, um, efficient fashion. Um, but the thing that I did like about actual, actually actively, um, putting it into the spreadsheet is it kind of like at, increased my engagement with like the debt tracking process because I actually started asking for receipts all the time and then I would keep the receipts in my wallet and then I would take them, take the receipts and I would manually like put them in, which this is definitely not something everyone will want to do. Like some people will find that way too much work. But for me, it was a very eye opening process because it was like, okay, so I have these like five receipts and they’re all from the cafe and they all have like four different items. Obviously I’m spending a little bit too much at the cafe. Maybe next time I go, I’ll like bring a sandwich and just buy a coffee. Something like that. Um, it was kind of like the actual act of like putting it into the spreadsheet and watching the numbers change that really kind of made me actually think about how I was spending my money.

Emily (42:12): Yeah, that’s something that I really like about these manual tracking methods, um, or budgeting or, you know, the debt repayment, you know, tracking or whatever it is, um, is that it does force, if you’re, if you’re committed to it, it does force that higher level of engagement and awareness, um, which is wonderful. So I, when I, uh, first started out, I was also using spreadsheets and loved it. Um, and it was only after I got married that, um, my husband and I started using software because he was not willing to put in that kind of time to doing the manual tracking. Yeah. So like the whole joint finances thing, uh, made software a better solution for us, but I still kind of lo – you know, have a soft spot for the manual tracking and, and the, uh, the benefits that come from it.

Jenni (42:58): Yeah, yeah. For sure.

What advice would you give to someone starting graduate school with student loans?

Emily (43:00): So let’s move on to kind of like final thoughts here. Um, is there any advice that you would give someone else in your, you know, going back to 2011 when you graduated from college, you had this high debt load. What would you say to maybe another person starting graduate school in a similar situation?

Jenni (43:18): Yeah. I think, um, I think first off it’s going to be kind of go ahead and like evaluate your financial situation and figure out like what your income is and then, um, was it the nut you called it? Like the core things?

Emily (43:30): Monthly nut. Yeah.

Jenni (43:31): The monthly nut, like, is that like what you have to spend?  Is that what – Okay. Yeah. And I would say like start by just figuring out what your income is, what your monthly nut is, and then seeing what the difference is, because if that difference isn’t that large. Okay, let me, let me say first rule of thumb, realistic financial expectations. Um, you know, I, I had a situation where I was able to do this, but it’s because of course my income was this and my expenses were that, yada, yada. So, you know, it’s, you know, you can’t take exactly what I did and apply it to scenario if you have a different income, if you have a different monthly nut. So I think the first thing is going to be kind of look at what you have and figure out what is realistic for you and what will also make sure you have an adequate quality of life. Um, and kind of evaluate and see like where are your problem areas? Do you tend to overspend in electronics? Maybe why do you do that? Can you buy refurbished? Do you necessarily need the new iPhone? Or if you want the new iPhone, then supplement your income through a different way so that you say, okay, so each month I’ll do this, I’ll earn extra $100 and then after 10 months or however long, uh, you can then buy your fancy new iPhone. Um, I would say just kind of, kind of, yeah, identify your problem areas, realize what is actually realistic. You know, if you’re saying like, I’m going to live off of baked beans the whole month and then I will pay off my loans. I mean, perhaps if that makes you happy, go for it. But if you try that for a month or two and it’s not working, I think it’s time to reevaluate your strategy. Um, so I guess there’s, then that’s two things. Number one is realistic goals. And then number two, don’t be afraid to reevaluate your strategy. Um, because we all make mistakes and this isn’t something that we’re born learning and it’s not even something that we’re really taught in schools. So we kind of have to educate ourselves, which makes it different, difficult. Um, and then we have to learn from our mistakes.

Emily (45:25): Yeah. And to me, you know, the, the PhD is such a long journey. Um, if you start off with a strategy that doesn’t end up being sustainable, like that’s okay. Like you have more time. Um Exactly. You can learn from even not necessarily your mistakes, but the successes that you’ve had, the mistakes that you’ve made, all of that. And there’s a lot of time to keep applying that, um, even before you finish graduate school. And I know that I, at any rate, um, evolved in my practice of personal finance quite a lot over the time that I was in graduate school and ended in a really good place, but didn’t, you know, started in a totally different place. And there was a lot of time for that learning and application to happen. Yeah. Um, but I love that you emphasize kind of figuring out like what your priorities are. And you can’t do everything, right, on your limited grad student income. So if one main priority is debt repayment, then maybe you can have one or two like other priorities like for you, travel, but you made that happen through your extra income. Um, yeah, just having that awareness of what is really important to you because you can’t do everything and you don’t, and you don’t want to. Like there are some things that are going to be more important to you than others. Um, so yeah. Any more last comments?

Jenni (46:40): Um, no. I think, um, this has been really fun to, to chat. So I, I hopefully, I guess, I guess I, my comment would just be I, my heartfelt hope that, uh, this is useful to people and perhaps make some kind of look at their financial strategy and see if there’s something they want to change.

Final Comments

Emily (46:58): I think it will be. Um, you know, you have a very inspiring story, but it’s also clear, I think this, you explained very clearly the strategies that you used that are going to be applicable to anyone really in any kind of debt repayment scenario whether that’s during graduate school student loans or, you know, any other time, uh, any other type of debt and time of life and so forth. So yeah, thank you so much for, um, sharing those strategies so, so well and, and also for accessing your meticulous records <laugh> so that we can have, you know, an, an accurate conversation here. Um.

Jenni (47:29): Well, I get to thank previous, previous self for that. <laugh>. Previous O- OCD’s help.

Emily (47:35): Yeah. Um, well thank you so much, Jenni, uh, for coming on the podcast today. Um, I think it was a wonderful conversation.

Jenni (47:42): Thank you, Emily. This was super fun and I very much enjoyed it.

Outro

Emily (47:47): I want to send a huge thank you to Jenni for being my guest on the show today. Jenni has graciously made her budgeting and tracking Excel spreadsheet available for download. You can find a link to it in the show notes or go directly to pfforphds.com/s1E5-budget. If you would like to learn more about and apply some of the principles discussed in the episode and a few others, go to pfforphds.com/subscribe and register for my mailing list. You’ll receive a PDF that details five strategies you can employ today to improve your finances. The steps are designed to create maximum effect with minimum effort. I’m currently looking for guests for season two of the podcast. So if you’d like to volunteer to break down your budget or share a money story, please visit pfforphds.com/podcast. Please subscribe to the Personal Finance for PhDs podcast on iTunes. During season one, I’ll release episodes on the second and fourth Monday of each month between July and December 2018. See you in the next episode. The music is Sounds of Awakening by Poddington Bear from the Free Music Archive and is shared under CC by NC.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Sign Up for More Awesome Content

I'll send you my 2,500-word "Five Ways to Improve Your Finances TODAY as a Graduate Student or Postdoc."

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by Kit

Copyright © 2026 · Atmosphere Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • About Emily Roberts
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact