Personal Finance for PhDs

Live a financially balanced life - no Real Job required

Emily

This Grad Student Advocates for Higher Stipends Using Cost of Living Data

by

In this episode, Emily interviews Alex Parry, a sixth-year graduate student at Johns Hopkins in the history of medicine. Alex is a strong advocate for increasing stipends both in his department and at Hopkins broadly and is deeply involved with the grad student unionization movement. Alex and some colleagues recently released the results of a study of stipends vs. the living wage for about a dozen peer institutions to Hopkins, and he explains in detail the methodology of the study and the patterns that they found, making a case for the urgency to increase stipends at virtually all US universities. Emily and Alex discuss the benefits of this approach vs. how PhDStipends.com collects data. Alex shares a powerful concluding message on the need for collective action among graduate students.

Links Mentioned in this Episode

S12E7 Image: This Grad Student Advocates for Higher Stipends Using Cost of Living Data

Teaser

00:00 Alex: But ultimately, our ability to get what we need as adults and as employees of these universities done is contingent on what kind of pressure we are able to bring to bear. And what data we’re able to bring to bear. And the data are only a starting point, right? They provide the talking points you need, they provide the evidence you need. They provide the ability to do the negotiations, right? But ultimately, we will succeed or fail collectively. And we will succeed or fail on the base of our ability to sort of band together to demand what we rightfully deserve.

Introduction

00:37 Emily: Welcome to the Personal Finance for PhDs Podcast: A Higher Education in Personal Finance. I’m your host, Dr. Emily Roberts, a financial educator specializing in early-career PhDs and the founder of Personal Finance for PhDs. This podcast is for PhDs and PhDs-to-be who want to explore the hidden curriculum of finances to learn the best practices for money management, career advancement, and advocacy for yourself and others. This is Season 12, Episode 7, and today my guest is Alex Parry, a sixth-year graduate student at Johns Hopkins in the history of medicine. Alex is a strong advocate for increasing stipends, both in his department and at Hopkins broadly, and is deeply involved with the grad student unionization movement. Alex and some colleagues recently released the results of a study of stipends vs. the living wage for about a dozen peer institutions to Hopkins, and he explains in detail the methodology of the study and the patterns that they found, making a case for the urgency to increase stipends at virtually all U.S. universities. Alex and I discuss the benefits of this approach vs. how PhDStipends.com collects data. Alex shares a powerful concluding message on the need for collective action among graduate students.

02:01 Emily: If you are a fan of this podcast, I invite you to check out the Personal Finance for PhDs Community at PFforPhDs.community. The community is for PhDs and people pursuing PhDs who want to take charge of their personal finances by opening and funding an IRA, starting to budget, aggressively paying off debt, financially navigating a life or career transition, maximizing the income from a side hustle, preparing an accurate tax return, and much more. Inside the community, you’ll have access to a library of financial education products, including my set of Wealthy PhD Workshops. There is also a discussion forum, monthly live calls with me, and progress journaling for financial goals. Our next live discussion and Q&A call is on Wednesday, August 17th, 2022. Basically, the Community exists to help you reach your financial goals, whatever they are. Go to pfforphds.community to find out more. I can’t wait to help propel you to financial success! You can find the show notes for this episode at PFforPhDs.com/s12e7/. Without further ado, here’s my interview with Alex Parry.

Would You Please Introduce Yourself Further?

03:23 Emily: I am delighted to have joining me on the podcast today, Alex Parry. He is a rising sixth-year graduate student at Johns Hopkins in the history of medicine. And we have a really valuable conversation coming up for you because we are talking about stipends and how to increase them, and the advocacy work that Alex is doing. We are recording this by the way in May, 2022. I know it’s going to be out a few months later. So, just for context, that’s where we are. Alex, would you please introduce yourself further to the listeners?

03:53 Alex: Sure. So, as it was already stated, I’m a rising sixth-year in the History of Medicine Department at John Hopkins. I work specifically on the history of consumer product safety and home accidents in the United States from about 1920 to 1980. And I’m also one of the organizers with Teachers and Researchers United (TRU) which is the currently unrecognized graduate student union at Johns Hopkins. So, one of many people who’s trying to push here and at other universities for increases to our stipends to accommodate a quickly accelerating rise in the cost of living.

Teachers and Researchers United (TRU) History

04:26 Emily: Yes. So, let’s hear more about that unionization movement right now. So, it’s currently unrecognized. Can you give us a little bit of the recent history, and where you’re hoping to go in the near future?

04:35 Alex: Yeah, absolutely. So, TRU has been around since roughly 2014. It started initially at the arts and sciences campus at Hopkins and was focused primarily on parental leave for graduate students as well as to try and increase healthcare benefits, particularly making sure that all graduate students had access to dental care and to vision care. Since then, the union has sort of grown and sort of formalized. And right now, we’re currently in the midst of an ongoing recognition campaign trying to basically work through the National Labor Relations Board or NLRB to try and seek an official union election at Hopkins. So, we’re hoping to basically have a unit that will encompass all PhD students at the university. So, sort of regardless of what division or campus people are located at, which is about 3,000 PhD students altogether. And we’re currently in the midst of trying to build up our core of organizers, have a lot of conversations with other graduate students at the university about things that are working for them and things that aren’t, in the hope of then sort of staging to basically a card petition with the NLRB sometime over the next couple of years.

How to Become an Officially-Recognized Union at a University

05:44 Emily: Okay. And walk me through this because my university was not unionized at the time. There was not even a movement when I was there. So, you basically gain enough support from the people who would be part of the union on campus through this card campaign. What happens next? The NLRB is involved, but then how does the university ultimately recognize the union?

06:04 Alex: Sure. So, there are sort of two main pathways to get to an officially-recognized union at a university, especially for a private university. Either the university can voluntarily recognize you, say that enough graduate students support this, that we’re just basically going to acknowledge your presence and then sort of work towards a contract from there. Most universities don’t take that path because they’re sort of concerned about having to bargain with graduate students. So, what ends up typically happening is, and this was recently reaffirmed by the NLRB over the last year or so, but if one is trying to seek an election through the NLRB, what one does is you can submit a petition to the NLRB to basically arbitrate an election at your campus when you have signatures from approximately 30% or more of the bargaining unit. Most unions will aim for a higher number than that because you don’t want to sort of rely on a third of the people at the university to 1) be a reliable indicator of how much people want a union, or 2) basically, one typically expects to have a more difficult time in the actual in-person election, which is what we’ll follow if the NLRB accepts your petition.

07:14 Alex: Because typically when you’re just signing the initial petition, you can basically do that remotely. So, people can just sign a digital card. During the actual election, typically those are done in person, which means that it’s harder to turn people out. And there, you’re looking for basically a bare majority of the voters. So, ordinarily, people will aim for more like 50% of the entire bargaining unit when they submit a petition to NLRB, and then after that, an election follows. If the election is successful, then you would then sit down with the university administration and basically negotiate directly over a contract.

Winning an NLRB Election

07:48 Emily: Okay. So, if it’s gone through the NLRB for this like official card campaign, then the university has to recognize the union at that point. Is that right?

07:56 Alex: Yeah, that’s correct. If NLRB hosts an election and the sort of proposed union wins, then the university is obligated to negotiate in good faith. So, there are various mechanisms that then both the university and then the proposed union will use to sort of conduct negotiations. Typically, they’ll have like labor lawyers and/or sort of like corporate lawyers involved. And you’ll sort of haggle over the details. A really good example of what this looks like as ongoing right now is at MIT. They’ve just won their election earlier this year. They’re currently in the midst of negotiations which started sometime late April to the beginning of this month. Those are likely to extend for another several months after this.

08:39 Alex: So probably, they won’t have a contract ratified or least put up to a vote because after you’ve had their bargaining committee come up with a contract, you then send it back to the base to all of the membership, to see if people actually approve of the contract that’s been written. So, sometime, probably this fall, maybe this winter, MIT will finish negotiating a contract, will send it back to everyone to basically vote on, and then if a bare majority approves of the contract, then that will sort of be the first contract for MIT’s graduate workers.

Shift to Stipends Advocacy

09:10 Emily: Okay. Thank you so much for explaining that process to me. One other follow-up question. You said when the union at Hopkins was originally introduced as an idea, back in 2014, they had concerns about leave and about vision and dental insurance. But you mentioned that you’re now more focused on stipends. So, were those initial concerns like fulfilled in some way over the intervening years? And why are stipends the focus now?

09:36 Alex: Yeah, both great questions. Sort of to answer the first one, most of the things that TRU has been advocating for, eventually we were able to win. So, at this point, at least at the school of arts and sciences, vision and dental, they’re not perfect coverage. I don’t want to give the impression that it’s phenomenal, but they do have paid for health insurance, dental, and vision now, as well as parental leave at the Homewood campus. So, overall TRU has been relatively effective in terms of getting sort of these smaller asks dealt with, things that are relatively lower cost, and also things where Hopkins had sort of fallen behind many of its peers. One of the reasons this campaign on healthcare had been so successful is that, one, Hopkins is a world-renowned health provider and the hospital is literally attached to the university.

10:24 Alex: So, it was kind of a bad look that people weren’t getting the kind of healthcare coverage that they needed. But the other sort of major factor there is that other universities that Hopkins considers its peers had provided much better coverage than Hopkins was. That same sort of rationale is part of the reason why stipends have now come to the fore. If you look at Hopkins vis a vis some of its peers, one, of private universities, like private R1 universities, it has one of the lowest raw PhD stipends of almost any school. If you adjust for the local cost of living, it ranks basically in the bottom third regardless of division. So if you look at, you know, engineering, stipends versus medical students stipends versus like biomedical, I should say, biomedical PhD stipends, or social sciences, humanities stipends, more or less across the board, Hopkins ranks the bottom third.

11:16 Alex: The other sort of major reason why we’ve shifted to stipends, in addition to, again, this sort of increasing gap between Hopkins and its self-described peers, is that a lot of us have been hit very, very hard by the inflation post-pandemic. And many people were also affected financially by the time that they were trying to deal with the pandemic, whether that’s in terms of childcare, inability to use research funds that people had earmarked to go on research travel that couldn’t be deferred or delayed. In addition to basically just as soon as the pandemic was starting to change to the current moment we’re in, obviously the pandemic is not over, but we seem to have entered a new way of dealing with it from public health terms and in terms of the community. Since then, rents have skyrocketed, grocery prices skyrocketed. And because of that people, who used to feel a little more comfortable with their stipend here are really starting to feel pretty significant financial pressure.

12:16 Alex: So, the other reason that we really started to push for this at the school-wide level and university-wide level is because we’ve been hearing from many of our members that people are both feeling less able to pay their bills month to month, and are also becoming more and more financially precarious. Where if someone has an unexpected expense, like a major medical bill, or like last summer my car battery died and I had to replace all of my tires all at once. That thousand dollars was, was a pretty substantial hit for me. So, these are the kind of things that we’ve been concerned about, and this is why we’ve brought this to the administration. It’s something that really needs to be addressed sooner rather than later.

Departmental Advocacy

12:54 Emily: And you’ve been speaking about you know, school-wide and university-wide initiatives, but I understand that you’ve also been working just within your department on advocacy. And I really was happy to hear the example earlier of some, I guess, some success with advancing the benefits that are offered at Hopkins. Not even necessarily through unionization, but just through bringing awareness to it. And Hopkins realizing, as you said, it’s falling behind its peer institutions. So, you know, advocacy can be successful even before unionization is totally in effect or even without that being in effect. So, not that that’s not also worthwhile, but that’s a long process and there can still be wins along the way. So, I want to hear also from you about what you’ve been doing, like in your department, specifically.

13:39 Alex: Yeah. And I hundred percent agree. Like, you know, obviously I am a card-carrying union member. I, you know, really want us to have an election to have a contract, but one thing that’s important for people to know is that sort of just the gradual growth of pressure that accompanies unionization, where you’re sort of talking with your peers, gathering together, working as a group, is often enough to get small wins. Those wins aren’t necessarily protected because you have a contract, right? And those wins are not necessarily of the degree or magnitude that one would hope for in a contract. But there is something to be said for just doing the work initially will get you somewhere and you can just get further than with unionization. So, I think it’s definitely sort of a both-and situation, not an either-or kind of situation.

14:26 Alex: In terms of what we’ve done specifically in our department. One thing that initially brought stipends to our attention even before inflation started spiraling even more out of control, is I’m part of an interdivisional working group that brings together representatives from the student government associations, the recognized ones at the university, as well as the union, to sort of talk together to share information and to make sure that everyone’s on the same page about what advocacy issues are pressing to the community. And also sort of how then to mobilize both institutional channels, talking directly to the administration and sort of like more grassroots advocacy-style channels, more militant-style organizing. So, we were having one of these conversations and realized that apparently the School of Medicine as a whole has a minimum stipend that at that point was approximately $34,900 a year. At that time, folks in my department were making $30,500.

15:23 Alex: So, we were a little bit confused and concerned about the fact that we seemed to be making $4,000 roughly less than our peers while working in the same school and, you know, being under the same umbrella. And everything we saw online was indicating at least that this should have been an across the board minimum. So, we went to our department and asked basically why this discrepancy had appeared, or why this was the case, and didn’t get phenomenally helpful answers. And so we went then to speak with the Dean of the school, Peter Espenshade, who works on basically like graduate student affairs and graduate student research at the School of Medicine. And eventually what sort of came out is that our stipends in particular were tied to the stipend of the school of arts and sciences for a series of sort of complicated and frankly not super compelling <laugh> historical reasons.

16:18 Alex: So, this kind of got us to think more about the fact that, one, not only are all graduate students at Hopkins being underpaid relative to the local cost of living, but also there are significant and often sort of inexplicable disparities between programs and departments at the university. There really is no good reason why social science and humanities students are paid less than hard science students at the school of arts and sciences, and why those students are then paid less than the biomedical science students and the engineers at this university. And then at the very sort of bottom of the economic food chain here, people at the School of Education and people at the School of Public Health have even lower stipends. And at the School of Public Health, some students aren’t even guaranteed stipends at all. In which case they have to basically perform hourly work.

17:06 Alex: So, part of what this advocacy looked like was, you know, going through institutional channels, sort of talking to both sympathetic faculty and our department chair and our DGS. Then sort of like going to Dean Espenshade, being then redirected to the School of Arts and Sciences, where we were able to basically lobby successfully both folks from my department, as well as other members of TRU and other folks at the School of Arts and Sciences to get all of our stipends increased to $33,000. So, it’s a substantial raise, $2,500, at least for my department. But it’s also still not close to enough. The estimated cost of living for Baltimore as of this previous December is over $38,000, which means that even after this raise, we’re looking at a $5,000 shortfall.

TRU Study Comparing Stipends Across Institutions

17:51 Emily: Yeah. So, you can pump your arms and say, “Okay, great! Like good job, partial win here, but like, let’s keep on going. Like, people are listening to us.” And yeah, that’s great. Okay, well, let’s talk more about this study that you did. So, I found you because of something that you shared on Twitter that got a ton of traction. So, I wanted to talk to you more about it.

18:12 Alex: Yeah. So, essentially what I and some other folks from the TRU data and resource committee have spent some time doing was, one, trying to find basically stipend figures for particularly biomedical science and social science and humanities programs at a few sort of select institutions. And then comparing those stipends with the cost of living estimated by the MIT Living Wage Calculator for a given county. And then what we did is basically to calculate the raw difference between those things, and then to calculate basically the percentage of the living wage that a stipend would cover in those areas. Some first major results, then we could talk more about method and why we did this this way and not some other set of ways. One, we found that only two schools actually did meet or exceed the local cost of living out of the set that we used. Out of our sample, only Brown and Princeton actually exceeded the cost of living. Every other institution, including big names like UPenn, Yale, MIT, and Cornell as well as Harvard, Columbia, and others, were falling anywhere from about, you know, 98-99%, so close to local cost of living, all the way down to closer to like three-fourths, like 75% of the local cost of living.

19:34 Alex: And basically, our goal here was to demonstrate that stipends, while they have risen and have been rising, one, are not keeping up with inflation. So, even though a lot of these schools have been getting somewhat regular raises, the raises have not been enough, especially in recent years to cover that inflation. And that sort of given that the MIT Living Wage Calculator is really only supposed to cover bare essentials, not sort of the comfortable lifestyle, not, you know, it explicitly says in a technical documentation that it doesn’t account any eating out, basically no savings, you know, no travel. And some of those things, at least travel, often graduate students are expected to pay for out of pocket if they need to do it for their own work. Unless they’re able to get an external grant or have access to enough research money to cover things in full, which is pretty rare.

20:27 Alex: Given all of that, it was also important for us to note that the MIT Living Wage Calculator data is supposed to be sort of a minimum standard of living that is not the poverty line. As we all know, the poverty line in the U.S. has fallen well below what is even reasonably livable in basically any part of the country. And so, this is an alternative measure, and graduate students are consistently getting paid less than that sort of bare minimum standard of living.

20:53 Emily: Yes. I also point people to the Living Wage Calculator, which is an incredible resource. It covers every county and every major metro area in the country. So, you can look up, basically depending on your family size, how much this sort of, again, just to pay for basic expenses, I’m not talking about poverty level, but just basic expenses, basic housing, basic food, basic transportation, healthcare, these kinds of things, what it would cost for a single adult. That’s what I usually reference for graduate students. But there’s also like if you have a number of children or if you have a partner, et cetera. I love referencing this, especially for prospective graduate students who haven’t yet moved to the city that they’re going to be attending and haven’t yet experienced what the costs are. This is one way to give them kind of a touch point.

21:36 Emily: But as you said, what I also very much try to emphasize to them, and I don’t want the listener to miss this, is this is only talking about necessary expenses. There’s no saving included in this calculation. There are no discretionary expenses included. It’s just to run a baseline lifestyle. And as you said, not even those numbers are being met at the institutions that you studied. I do want to sort of reiterate, because I think this was maybe missed on Twitter, but like you were only looking at, it sounded like maybe a dozen different institutions. Private institutions, R1 institutions, maybe all in the Northeast to Mid-Atlantic. Is that right?

22:11 Alex: Not just Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, but only a handful of schools for other regions.

22:16 Emily: Yeah, so like, and I just sort of know from experience that the situation is worse at other places outside of private universities, outside of R1 universities. So, even this bleak picture is sort of like the best picture of the data that probably you could have selected.

Commercial

22:34 Emily: Emily here for a brief interlude! These action items are for you if you recently switched or will soon switch onto non-W-2 fellowship income as a grad student, postdoc, or postbac and are not having income tax withheld from your stipend or salary. Action item #1: Fill out the Estimated Tax Worksheet on page 8 of IRS Form 1040-ES. This worksheet will estimate how much income tax you will owe in 2022 and tell you whether you are required to make manual tax payments on a quarterly basis. The next quarterly estimated tax due date is September 15, 2022. Action item #2: Whether you are required to make estimated tax payments or pay a lump sum at tax time, open a separate, named savings account for your future tax payments. Calculate the fraction of each paycheck that will ultimately go toward tax and set up an automated recurring transfer from your checking account to your tax savings account to prepare for that bill. This is what I call a system of self-withholding, and I suggest putting it in place starting with your very first fellowship paycheck so that you don’t get into a financial bind when the payment deadline arrives.

23:54 Emily: If you need some help with the Estimated Tax Worksheet or want to ask me a question, please consider joining my workshop, Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients. It explains every line of the worksheet and answers the common questions that PhD trainees have about estimated tax. The workshop includes 1.75 hours of video content, a spreadsheet, and invitations to at least one live Q&A call each quarter this tax year. If you want to purchase this workshop as an individual, go to PF for PhDs dot com slash Q E tax. Even better, recommend that your grad school, grad student association, postdoc office, etc. sponsor the workshop on behalf of yourself and your peers. I offer a discount on these bulk purchases. Please point the potential sponsor to PF for PhDs dot com slash sponsor Q E tax. Now back to our interview.

Resources for Comparing University Stipends

25:00 Emily: What I would love to talk more about right now is how you found the stipends. So, the Living Wage is very easy to work with, a calculator from MIT, but how did you find the stipends to compare it to at these different institutions?

25:13 Alex: Yeah, so it was not super easy. A lot of universities do not make their stipend data particularly public, which is one reason why we’ve also used data from your basically database of self-reported data, PhD Stipends, which is, you know, a great sort of way to get self-reported information about what people are making in different departments at different places. We found that when we were working with the administration to try and lobby for increased wages that self-reported data weren’t as compelling to them as having something where we could point to an official university communication. So, all the data that we’ve collected have been sourced directly from offer letters, from university websites, or from internal university correspondence. So, you know, announcements of raises, for example, that went out to a graduate student listserv.

26:04 Alex: This has its cost and benefits. On the bright side, what this means is that it’s very, very difficult or impossible for administrators or other folks who are sort of less willing to provide increased stipends to sort of just basically wave the results away as badly reported self-reported data, or as sort of potentially not being an accurate reflection of all the quote unquote benefits that accrue to a graduate student. On the flip side, it means that we were then very limited in the amount of data we were able to collect. We’re a small team, it’s about four or five of us who work on this. And all of us are obviously also full-time graduate students. So, this is kind of a spare hours what little free time we have kind of project.

26:51 Alex: And so, that’s part of the reason why, as you’d mentioned that we really limited ourselves to the schools that Hopkins like self-describes as its peer institutions, which means R1, private, mostly Northeast, right? Which also as you pointed out means that this data is looking at the schools that should in theory provide the best of the best in terms of stipends. And the data looks substantially worse if you start looking at schools that, and there are many of them, that pay closer to like $16,000 a year, in some cases, in large metro areas. So, things could be better <laugh>.

27:29 Emily: Yeah, I’m really glad you brought up, like, so my website, my database PhDStipends.com. I say mine, but I just put it up. People can use it how they want, they can enter what they want into it, because it’s, as you said, it’s all crowdsourced and self-reported. We have thought about different ways to sort of verify like what people are reporting, the way that you’ve done for your study. But as you said, it’s very labor-intensive, and you’re asking people to give up very personal information. In my case, to an anonymous website, which is like out there and what protections do they have, you know? So, I think it really does, these are like complimentary approaches, I think. Because PhD Stipends can give you kind of a starting point. And that’s all it’s really meant to be, is like the more people use it, the more people enter, the clearer the picture gets. Yeah, you’re going to have some people write in typos or like people who are clearly making things up, but it’s a starting point. And you’ve, you know, jumped off from that point and done much more in-depth verification, which is wonderful.

28:23 Emily: But as you said, the data set only get so big when you go that route because it takes so much willingness on the part of the participants to let you have access to this information and then for the volunteers to verify it. So, I love that approach you took, and I know there are some other people working, you know, with similar approaches at different universities and different fields around the country. It’s all great work. And I love it. And that’s why I wanted to have you on to talk about this, but yes, I totally can understand. Some people do use PhD Stipends for advocacy work, but I think it’s, as I was just saying, a starting point rather than like the end all be all of what the data can be.

Stipend vs. Living Wage Patterns

29:00 Emily: Are there any other patterns that you want to share with us when you were doing the study regarding the stipends versus living wage?

29:08 Alex: Sure. So, one other thing that we’ve tried to do, and this is still sort of in the early stages, we’ve only gotten a few schools’ data collected so far for this, but we’re also trying to compile some longitudinal data. So, the table at the beginning of the Twitter thread and things that I think, you know, PhD Stipends sort of attempts to do is basically primarily to give like a one year snapshot. Like this is kind of like where things were in this single year without sort of then trying to do the detailed work of trying to figure out exactly what that means when you start accounting for inflation or especially inflation and cost of living in the local area. But one thing that we’ve been trying to do with the data set is now to compile using sort of both either sort of synchronic pictures at different moments of what the MIT data look like, or using right now, we’ve just basically been using data from the consumer price index to look at inflation over time and then tracking the stipends backwards for about five to six years.

30:03 Alex: What we have been noticing is that for almost all these schools, if you look at the, at the four, five-year trend, the overall real wage is declined. So, not only is the situation now that stipends are below the local cost of living, but in fact, we were making more in real terms five years ago than we are now. So, a lot of schools have been sort of touting the fact that they have increased stipends or are trying to increase stipends either, you know, a couple years back, or even now in response to inflation, but we still haven’t even recouped the amount that we’ve lost over the last few years, let alone actually gotten to the point where graduate students are making a livable wage. So, that’s another major trend. This long-term decline is something that we want to do more research on and sort of see how consistent it is, and also try and assess this magnitude in a more systematic way.

Effect of Unionization on History of Stipends

30:53 Emily: Yes. Wow. I guess also another question that I have, and I don’t know if you’ve looked into this at all, is to see what effect unionization and unionization movements have had on that history of stipends, because I would guess that, at the point when a union contract is first ratified, there’s probably going to be a substantial jump in at least some of the stipends at these universities. Maybe they’ve been falling behind in recent years and that jump helps catch them up a little bit, but it may be these sort of not gradual changes, but very abrupt changes when certain outside circumstances like that occur.

31:29 Alex: Yeah. I mean, I think what I’ve noticed from schools that have recently gotten contracts or have been, you know, in the process of getting contracts for a few years is, typically, if you look at the year when the contract is ratified, even if it doesn’t bring them up into sort of like the absolute upper echelon of schools in terms of the pay given to graduate workers, in many cases, because there’s been a many-year delay that added to the pressure that led to the unionization campaign to begin with. A lot of those schools have a very substantial percentage raise. So, if you look at the stipend table that was on the Twitter thread, you’ll notice that Columbia is near the very bottom in terms of relation to local cost of living.

32:08 Alex: Columbia would be even further behind, like closer to, at the moment, humanities and social science programs there are paid about 75% of the cost of living for New York. Without the most recent raise, which was substantial, I think like a 10% raise or something along those lines, you’d be looking at closer to like 68%. So, it’s important to note, when sort of interpreting the effect of unionization, yeah, there are some schools like Brown. Brown is the best-paid program relative to cost of living in the country. And a big part of that is the fact that they have a very strong militant union that has done a lot of great work. But even for schools that you might turn around and say like, well, how is it then that Harvard and Columbia, which have unions, don’t rank higher? There, it’s just a factor of 1) that the cost of living in Boston and New York is so high, and 2) that they actually are getting raises that are outpacing the annual raise of other places, but because they were so far behind to begin with, those additional raises or that super added raise is only just bringing them sort of further out of the gutter, so to speak, not necessarily actually again, launching them into an above cost of living style wage.

33:18 Alex: So, those are the things I would sort of initially note. I guess the last thing I would say about this is that one other effect that we’ve seen that’s happened a lot in unionized schools that is really important is that wages tend to get standardized across the school. And what that actually means in practice is that the folks at the lowest end of the income scale get pulled up to the highest. I’ve heard concerns or rumors that graduate students are afraid that if a union contract passes that wages will “meet in the middle.” That has literally never happened in a graduate student unionization campaign. In all cases, what’s basically happened is, if schools of public health or humanities and social science students at the bottom end of the income scale, they get boosted either all the way up to where the hard science students are, or get boosted up to some arbitrarily set lower level. And we can talk more about the fact that hard science students are consistently paid more than humanities and social science students, and more than public health students. But regardless, the effect is raises for everybody, but really big raises for folks who are at the bottom.

Consideration of Non-Employee Stipends

34:23 Emily: Yeah. So good to hear. Very, very reassuring for anyone who has that concern, or like heard that rumor or anything. Something that has always interested me about these let’s say the stipends that universities claim that they pay their students, or like announcing, okay, everyone in this school is now going to be paid this baseline stipend, is that I believe it’s focused on people who have assistantships, usually. Because they are the employees of the university and that’s where the best and most consistent data comes from. But as you well know, there are many, many, many graduate students who are funded, not because of assistantships or employee positions, but through fellowships or training grants or other non-employee sources of funding. My understanding is that technically, if a union does come into place those people would not officially be part of the union when they have those types of positions, because they’re not employees, and unions are just for employees. But I think at some universities, they found a way to sort of include people who are non-employee graduate students in some of the benefits that may come about with a contract, like, you know, better health insurance, for example. Did you consider these non-employee stipends in your study at all? Or do you have any comments about how they might or might not be included in like these advocacy pushes?

35:43 Alex: Absolutely. So, it is a complicated question, sort of how external fellowships are factored into a bargaining unit effectively. Or how they would be folded or not folded into a filing union. One thing to keep in mind is that basically, if any of your revenue or any of your income is being given by the university, it doesn’t matter if you have an external fellowship, really. That seems to be the consensus that we’ve seen from previous cases. So, for a lot of training grants, especially at places like Hopkins, almost all graduate students are paid above the NRSA rate, which is basically the NIH training grant stipend level, which I think for this coming year is somewhere on the ballpark of $26,000, roughly.

36:27 Alex: At Hopkins, because most people on those grants are then paid a super added stipend on top of that to basically get them up to the School of Medicine level, we have a bunch of people who are on external money who actually would be a part of a final bargaining unit. And at least in our case, when we’re looking at School of Medicine stipends, they’re sort of equivalent across the board. There are places and there are some grants where that’s not the case, right? One of them is the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship program. Depending on what institution you’re at and how much money that’s valued at, in many cases that will come out to above whatever the university’s pay is. So, in those cases, many times during NLRB elections, those folks have been excluded, and actually they were recently excluded in the MIT election.

37:18 Alex: One thing that’s important to keep in mind, as you already indicated though, is that if we’re able to push for higher stipends for everybody, right? Then ideally <laugh> we’ll be able to push things above the GRFP rate, and/or make sure to apply external pressure to the GRFP so that it pays better as well. And obviously, our benefits are not often given through the external fellowships. Things like the healthcare access to library resources, additional research funds that are not controlled by a granting agency but are coming from your department from your institution, are still things that we can lobby for. Another thing that we’ve been pushing for at the School of Medicine that’s sort of along the same lines is to provide relocation funds for folks who are moving from other states or overseas to Baltimore.

38:05 Alex: So, those types of benefits, even if we can’t necessarily include someone explicitly in a contract, those benefits that apply to all graduate students enrolled in the program would sort of directly accrue even to those who are not sort of an official part of the bargaining unit and therefore sort of attached directly to stipend benefits. So, these are other things to consider when we’re talking about a unionization contract, we’re talking about benefits as we’ve already sort of been indicating. Stipends are one indicator and are, I think, the most important indicator, but things like healthcare coverage, access to research money, relocation money, things like childcare support. These are all also really important aspects of thinking about what a graduate student needs to survive and also sort of what is and is not made available by their institutions.

Look-Back Formula for Voting

38:58 Emily: Would someone who is, at the moment, not considered an employee of the university be able to sign a union card or vote on a contract? I ask this because at other points in their career as a graduate student, they may be an employee, and it may, you know, very well affect them at that point. But maybe at the moment those things are happening they’re not an employee. How does that work out?

39:20 Alex: Yeah, that’s another complicated question. The NLRB clearly does not think first and foremost of graduate students when they’re coming up with their policies, but they do actually have a workaround for this. The NLRB has something called a look-back formula. So, if you’re a graduate student who goes on and off of external fellowships, for example. So, just as a personal note, right? This spring I’ve been off of department funding. I’ve been using money from the Center for Injury Research and Policy at the School of Public Health. It’s internal to Hopkins, but it’s an external grant funded by the CDC. But for that period, I am not a W2 employee with Hopkins, right? When I’m teaching, I am. But when I’ve been on this fellowship and when I’ve been on, Hopkins provides to graduates in my department basically two years of what’s called fellowship funding, which essentially is just, you know, you’re paid without any TA or assistantship work requirements.

40:23 Alex: Obviously, we’re still working, right? We’re applying for grants, we’re still publishing papers, we’re going to conferences. We’re doing everything except for the teaching or assistantship stuff. So, I always find it a little funny that it’s called a fellowship as if it’s not work. We are actually still doing work, just different work, right? But the point being that, for folks who move on and off of different kinds of funding what the NLRB will say is like over the last, you know, two years or something, were you at any point being paid directly by the university? Especially if it was a W2 employee. And if the answer is yes during any of that period, you are eligible at that point to vote in the election. So, the other thing to, I guess, keep in mind along those lines is that, even if you’re technically receiving fellowship income from the university, so not from NSF or NIH or somewhere else, we’re pretty confident at this point, and again, the legal aspects of this are a little murky, but we’re pretty confident that for all those graduate students, they also count even if they’re not receiving a W2 and even if they’re not TAs or RAs in the same way that other people are. So, basically, if your paycheck is coming from the university, you can be pretty sure, or part of your paychecks coming from the university, you can be pretty sure you’d be included in the final bargaining unit.

41:40 Emily: It’s very interesting. I had not heard that update yet. So, I’m really glad that the NLRB has been examining the special case of graduate students to kind of figure out how to handle those. Because it is so common to switch on and off of external or internal or whatever, you know, employee, non-employee kind of statuses.

Best Practices for Advocacy

41:56 Emily: So, as like kind of takeaway messages for the listener, are there particular best practices that you have identified or put in place with respect to advocacy that you’d like to share with other graduate students, et cetera, who are trying to do the same on their campuses?

42:12 Alex: Yeah, I think one thing is, as we were talking about earlier, to be a little bit agnostic about sort of what approaches work. You know, you should try to talk to faculty, you should try to talk to the administration. Institutional channels sometimes will get the job done, right? However, that’s not always going to be the case. And especially when it’s something as dicey as stipends, where universities, many of them, I won’t say Hopkins is one, right? But many universities are relatively cash-strapped right now and are sort of deeply concerned about sort of their futures and how much money they have. And in situations like that, often, even if there is money out there to basically increase graduate student stipends or priorities need to be reshuffled at the level of the university budget, really the only way to do it is going to be talk to your colleagues. If you can, try to unionize and sort of work together.

43:00 Alex: I think the main thing that’s essential to both kinds of advocacy, whether you’re doing it within the institutional channels or outside of them, or some combination, is that graduate students really have to work together. You know, obviously faculty can be supportive, undergraduates can be supportive, administrators can be supportive, right? But ultimately, like our ability to get what we need as adults and as employees of these universities done is contingent on what kind of pressure we are able to bring to bear. And what data we’re able to bring to bear. And the data are only a starting point, right? They provide the talking points you need, they provide the evidence you need, they provide the ability to do the negotiations, right? But ultimately, we will succeed or fail collectively. And we will succeed or fail on the base of our ability to sort of band together to demand what we rightfully deserve.

43:48 Emily: Very strong message. Thank you.

Best Financial Advice for Another Early-Career PhD

43:50 Emily: Alex, thank you so much for this incredible interview! It’s been wonderful to have you on. Glad to hear about all the wonderful work that you and your colleagues are doing. I’d like to finish up by asking you the question that I ask of all my guests, which is what is your best financial advice for another early-career PhD? And it could be something that we’ve already touched on in the interview, or it could be something completely new.

44:12 Alex: I guess I would say to prospective students to, you know, choose wisely. Even a funded PhD does not mean that you’ll be really making the kind of money you’d be making without doing the PhD. So, you know, I think just having your eyes open about both what it means in terms of your financial future to get a PhD is important. And also, you know, also being aware that in some fields, a PhD will significantly improve your earnings potential and in others, it might not. And in some cases, it can even sort of be, frankly, a pathway to downward economic mobility. So, just think very carefully before doing a PhD.

44:53 Alex: For those who have already committed to it. And, you know, I don’t regret my PhD at all. I’ve found this a very intellectually rewarding experience and have really appreciated the chance I’ve had to both do my own research and to work with others, both on, you know history of medicine topics, but also on things like unionization. I’d say the big thing is join your union if there is one, and make sure again, to work with your colleagues. Figure out what people need to get through this degree. It’s a long slog, and it’s a very, very difficult job. But I’d say, you know, get together with your colleagues, make sure that you know, what you need and what they need, and do whatever you can to work together to achieve it.

45:33 Emily: Thank you so much, Alex, for joining me!

45:35 Alex: Thank you. That was really a pleasure!

Outtro

45:42 Emily: Listeners, thank you for joining me for this episode! I have a gift for you! You know that final question I ask of all my guests regarding their best financial advice? I have collected short summaries of all the answers ever given on the podcast into a document that is updated with each new episode release. You can gain access to it by registering for my mailing list at PFforPhDs.com/advice/. Would you like to access transcripts or videos of each episode? I link the show notes for each episode from PFforPhDs.com/podcast/. See you in the next episode, and remember: You don’t have to have a PhD to succeed with personal finance… but it helps! The music is “Stages of Awakening” by Podington Bear from the Free Music Archive and is shared under CC by NC. Podcast editing by Lourdes Bobbio and show notes creation by Meryem Ok.

This Grad Student Advocates Individually and Collectively for Higher Stipends

by

In this episode, Emily interviews Alyssa Hayes, a rising 4th-year graduate student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Alyssa is a first-generation college student who experienced food insecurity and other forms of financial precarity as an undergraduate. Now that she earns a stipend of approximately $45,000 per year and lives in a low cost of living city, she feels financially secure—and wants the same for all graduate students. To that end, Alyssa shares two advocacy approaches: 1) Ask for what you need. As a prospective graduate student, she negotiated for a top-up fellowship to be added to her assistantship stipend. 2) Share pay information with your peers across universities and use that data to collectively bargain for higher stipends in individual programs. Alyssa and her peers in nuclear engineering are currently gathering this data, including stipends, benefits, cost of living, and university and departmental ranking.

Links Mentioned in this Episode

Image for S12E5: This Grad Student Advocates Individually and Collectively for Higher Stipends

Teaser

00:00 Alyssa: I think that like all grad students should feel as comfortable as I feel in terms of my financial situation. I think that I make a fair wage, and maybe I’m biased because of my previous financial situation, but I personally have no complaints about the amount of money that I’m making right now. I feel supported by my advisor and by my department. I feel that I am valued for my labor. And I think that shows through how much they pay me. And I think that everybody should be able to feel that way about their department and about their advisor.

Introduction

00:44 Emily: Welcome to the Personal Finance for PhDs Podcast: A Higher Education in Personal Finance. I’m your host, Dr. Emily Roberts, a financial educator specializing in early-career PhDs and founder of Personal Finance for PhDs. This podcast is for PhDs and PhDs-to-be who want to explore the hidden curriculum of finances to learn the best practices for money management, career advancement, and advocacy for yourself and others. This is Season 12, Episode 5, and today my guest is Alyssa Hayes, a rising 4th-year graduate student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Alyssa is a first-generation college student who experienced food insecurity and other forms of financial precarity as an undergraduate. Now that she earns a stipend of approximately $45,000 per year and lives in a low-cost-of-living city, she feels financially secure—and wants the same for all graduate students. To that end, Alyssa shares two advocacy approaches: 1) Ask for what you need. As a prospective graduate student, she negotiated for a top-up fellowship to be added to her assistantship stipend. 2) Share pay information with your peers across universities and use that data to collectively bargain for higher stipends in individual programs. Alyssa and her peers in nuclear engineering are currently gathering this data, including stipends, benefits, cost-of-living, and university and departmental ranking. You won’t want to miss Alyssa’s powerful messages peppered throughout the episode!

02:30 Emily: Longtime listeners of the podcast will remember the interviews I’ve published with Sam Hogan, a mortgage originator specializing in graduate students and PhDs, an advertiser with Personal Finance for PhDs, and my brother. Several years ago, I told Sam how I’d heard over and over again about graduate students and PhDs being denied mortgage loans because of their unusual income sources and income history and asked him to look into the issue. Following that request, Sam actually developed quite an expertise in this area and is now the go-to mortgage originator for people with non-employee fellowship income. He even found a way around what we thought was an insurmountable barrier in the 3-year continuance requirement. If you’re considering buying a home, especially if you have non-W-2 income, I encourage you to reach out to Sam for a quote. He has a new website, which you can visit at PhDHomeLoans.com, or you can reach him on his cell phone, 540-478-5803. You can find the show notes for this episode at PFforPhDs.com/s12e5/. Without further ado, here’s my interview with Alyssa Hayes.

Will You Please Introduce Yourself Further?

03:56 Emily: I am delighted to have joining me on the podcast today Alyssa Hayes. She is a rising fourth-year graduate student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. And we have a lot to talk about in terms of like her pay and her money mindset. And I’m really excited for this conversation. So Alyssa, thank you so much for volunteering. And would you please introduce yourself a little bit further for the audience?

04:16 Alyssa: Thank you for having me! Yeah. So, I’m currently at the University of Tennessee. I did my bachelor’s degree in the same field at the University of Illinois. My current work involves like, you know, fusion engineering, specifically. I do a lot of computational plasma boundary stuff. But yeah, I guess we’re not really talking about any of my technical work today. <Laugh>

Money Mindset Up Until Starting Grad School

04:38 Emily: No, but very related to your experience as a graduate student. So, let’s take it back a little bit and tell me about sort of what your childhood’s like, and specifically how it relates to money and how that sort of developed your money mindset through your childhood and through undergrad, up until you started graduate school.

04:58 Alyssa: Yeah. So, I come from a biracial family, and my father comes from a long line of Americans in the military where, you know, his family was very like blue-collar labor. Like there wasn’t as big of a push to go to college, especially during the time when my dad was growing up in the seventies. And my mom is an immigrant from the Philippines. And her family was not extremely wealthy in the Philippines. And they came here when she was younger to pursue a better life. And she currently works at Walmart and has been for like almost 20 years and has supported my three siblings and me through retail and fast food. So, I was the first person in my family to pursue college. And we lived in an area where we had a lot of, like, there was a lot of really good funding for the school system, even though we weren’t in the nicest part of town. There were other folks who were pretty well-to-do, so I took advantage of everything that I could at that high school. And I got a full ride at the University of Illinois to pursue nuclear engineering. I didn’t have a lot of financial security while I was there, but I didn’t have to worry too much about student debt or tuition or paying fees or anything like that.

Food Insecurity in Undergrad

06:18 Emily: That’s amazing. The full ride to college, and obviously you went after it, <laugh> starting in your earlier years. But tell me a little bit about like the discretion that you had over money. Like, were you budgeting or like, how did you manage it? How did you manage what money you had above that, you know, what’s paying for tuition and room and board and so forth?

06:39 Alyssa: Yeah. So, I was first of all, extremely food insecure and didn’t realize it until I entered grad school. Once a month, I went out to lunch with like a professor who like, he knew I was food insecure, even if I didn’t know I was food insecure, and he would like pay for my food and we would like go somewhere nice that I couldn’t afford to eat at. For the most part, like there were times when like either because I, you know, couldn’t afford to go out to eat as often, but didn’t have the time because I was so stressed out to like make food from home. I like skipped meals often when I was in undergrad. I was very cheap and frugal all the time. I was constantly like thinking about like, I am hungry all the time and like bringing, like, trying to bring snacks with me. Apples were my thing.

07:22 Alyssa: I brought apples everywhere because they were so easy to just grab and then eat on the go. And then it was mostly about trying to make money to pay the bills and to pay rent. My rent, like in undergrad was only like $450 a month. But I worked a minimum wage job in the like plasma lab on campus. And then I worked as a TA as well. So that added stress onto my undergrad. I wish that I didn’t have to have worked so hard in order to like pay to live while trying to be a student. But that’s what it was like. Luckily, I don’t have any student debt now, but I couldn’t really you know, spend the money that was granted for my tuition on, you know, myself or the ability to make ends meet.

08:14 Emily: Yeah. So, I sort of misspoke or misunderstood earlier. You had a full ride in terms of the education cost, but not your living expenses. So, you were working to pay all of your living expenses.

08:25 Alyssa: Yes.

08:25 Emily: Yes. Okay. So that is a little bit like graduate school in a sense, except you didn’t have like a job that you were given. You had to cobble together like multiple sources of income, it sounds like. And there’s more management. You were probably paid, you know, less than maybe the average graduate student is. So, that sounds really stressful.

08:43 Alyssa: I had a little bit of spillover for my scholarships that I had received. So like it paid for like tuition and fees plus a little bit of extra and then like that would go towards rent, but it wasn’t like enough.

Student Loans for Dorm Payment

08:55 Emily: Why didn’t you take out student loans during that time?

08:59 Alyssa: So, I did have to take out student loans during my freshman year to pay for the dorms. Because dorms are a scam. If anyone who’s like not currently in grad school is listening to this, dorms are a scam. Do not live in them longer than you have to. The university says it’s so that way you can you know, help get acclimated to the college experience, but that’s a lie. They’re trying to take your money. I had to take out student loans to pay for those. Other than that, I didn’t take out any other student loans because I was afraid of the debt like piling up. I knew that like one of the types of loans didn’t charge interest until you were done, but the other type of loan did. And I, you know, didn’t want that to accrue while I was in college.

09:38 Alyssa: And I knew that I like had done all my budgeting and I knew that I was able to work to pay for all my stuff. So, I just kind of like, you know, I didn’t think anything was like wrong with the way that I was living. I didn’t see any like problems with like being so frugal or so cheap or skipping meals or missing sleep and stuff. But like, I guess grateful now to past me that I didn’t do that because now I don’t have any student debt. I paid off what little loans I had in like six months. But I did have to like work a lot to get there. But I was also happy doing the work that I did. I enjoyed being a TA and I enjoyed working in a research lab. And honestly, I’m glad that I didn’t end up like working somewhere that didn’t have anything to do with nuclear engineering. So that way I was able to apply all of that to my career trajectory later on in grad school, by having that research experience.

Funding and Finances in Grad School

10:36 Emily: Yeah. This kind of goes to show you like how we aren’t even aware of our own beliefs around money and our own mindsets around money until we sort of consciously try to take a step outside and examine them. And I understand that you can say now, “Oh, past me, I didn’t even know at the time.” You can say things like that because you’ve now reached a new phase in your financial life, which is the graduate student phase. So, tell us about how you’re funded now and how your finances are going.

11:00 Alyssa: Yeah. So, when I was applying to grad schools, I applied to the University of Illinois where I originally wanted to stay because I really loved working for my advisor there. And I also applied to the University of Tennessee because I had, through conferences and networking, I met my current advisor here. And I told both schools that I would stay at Illinois for less. And Illinois didn’t have the power to offer, or like the nuclear engineering program at the University of Illinois, didn’t have the power to offer me more than like the base research assistantship that they offer to like all of the graduate students there. But the University of Tennessee has these like top-off fellowships that they will add to a base stipend in order to get a student to commit to the university who’s maybe deciding between two programs.

12:01 Alyssa: And with just the base stipend, Illinois, I think pays, I might be mistaken on the exact number, but I think they were offering like $26,000 a year. And the University of Tennessee’s base pay at the time was $30,000 per year. We’ve since gotten a raise and now it’s $33K. But the top-off fellowship that was offered to me was $10,000 a year. So then it became a no-brainer. And I was like, I would stay at Illinois for less, but not this much less. And so, now I am making about $45K with bonuses and like a couple of like, you know, service-based scholarships that I get on a somewhat regular basis. So, it kind of evens out to about $45,000 a year with the raise and the top-off fellowship. And so now, I feel like more of a regular adult that has a livable amount of money and I’m not as worried anymore about like, “Oh God, I saw a movie this weekend and now I can’t do anything else fun for the rest of the week.” And so like, I don’t have any of those like worries anymore, but I do still think about them. Like that mindset is always in the back of my mind of like, “Oh, like, is this like a waste of money? I don’t need to be doing this,” or, “This is so expensive,” you know?

$45K Stipend in Knoxville

13:24 Emily: Okay. There was so much in there. So much good stuff that I want to follow-up on. Let’s take it kind of in turns. I want to put a pin in the negotiation part of it. We’ll come back to that in a moment. But let’s focus now on like again, still your money mindset. You just mentioned some of it. You don’t have to be as worried about small joys and extravagances that you allow yourself. So, you’re making about $45,000 a year. Very good stipend for a graduate student, especially in a, you know, lower cost of living area. How, like give us some context about how much that pays for. Because obviously in other areas of the country, $45K is like, “Oh, I’m barely scraping by.”

14:00 Alyssa: Yeah.

14:00 Emily: How does that feel for you right now?

14:03 Alyssa: Knoxville is very affordable to live in. When you’re going to school, like in not really a big city, but more of like a rural part of the country, that definitely helps. Although there’s definitely, you have to balance that with being a person of color, too. So there aren’t other Filipinos, like in this whole city, it seems. I haven’t met any of them or seen anybody else like that’s the same race as me. There’s also a lot of segregation here. And so like, there are parts of town that you can’t go to. So you kind of have to balance that when you’re like, “Oh, if I live somewhere rural, then that’s more affordable to live in,” but there are parts of those areas that also may not be safe for you if you’re in a similar situation.

14:48 Emily: Yeah. I’m glad that you pointed that out because it’s something that I often don’t acknowledge or that can go unacknowledged that people of color in some cases do not have all of the options available to them that White people do, or, you know, other like races. Because as you just said, there are some areas where you can’t live, you have to pay the premium to live in a different area because it’s simply not an option to feel safe, you know, paying the least amount of rent that you could or whatever. So, a very important consideration when people are choosing graduate schools to kind of, to feel out if you are going to feel safe there, and what is the university going to do to support you?

15:21 Alyssa: And while we’re kind of on this, it might also be worth mentioning the current abortion scenario in the United States. If that’s something that matters to you and you have the ability to become pregnant, like a lot of the 26 states that are passing laws that restrict your access to it may also be something to consider because a lot of those contain the rural areas where it is more affordable to attend a university there.

15:46 Emily: Another wrinkle. Yeah. We’re recording this in May, 2022. I don’t know exactly when we’re going to release this. There may be more developments between now and then. But yes, an issue that I think many of us were not expecting to have to consider when we’re choosing graduate school. So, another good point.

Prioritizing Happiness

16:04 Emily: Let’s talk more about the money though. So like, you’re able to pay, you’re able to live a more comfortable lifestyle. Your mindset is still, how is your mindset doing? Like, are you able to splurge on yourself a little bit, or do you still have some of the mindset lingering from when you grew up or your undergraduate experience?

16:22 Alyssa: A lot of it is more, I guess, in the back of my mind, but I have put like a conscious effort into prioritizing my own happiness. Not just in the way of like work-life balance, but financially to ensure that like, you know, spending money on things that make you happy is not wasted money in the same way that spending time on things that make you happy is not wasted time. And so, like I saw two movies this weekend <laugh> instead of one with my partner, because I wanted to and that helped distract me from some heavy things that were going on in my life. And that was money well-spent. Yeah, it wasn’t on a bill, but it’s something that I like, you know, put effort into not feeling bad about that. So, I’ve been dealing with grief this weekend, and I’ve been spending a lot of money, like additional money than I would in any other week on eating out a lot. Just so that way I wouldn’t have to like do household chores, like dishes or worry about cooking while I’m dealing with grief.

17:29 Alyssa: And so like, those are like, you know, that was part of like, I guess, a change in mindset that I noticed where it was easier for me to do that in my current financial scenario, like situation versus when I was in undergrad. Like I had those thoughts in the back my mind of like, “Wow, I’m spending a lot of money. <Laugh> this week alone between, you know, funeral costs and like the additional money I was spending on food.” I’ve easily spent like a thousand dollars in the last four days on not bills, but that was easier for me to accept now and probably even easier now versus like my first year in grad school, when that would’ve been a harder, like mental hurdle to get over.

18:16 Emily: Yeah. And I’m assuming that this simply would not have been an option for you in undergrad to spend in this way. It is not an option for many graduate students, either, who are being paid less. And in our prep for this conversation, you said to me something along the lines of, you know, you’re living well right now given what you’re paid and given the low cost-of-living, and you think that all graduate students should feel this way. Can you elaborate on that a bit?

18:42 Alyssa: Yes. So, currently, like I said, I make $45,000 about per year. And whenever I tell other graduate students that like, sometimes, like I try not to let it like come off as like a brag because of the low cost-of-living in Knoxville, too. But it’s more of that I obviously agree that like everybody should, you know, talk about their wages, especially to your coworkers. Because I think that like all grad students should feel as comfortable as I feel in terms of my financial situation. I think that I make a fair wage, and maybe I’m biased because of my previous financial situation, but I personally have no complaints about the amount of money that I’m making right now. I feel supported by my advisor and by my department. I feel that I am valued for my labor. And I think that shows through how much they pay me. And I think that everybody should be able to feel that way about their department and about their advisor.

Commercial

19:52 Emily: Emily here for a brief interlude. I have set a big goal for my business and our U.S. PhD community broadly. My goal is for every graduate student, postdoc, or postbac in the U.S. who is not having income tax withheld from their stipend or salary to be offered training on how to 1) estimate their future income tax liability, 2) determine if they are required to pay quarterly estimated tax, and 3) prepare to pay their tax bill or bills through setting up a system of self-withholding. I provide just such a training, which is my asynchronous workshop titled Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients. Now, some universities, institutes, or funding agencies already offer such a training, and they have no need to work with me. But others won’t allow their employees to touch the topic of taxes with a 10-foot pole, and that’s where working with me can really benefit everyone. Would you please send me an email and tell me which camp your university falls into—or if it’s somewhere in between? You can reach me at [email protected]. Furthermore, let me know if you want to take Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients for free or think that the cohort coming in this fall should, and I’ll reply with how you can help make that happen. I look forward to hearing from you! Now back to our interview.

Learning to Negotiate

21:33 Emily: I wanted to come back now to the negotiation piece. So, I think you mentioned something like, you know, you told both universities that you would accept a slightly lower stipend from University of Illinois. Tell me like, you even brought up money in these conversations. Like why were you even having conversations with the programs? What gave you the idea that you could talk about this and that maybe there would be more for you there?

21:56 Alyssa: So, part of it was because while I was at the University of Illinois, I got comfortable asking for money. One by being a leader in a lot of the different like student programs and then having to correspond regularly with the staff and the department head there. So, I knew a lot of those people well, and at one point I wanted to go to the Nuclear Innovation Bootcamp in the year 2017. And there was like obviously paying for travel flight costs. I didn’t have to pay for lodging as part of that Bootcamp, but there was also a hefty registration fee and I couldn’t afford any of that. And so, like there was no route to like ask for it to be paid for. There was no like standardized path or form that you could fill out for things to be waived.

22:46 Alyssa: So, I wrote like a little one-page request to my department saying like, this is this program. I really want to go. This is what I’m going to get out of it. Will you pay for it? And then at the very bottom, it said more information about why I may qualify for financial need available upon request. But I didn’t really like talk about my financial situation. I just explained what the program was, and why I wanted to go. And I gave that to them, and with no further questions they paid for everything. I think they even, I want to say they reimbursed my flights, but if I hadn’t bought them, they may have paid for them in advance. I don’t quite remember. But I had realized that like they wanted to support me, and that they were okay with students kind of going the outside-of-the-box route in terms of asking for money.

23:38 Alyssa: And that was when I was a sophomore in college. So, that gave me the confidence, then, when I was in grad school to ask for a higher rate or wage when I was applying to grad school. And they, unfortunately, weren’t able to do it or I don’t, you know, necessarily know all the behind-the-scenes that went on there. And sure, they said no, but I wasn’t at all reprimanded for asking in the first place. Like nothing, you know, bad happened to me. The best that I could have done was ask, even if they said no. So, I’m glad that I did. And it turned out well for me because at the University of Tennessee, I didn’t even know that there were top-off fellowships. But I got one because I was upfront with the University of Tennessee about how I would have, you know, taken the lower offer elsewhere and about how I was considering other schools and kind of in the same way that you’re like, I learned how to like negotiate a car price down from my dad.

24:36 Alyssa: So that was, I guess, a little bit of a privilege that I had because I had to buy a car to like move to Tennessee, because they have terrible public transit here. It’s kind of the whole tell the other you know, person that you’re negotiating with about this other thing that you’re also considering. Make that look nice and shiny. So that way they’ll try to give you a little bit of a better offer. I ended up also getting this laptop and all of the accessories that go with it out of the same deal with my current advisor. Like I asked them to buy me, you know, personal equipment that I could use to like, you know, be a person outside of grad school, too. Like I didn’t have a functioning laptop at the time. And so all of that got thrown in as well.

25:23 Emily: I think that’s such a powerful message, like, and I’m glad that you learned it as a sophomore in college and that you were able to then apply it in your process for applying to graduate school. Like just ask, like, just let people know of your need and let them figure out how they can best, you know, work behind-the-scenes to make that happen for you. So, you got this amazing like top-up fellowship. I mean, $10,000 is a very significant, you know, add-on to an already, you know okay base stipend. So, that sounds amazing. Just, I think this is a wonderful message for any prospective graduate students, or anybody at any stage, really just ask for what you need. Let people know, and especially like you said that you have options and this would help your decision. I think you said earlier, like it was a no-brainer to go with the University of Tennessee once they made that, you know, augmentation to their offer. So, so glad to hear that.

Normalizing Talking About Grad Student Stipends

26:12 Emily: Let’s talk more about stipends for other graduate students as well. So, I understand you’ve recently kind of entered into some conversations with peers about how we can, union is not the right word, but sort of collectively bargain or like share information about stipends. So, tell me more about that endeavor.

26:33 Alyssa: Yeah. So, normalizing talking about our wages is like step one in changing the culture around laborers. So that way we can all benefit collectively. But we kind of wanted to take this a little bit of a step further among nuclear engineering grad students specifically because by going to conferences and networking, not just with employers or other universities, et cetera, but we also spend that time networking with each other. And so, because it’s so common for grad students to kind of see the same people all the time in the nuclear engineering programs, because we’re so small, a lot of us just know each other from like all across the country. And I know that this isn’t something that a lot of other fields have the benefit of because it’s not realistic for like every electrical engineering graduate student to all know each other.

27:31 Alyssa: But at least to know somebody who knows somebody at pretty much any nuclear engineering graduate program is realistic for us. So, we got together at the most recent student conference. And we are currently building a spreadsheet that has everybody’s like gross pay, all of the things that you have to pay for that are related to your health insurance or your academic costs, your fees, and then what your take-home pay is, and then comparing all of that to the cost-of-living based on where your university is, your university’s ranking, and your department’s ranking. So, that way you can kind of compare and contrast. So that way, if there is a department that is ranked highly compared to its university’s ranking, which implies that that department has more power to maybe change the pay that their graduate students are receiving, but those graduate students maybe aren’t being paid well, then they can use the collective sheet to say like, this is where we’re falling right now, compared to how much these other similar programs are paying their graduate students. And we think that you should, you know, value our labor a little bit more and that we deserve to have higher wages. And so, use like that collective information for other institutions to bargain. So that way maybe they can get the same level of financial comfort that I am afforded right now.

29:07 Emily: This is an amazing effort. I totally commend you and your peers for like this idea, and starting work on this. It sounds like you’re in the data collection stage.

29:17 Alyssa: Yes.

29:17 Emily: Is that right? Like you’re building the spreadsheet, putting in all these different factors. I love that you mentioned like ranking of university, because I have some work in this area as well, and I just think about cost-of-living. I don’t think about like how, you know, the university is regarded or their program is regarded. So, I think that’s a really interesting like additional element. I’m not sure when this episode will come out in relation to these other ones, but I have some other podcast episodes slated for 2022 on this same issue of like sort of information-sharing about stipends and bargaining in some manner to increase stipends. So, this is wonderful and it aligns very well with that.

Health Insurance (Non-)Coverage

29:53 Alyssa: The thing that like, the one piece of information that like made it, like click in my brain where I was like, “We need to like, do something more about this and just talk about our pay,” was that one of the grad students that I didn’t even know well, like while I was at U of I, that I was just kind of like chatting with at a social at this conference told me that his health insurance was not covered. And like, mine is, like, I don’t, it’s not taken out of my pay. Like, yes, it’s like technically like, “Oh, like you could have just, you know, they could have just given me the money that they’re using to pay for my health insurance,” but like the University of Illinois’ grad student health insurance is like taken out of their pay. So, that’s like a part of like the gross pay that they advertise. And I was like, that’s not cool. <Laugh> what do you mean your health insurance isn’t covered? So then I asked to have a meeting with the department head there because I like knew him well from when I was a student there. And he actually was the one who gave me the idea. He was like, why don’t you get more of this information from other schools? And then, so we’ll go from there.

30:59 Emily: That’s excellent. And I totally agree, like in PhD Stipends as well, I have a way to enter like what your stipend is, but then like, what are you paying out of that stipend in terms of fees and tuition and whatever. And like for health insurance and other types of fees as well, like that can add up to thousands of dollars a year. So, that’s not some insignificant like, oh, it’s a $20 fee, whatever. This is a really big percentage of like that overall stipend that they’re receiving.

31:23 Alyssa: Yeah.

31:24 Emily: The other thing I’m really excited about for your project too, is like this fellowship that you received is probably one that’s offered sometimes to other students as well. So, it’s good to have both sets of information, right? Like what’s the base stipend and then, “Oh, sometimes this additional funding is available.” Wouldn’t it be great if we could pull everybody up to that level or, you know, that kind of thing? So, I just, if you aren’t already, I would definitely encourage you to include that kind of information as well in the spreadsheet. What different students are being paid, even within the same department.

31:52 Alyssa: Yeah, we did get a raise this year, which took effect about two months ago. So, because of the change in the economy throughout the pandemic, all graduate students in the nuclear engineering department at the University of Tennessee received a 10% stipend raise. So, full research assistants are now making 33 instead of $30,000 per year as the base-level stipend. Additionally, this was through the effort of our nuclear engineering graduate student assembly, which is kind of like also not a union, but a collection of just the nuclear engineering grad students. We managed to through a couple of years actually of pressure convince our department to begin covering our academic fees. So, which also kind of feels like a raise in terms of take-home pay. So, now we no longer have to pay as much and many students don’t have to pay any fees anymore for things like, you know, your basic like academic, you know, transportation fee, student health center fee, recreational fee. So, all of that is pretty much covered now.

33:02 Emily: For sure. And it makes it so much easier to compare apples to apples, right? When those kinds of fees are covered. But I’m sure in your spreadsheet you’ll be accounting for everything. So, I love this idea. I’m so excited for y’all to like move forward with this and hope it comes together in the near future.

Best Financial Advice for Another Early-Career PhD

33:16 Emily: Well, Alyssa, it’s been such a pleasure to talk with you and I’m so glad that you volunteered to be on here, and you’ve had so many really vital messages that have come through in this interview. And I’m really grateful for that. I wrap up all my interviews by asking my guests one final question, which is what is your best financial advice for another early-career PhD? And it could be something that we’ve already touched on in the interview, or it could be something completely new.

33:39 Alyssa: I had a similar question asked of me in my most recent D&D session with my friends. Just like we were talking after. And, specifically, their question was, how much of my success is rooted in like just being confident? And that applies to so much in that, like I had the confidence to ask to go to all these different programs, the Bootcamp, to different conferences. And when I’m at conferences, then while I’m there, I’m networking with all these different potential employers and powerful people, like some of my future reference letter writers are people that I’ve only ever interacted with at conferences and have no other like relationship with them. And so, by networking with those people that, you know, that’s how I met my current advisor, and that’s how he learned about my work.

34:42 Alyssa: And that gave me the confidence to then talk to him about my financial situation. And you know, even asking to go to conferences in the first place built my confidence in asking for funding and asking for a raise. And it really taught me that, I mean, the best thing you can do is to at least ask and see if, you know, people will just give you money. Because sometimes they will. So, I don’t necessarily like the mindset of, you know, just apply to everything because it also can take resources and time. But apply to the things that you can, or that you have the spoons to. And it’s a way to try to tackle imposter syndrome is to know that other people have it too, but you deserve to have the confidence, regardless of any imposter syndrome you might have, to put yourself out there.

35:41 Emily: Thank you so much, Alyssa, for those concluding thoughts. Again, it’s been great to have you. Thank you so much!

35:46 Alyssa: Yeah. Thank you! Thank you for having me!

Outtro

35:53 Emily: Listeners, thank you for joining me for this episode! I have a gift for you! You know that final question I ask of all my guests regarding their best financial advice? I have collected short summaries of all the answers ever given on the podcast into a document that is updated with each new episode release. You can gain access to it by registering for my mailing list at PFforPhDs.com/advice/. Would you like to access transcripts or videos of each episode? I link the show notes for each episode from PFforPhDs.com/podcast/. See you in the next episode, and remember: You don’t have to have a PhD to succeed with personal finance…but it helps! The music is “Stages of Awakening” by Podington Bear from the Free Music Archive and is shared under CC by NC. Podcast editing by Lourdes Bobbio and show notes creation by Meryem Ok.

Why Is My Fellowship Tax Bill So High?!

by 1 Comment

Hi! I’m Dr. Emily Roberts, the founder of Personal Finance for PhDs. I’m a financial educator specializing in graduate students, postdocs, and PhDs in their first Real Jobs. My website is P F f o r P h D s dot com. The contents of this video are for education purposes only and should not be considered tax, legal, or financial advice for any individual. This video answers the question: why is my fellowship tax bill so high?

Introduction

I’m assuming that you found this video because your tax software or tax preparer has delivered some really, really unwelcome news, which is that you owe a large amount of tax this year, perhaps $1,000, $2,000, $3,000 or even more. And you are panicked because that is a huge amount of money for a graduate student or postdoc to come up with!

This is unfortunately a very common occurrence for graduate students and postdocs whose stipends or salaries are paid from fellowships or training grants and not reported on a Form W-2.

Specifically, this video is for postbacs, graduate students, and postdocs who are US citizens, permanent residents, and residents for tax purposes who are attending a university or training program in the US. Furthermore, all or part of your income is not reported on a Form W-2. I’m going to refer to you as a “fellow” in this video, although that might not be exactly the term that your university uses.

In this video, I will explain why graduate student and postdoc fellows often face these large tax bills. I’m going to focus on federal tax alone. In the companion video, What to Do When Facing a Huge Fellowship Tax Bill, linked in the description below, I step through what you should do if you are facing a high fellowship tax bill.

In all likelihood, the reason that you have a high tax bill due is that your fellowship is taxed as ordinary income but you were not having income tax withheld from your paychecks. I’m going to break that statement down now so that you can fully understand it.

Links Mentioned

Point #1: Your fellowship is taxed as ordinary income.

Point #1: Your fellowship is taxed as ordinary income. What this means is that the federal government taxes fellowship income that you receive as your stipend or salary at the same rate that it taxes employee income.

I’m hand-waving a little bit here and making some assumptions, but this is roughly correct. I’ll point you to a resource in a moment to help you get this exactly right if you’re interested.

The general point is that your stipend or salary is subject to income tax in the same way that employee income is. That is to say, part of it tax-free thanks to your deductions, part of it is taxed at 10%, part of it is taxed at 12%, and if you were particularly well-paid, perhaps some is taxed at one or more even higher rates. These are the ordinary income tax rates.

The taxability of your fellowship income may come as a surprise to you, because there are endemic rumors running around universities that fellowship income is not subject to income tax. Sometimes even tax professionals say the same thing, although they are mistaken. Fellowships used to be exempt from tax, but that changed with tax reform in the 1980s.

If you want more discussion about the taxability of fellowships, I encourage you to listen to my previous podcast episode on the subject, titled Do I Owe Income Tax on My Fellowship?, which you can find linked in the description below.

One additional quick note is that you should not pay self-employment tax on your fellowship income. Assuming that you’re not otherwise self-employed, if you see that your tax return includes a Schedule C for your fellowship income and/or there is an amount listed on Schedule 2 Line 4, that means that something has gone dramatically wrong with the tax preparation process. It is vital that you correct that error before filing your return.

I told you a moment ago that I was hand-waving over some details about how fellowship income is taxed. Your taxable income from a fellowship might not be exactly the same as your stipend or salary. It could actually be slightly more or less, depending on your individual circumstances. If you are a graduate student and want to go really in depth with this material or are trying to correct the self-employment mistake I just mentioned, I encourage you to join my paid tax workshop, How to Complete Your Grad Student Tax Return (and Understand It, Too!), which is linked in the description below.

Point #2: You weren’t having income tax withheld from your stipend or salary.

Point #2: Despite the fact that your fellowship income is taxable, you weren’t having income tax withheld from your stipend or salary. The vast majority of universities and institutes do not withhold income tax on fellowship income.

Universities are required to withhold income tax on behalf of their employees. Employee income is reported on a Form W-2. But you are not an employee with respect to your fellowship income, so the university has no obligation to withhold income tax on that income, and the majority do not.

Here are some common scenarios that graduate students and postdocs face:

1) You were an employee, either at your university or elsewhere, in the first part of the calendar year, but then you switched onto fellowship income with the new academic year. In that case, you had income tax withholding on your income in the earlier part of the year, but it stopped when your funding source changed. Also vice versa, you could have switched from fellowship income to employee income mid-year.

2) You received fellowship income for the entire calendar year, and you had no income tax withholding during the year.

3) You had two concurrent sources of stipend or salary income, one from an employee position and one from a fellowship. You had income tax withheld on the employee portion, but not the fellowship portion. Even though you had withholding through the entire calendar year, it wasn’t enough to cover both sources of income.

I understand that you may be frustrated that your university or institute did not withhold income tax on your behalf. I wish that they all would offer this benefit. The very least they could do would be to give you a heads up that they’re not withholding income tax but that you still may have a tax liability, but I’m guessing because you found your way to this video that they did not. And I’m really sorry that you’re in this situation.

Point #3: Your tax return compares your calculated tax liability for the year with the income tax withholding that the IRS received during the year.

Point #3: Your tax return compares your calculated tax liability for the year with the income tax withholding that the IRS received during the year.

For most households in the US, their income tax withholding exceeds their income tax liability, so after they file their tax returns they receive a tax refund. That’s the excess money that they paid in through the year being refunded to them.

The opposite can also happen. When your tax liability exceeds your income tax withholding, you are expected to pay the balance when you file your tax return.

Conclusion

Now you can see why you’re facing this large income tax bill. You had taxable income, but no tax was withheld or not enough was withheld, and the IRS now expects you to pony up the difference.

After you finish this video, I encourage you to watch the companion video linked below, What to Do When Facing a Huge Fellowship Tax Bill, especially if you are unable to pay the entire bill right away.

If you would like to learn more about income tax on fellowships, I please register for my free email course on the subject, linked below. You can also find it at PFforPhDs.com/fellowshiptax. It is going to explain the previous points in even more detail and point you to lots of additional resources.

Again, I’m very sorry that you’re facing a high fellowship tax bill. I wish things hadn’t played out the way they have, but please know that you will get through this, and ultimately this will be just a small hiccup in your financial journey.

What to Do When Facing a Huge Fellowship Tax Bill

by 1 Comment

Hi! I’m Dr. Emily Roberts, the founder of Personal Finance for PhDs. I’m a financial educator specializing in graduate students, postdocs, and PhDs in their first Real Jobs. My website is P F f o r P h D s dot com. The contents of this video are for education purposes only and should not be considered tax, legal, or financial advice for any individual. This video will show you the steps to take when you are facing a high tax bill due to your fellowship income.

Introduction

I’m assuming that you found this video because your tax software or tax preparer has delivered some really, really unwelcome news, which is that you owe a large amount of tax this year, perhaps $1,000, $2,000, $3,000 or even more. And you are panicked because that is a huge amount of money for a graduate student or postdoc to come up with!

This is unfortunately a very common occurrence for graduate students and postdocs whose stipends or salaries are paid from fellowships or training grants and not reported on a Form W-2.

Specifically, this video is for postbacs, graduate students, and postdocs who are US citizens, permanent residents, and residents for tax purposes who are attending a university or training program in the US. Furthermore, all or part of your income is not reported on a Form W-2. I’m going to refer to you as a “fellow” in this video, although that might not be exactly the term that your university uses.

In this video, I will share with you the steps you should take when facing a high tax bill, both to address the current bill and also avoid getting into the same situation again next year. In the companion video, Why Is My Fellowship Tax Bill So High?!, linked in the description below, I explain why PhD fellows often face high tax bills.

Links Mentioned

Step 1

Step 1: Don’t panic! IRS agents are not going to break down your door and haul you off to jail over this tax bill. You can manage this. Take a deep breath. I’ve interviewed several graduate students and PhDs on the Personal Finance for PhDs podcast who were in this exact situation, and they all found that the IRS was pretty reasonable to work with.

Part b to this step, which I want you to keep in mind throughout this whole process of resolving your bill, is to stay in contact with the IRS. Don’t stick your head in the sand about this matter. File your return on time, respond to the letters they send you, even if you can’t pay right away. Falling out of communication is tempting, but it’s kind of the worst thing you could do.

Step 2

Step 2: Double-check your tax return. I want you to be sure that it’s correct and that you really do owe that much income tax.

I told you in the companion video, Why Is My Fellowship Tax Bill So High?!, that fellowships are taxed as ordinary income. That means that you should pay the same amount of tax on your taxable fellowship income that you would on that amount of employee income.

Use an income tax calculator like the one pictured from smartasset.com. It’s not going to be super precise in calculating your tax liability, but it should get you in the right ballpark. If you have one or more dependent children, choose a calculator that takes that into account. Enter your pertinent details.

Take a look at the calculated federal income tax.

Compare that amount to the total tax line on your Form 1040. Are they fairly close, maybe within 10%? If that’s the case, your tax return passes this quick check, and it’s likely that you do owe that large tax bill.

However, if your tax liability from your tax return is much higher, like double or more, what the calculator said, that’s a major red flag. You need to go through your return with a fine-toothed comb to figure out whether something went awry in the preparation process. I would be suspicious that your fellowship income has been confused with self-employment income.

If you are a grad student and would like to learn more from me about how to prepare an accurate tax return, join my paid tax workshop, How to Complete Your Grad Student Tax Return (and Understand It, Too!), which is linked in the description below.

Step 3

Step 3: File your tax return and pay what you can. You can wait until Tax Day if you like, but do file by the deadline. Pay as much as you comfortably can, but do not put your bill on a credit card or anything similar.

If you have existing savings, how much should you put toward this bill vs. keep for yourself? My opinion is that you should treat IRS debt, which is what this bill is on the verge of becoming, similar to how you should treat credit card debt. That is to say, keep a small emergency fund of $1,000 to 2 months of expenses, and put any cash savings above that level toward paying this bill. That means forgoing investing and repaying lower-priority debts until it is paid. If you are familiar with my 8-step Financial Framework, I would place this bill in Step 2.

If you can completely pay the bill without dipping into your small emergency fund, that’s great! You’ll still need Step 4, though, so keep watching the video.

If you can’t pay the bill in full, keep working the steps.

Step 4

Step 4: Update your budget.

Your next step is not to get in touch with the IRS regarding paying your outstanding balance, although you should do that soon. First, you need to figure out your budget for this year.

In Step 4a, I want you to figure out how to stave off a large, surprise tax bill at this time next year.

If you are still on fellowship and still not having income tax withheld from your paychecks, I actually recommend that you figure out your tax bill for the current tax year before you commit to a payment plan for the tax year that has already ended.

That starts with estimating how much tax liability you will accrue on your fellowship income in this tax year.

You can use a calculator that I made, which you will receive after registering for my short, free email course at PFforPhDs.com/fellowshiptax/. Alternatively, you can use a calculator like the one I referenced in Step 2.

Figure out how much money you will need to set aside from each of your current fellowship paychecks to pay your tax bill for the current year. Build that number into your budget.

I recommend opening a separate savings account nicknamed Tax and setting up an autodraft from your checking account into the savings account for the correct amount of money immediately after you receive each paycheck. Then, when it comes time to pay your tax bill for the current year, you’ll have the money ready. This is what I call a system of self-withholding.

In Step 4b, you should determine if you are required, in the current tax year, to make estimated tax payments on a quarterly basis.

You do this by filling out the Estimated Tax Worksheet on p. 8 of Form 1040-ES. The worksheet is a high-level draft of your tax return. At the end, it will tell you whether you are required to make estimated tax payments and if so in what amount. The payment deadlines for each quarter are in mid-April, mid-June, mid-September, and mid-January of each year. If you are required to make these payments, your system of self-withholding will keep you on track to be ready to make them.

If you would like my teaching and support in how to fill out the Estimated Tax Worksheet and handle common scenarios that PhD trainees encounter, join my paid tax workshop, Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients, which is linked in the description below.

In Step 4c, you will reassess your budget. You need that savings rate to go toward your current year’s tax bill, but you also need to know how much you can feasibly put toward your previous year’s tax bill on a monthly basis going forward. It’s vital to know the maximum that you can realistically pay to the IRS on a monthly basis for that bill prior to setting up a payment plan with them.

Specifically, there are two types of plans, short-term and long-term. If you can adjust your budget so that you will pay off your entire past year’s bill within 120 days, you can opt for the short-term plan. If you can’t, you’ll opt for the long-term plan.

Sidebar here: I said earlier that you shouldn’t put your tax bill on a credit card. That is generally speaking good advice, because the typical interest rate on a credit card is far higher than the interest rate the IRS will offer you.

The one maybe-possibly exception would be to put the bill on a promotional 0% interest rate credit card. You should only consider this if you’re 1,000% confident that you will pay the entire bill before the promotional period ends and the interest rate jumps up. Compare the fees for using such a card, if you qualify for one, with the fees and interest the IRS will charge you over the period you expect to hold the debt.

I don’t love the option of using a credit card to pay this bill, but I also don’t love you being in debt to the IRS. Either way, it’s a high-priority debt that you should strive to pay off quickly.

Step 5

Step 5: Make a plan with the IRS. Now that you know how much you can afford to pay toward your previous tax bill and whether you’re able to opt for a short-term plan, you’re ready to set up a payment plan with the IRS. Make sure that the required amount of payment is set at less than what your budget tells you that you can afford.

The best website I’ve found to help with this process is the Taxpayer Advocate Service, which is linked in the description below. It explains all of the options the IRS will give you so you can decide which is the best fit. For example, if you owe less than $10,000, the guaranteed installment plan gives you three years to pay the debt. Once you have assessed all your options, get in touch with the IRS to set up your payments. If this is your first time being late on paying your tax bill, you can ask to have any penalties waived.

Step 6

Step 6: Follow through. Pay the IRS on the schedule you agreed to, and in fact try to pay them even sooner! Again, following my Financial Framework, I recommend that you get creative with your budget to funnel as much money as you can toward your IRS debt and any other high-priority debts you may have. Consider this a financial sprint with a definite end point, after which you can take your foot off the gas a smidge.

Conclusion

I hope hearing those steps helped calm you down and show you that there is a path through this situation. You are not the first nor will you be the last graduate student or postdoc to get on a payment plan with the IRS, if it comes to that.

If you haven’t yet, I encourage you to watch the companion video linked below, Why Is My Fellowship Tax Bill So High?!, to understand how this situation came about.

If you would like to learn more about income tax on fellowships, I please register for my free email course on the subject, linked below. You can also find it at PFforPhDs.com/fellowshiptax. This will really help you if you are continuing on fellowship in the current year.

Again, I’m very sorry that you’re facing a high fellowship tax bill. It may take you some time to completely resolve the issue, but you will get through it and nothing terrible is going to happen in the meantime. The IRS is fairly reasonable to work with. Good luck to you.

Is Fellowship Income Eligible to Be Contributed to an IRA?

by 27 Comments

Update 2/22/2022: Great news! The point of this article has been fulfilled because the IRS re-revised Publication 970 for tax year 2021 to reflect the current tax code, which permits taxable graduate student and postdoc income, whether reported on a Form W-2 or not, to be contributed to an IRA.

Publication 970 p. 5 NOW states: “Individual retirement arrangements (IRAs). You can set up and make contributions to an IRA if you receive taxable compensation. A scholarship or fellowship grant is generally taxable compensation only if it is shown in box 1 of your Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. However, for tax years beginning after 2019, certain non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments not reported to you on Form W-2 are treated as taxable compensation for IRA purposes. These include amounts paid to you to aid you in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study and included in your gross income under the rules discussed in this chapter. Taxable amounts not reported to you on Form W-2 are generally included in gross income as discussed later under Reporting Scholarships and Fellowship Grants.”

The rest of this article is unchanged from its original publication date on 2/6/2022.

Believe it or not, I look forward to the release of each new version of the IRS’s Publication 970, which covers how fellowship and scholarship income is taxed. I read it thoroughly and make sure that what I teach is in line with it. However, when I opened up the new 2021 version a few days ago, I was disappointed to read on p. 5: “Individual retirement arrangements (IRAs). You can set up and make contributions to an IRA if you receive “taxable compensation” (formerly “earned income”). Under this rule, a taxable scholarship or fellowship grant is compensation only if it is shown in box 1 of your Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement.” Disappointed doesn’t really touch the depths of my feelings… I was momentarily devastated! I’ve been telling you for over two years now that fellowship income is eligible to be contributed to an IRA regardless of how it is reported or not reported at tax time. Was I wrong? Let’s explore the relevant texts. I have great respect for the IRS publications and find them very useful, but they are not the final word on tax law… the tax code is.

Further reading/listening:

Pre-2020 Status

You must have “taxable compensation” to contribute to an IRA in a given tax year. You can contribute up to the cap for that year ($6,000 in 2019-2022) or your amount of taxable compensation, whichever is lower.

Through tax year 2019, with respect to PhD trainee income, only income reported on a Form W-2 was considered “taxable compensation.”

The text from the 2019 version of Publication 970, Tax Benefits
for Education, reads on p. 5: “Individual retirement arrangements (IRAs). You can set up and make contributions to an IRA if you receive taxable compensation. Under this rule, a taxable scholarship or fellowship grant is compensation only if it is shown in box 1 of your Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. For more information about IRAs, see Pub. 590-A and Pub. 590-B.”

Similarly, the text from the 2019 version of Publication 590A, Contributions to Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs), reads on p. 6: “Scholarship and fellowship payments are compensation for IRA purposes only if shown in box 1 of Form W-2.”

This text is very clear and reflects the widely held understanding of eligibility for IRA contributions. It was very disappointing for many members of the PhD community; winning a fellowship often comes with a pay raise and therefore an enhanced ability to save for retirement, yet those recipients were barred from making IRA contributions. Keep in mind, these fellowships were taxable as ordinary income, just not considered taxable compensation for IRA contribution purposes. I didn’t like this rule, but I taught it as part of my personal finance material.

The Graduate Student Savings Act

Somehow, the plight of graduate students and postdocs who received fellowship income was heard! The Graduate Student Savings Act proposed to change the definition of taxable compensation. It was put before Congress as a bill in 2016, 2017, and 2019.

An excerpt of the fact sheet for the Graduate Student Savings Act of 2019 reads: “While fellowship or stipend income is taxed by federal and state governments, it doesn’t qualify as “compensation,” meaning that none of a student’s fellowship funds can be saved in an IRA… Many postdoctoral fellows… also receive taxable fellowship income, yet these fellows are also barred from using their fellowship income to contribute to tax-preferred retirement accounts. The Graduate Students Savings Act of 2019 would ensure that any graduate student or postdoctoral fellow who is
paid for their work or their studies can save a portion of their stipend in an IRA.”

While not using super specific or technical language, this excerpt makes clear the intent of the bill: to allow “any graduate student or postdoctoral fellow who is paid for their work or their studies” to contribute to an IRA, i.e., change the definition of taxable compensation.

Graduate Student Savings Act was not successful in being passed as an independent bill in any of those years. Then, in 2019, it was included in the SECURE Act.

The SECURE Act

The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act) is described by Investopedia as a “far-reaching bill includes significant provisions aimed at increasing access to tax-advantaged accounts and preventing older Americans from outliving their assets.” It was signed into law on December 20, 2019.

The Graduate Student Savings Act was included in the SECURE Act. Here is the relevant text from the bill:

“SEC. 106. CERTAIN TAXABLE NON-TUITION FELLOWSHIP AND STIPEND PAYMENTS TREATED AS COMPENSATION FOR IRA PURPOSES.

“(a) In General.—Paragraph (1) of section 219(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: “The term ‘compensation’ shall include any amount which is included in the individual’s gross income and paid to the individual to aid the individual in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study.”.

“(b) Effective Date.—The amendment made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.”

This expands the definition of taxable compensation for the purposes of contributing to an IRA beyond what is reported on a Form W-2. To me, this definition clearly includes taxable fellowship and training grant income paid as stipends and salaries not reported on a Form W-2.

The Tax Code (2021)

From the current Internal Revenue Code section 219 on Retirement Savings, section (f)(1) reads:

“(1) Compensation For purposes of this section, the term “compensation” includes earned income (as defined in section 401(c)(2)). The term “compensation” does not include any amount received as a pension or annuity and does not include any amount received as deferred compensation. For purposes of this paragraph, section 401(c)(2) shall be applied as if the term trade or business for purposes of section 1402 included service described in subsection (c)(6). The term “compensation” includes any differential wage payment (as defined in section 3401(h)(2)). The term “compensation” shall include any amount which is included in the individual’s gross income and paid to the individual to aid the individual in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study.”

Again, I read this as any type of grad student and postdoc salary or stipend with no clauses about being reported on a Form W-2. The language is very similar to how IRS Publication 970 describes fellowship income on p. 5: “A fellowship grant is generally an amount paid for the benefit of an individual to aid in the pursuit of study or research.”

The Internal Revenue Code does seem, to me, to reflect the intent of the Graduate Student Savings Act of expanding the definition of taxable compensation with respect to graduate student and postdoc income beyond what is reported on a Form W-2.

The 2021 Publications

Publication 970

As I stated at the start of this article, Publication 970 disappointingly has not changed its tune on the definition of taxable compensation. It says the same thing in 2021 that it did in 2019 as if the Graduate Student Savings Act had never passed.

Publication 590-A

Publication 590-A, to its credit, now has some mixed language regarding taxable compensation and fellowship stipends and salaries. I’ll compare the 2018 and 2021 versions of this publication.

The 2018 version of Publication 590-A contains exactly one reference to fellowship income on p. 6 in the section titled What Is Compensation?: “Scholarship and fellowship payments are compensation for IRA purposes only if shown in box 1 of Form W-2.”

The 2021 version of Publication 590-A contains this language on p. 6 in the section titled What Is Compensation?: “Scholarship and fellowship payments are compensation for IRA purposes only if shown in box 1 of Form W-2.” So no change there.

However, further down in the same section it says: “Graduate or postdoctoral study. Compensation includes any income paid to you to aid you in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study.”

Are they trying to draw a distinction between “any income paid to you to aid you in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study” and “scholarship and fellowship payments”? What could “any” income mean if not, at least in part, fellowship payments?

To further muddy these waters, Publication 590-A includes Table 1-1, Compensation for Purposes of an IRA. The 2018 version of this table doesn’t mention either fellowship income or graduate or postdoctoral study. The 2021 version lists “taxable non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments” as included in the definition of taxable compensation.

This language in the table is consistent with both employee and non-employee graduate student and postdoc income, again, with no mention of a Form W-2 reporting requirement.

Furthermore, the 2021 version of Publication 590-A says under the Reminders section on p. 2: “Certain taxable non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments. For tax years beginning after 2019, certain taxable non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments are treated as compensation for the purpose of IRA contributions. Compensation will include any amount included in your gross income and paid to aid in your pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study.”

I am not sure what “certain” means in this paragraph. “Non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments” reads to me as stipend or salary as long as your tuition is being paid by another source of funding. “Any amount included in your gross income and paid to aid in your pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study” reads to me as both your employee income (reported on a Form W-2) such as from a graduate assistantship position or postdoctoral employee position and taxable non-employee (not reported on a Form W-2), often sourced from a fellowship or training grant.

My Conclusion

My conclusion is that the very clear language in Publication 970 and Publication 590-A excluding taxable fellowship and scholarship income from the definition of taxable compensation unless it is reported on a Form W-2 is not consistent with the spirit of the Graduate Student Savings Act or the current tax code. The changes made by the SECURE Act to the tax code included in the definition of taxable compensation “any amount which is included in the individual’s gross income and paid to the individual to aid the individual in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study.” To me, this means that if you receive a taxable stipend or salary as a graduate student or postdoc, even if it is not reported on a Form W-2, it is taxable compensation for the purpose of contributing to an IRA.

What Do You Think?

I am really struggling with this and I honestly want to know: Do you see a flaw in my reasoning? Is there some difference between “fellowship” and “any income paid… in the pursuit of graduate and postdoctoral study”? Leave a comment here or email me ([email protected]). I am open to the idea that there is something I don’t see or understand. Or let me know if you agree with me.

What Can We Do?

If my argument is valid and the text in IRS Publication 970 and Publication 590A (in part) is incorrect, what can be done? Hit me with your ideas for getting this text updated.

My initial idea is to write to the offices of the Senators (Elizabeth Warren, Mike Lee, Ron Wyden, and Tim Scott) who sponsored the Graduate Student Savings Act to see if they can clarify why the IRS’s language in these publications doesn’t reflect the change the Act brought about. Do you have any other ideas?

The big win for our community was getting the Graduate Student Savings Act passed. The follow-through on that win is making sure that people (and tax software/preparers) know about the change so that graduate students and postdocs can functionally contribute to IRAs.

Fellowship and Training Grant Tax Forms

by Leave a Comment

There is no single correct IRS tax form on which to report PhD trainee fellowship and training grant stipends and salaries. Universities and funding agencies take different approaches, which often confuses grad students, postdocs, and postbacs. This article shares the crowd-sourced information on how universities and funding agencies are reporting fellowship and training grant income.

Please contribute to this project by filling out this survey to have your tax form included in this article—and share the survey as well.

I have included the number of entries that I’ve received for each type of tax form.

Further reading:

Tax Year 2024 Survey Results

External Fellowships

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Continuing Education Training Grant (T15)

The T15 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry)

Intramural Research Program: Postdoctoral Research Training Award (IRTA)

The postdoc IRTA has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-G in Box 6 (1 entry)

Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award (T32)

The T32 has been reported on a:

  • Courtesy letter (2 entries)
  • W-2 (1 entry)

Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F31)

The F31 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-MISC Box 3 (2 entries)

It has also been not reported in any way (1 entry)

Linked Training Award (TL1)

The TL1 has not been reported in any way (1 entry)

National Science Foundation

Research and Mentoring for Postbaccalaureates in Biological Sciences (RaMP)

The RaMP has been reported on a:

  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

Graduate Research Fellowships Program (GRFP)

The GRFP has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (2 entries)
  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

It has also been not reported in any way (2 entries)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST)

The FINESST has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry)

It has also been not reported in any way (1 entry)

American Institute of Indian Studies

Junior Fellowship

The Junior Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry)

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Occupational Health Psychology Total Worker Program

The Occupational Health Psychology Total Worker Program funding has not been reported in any way (1 entry)

Internal Fellowships

Harvard University

Funding (stipend) for doctoral students still in coursework has not been reported in any way (1 entry – told to use paystub for reporting to IRS)

Northwestern University

The First-Year Fellowship was reported on a courtesy letter (1 entry – letter was requested by recipient).

Stanford University

Funding (stipend) for doctoral students has been reported on Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry).

University of Connecticut

The Jorgensen Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

University of Pennsylvania

The Educational Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

Vanderbilt University

Funding (stipend) for doctoral students has been reported on Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry).

Non-tuition scholarship awards (e.g., health insurance, health fee award) have been reported on Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry).

Tax Year 2023 Survey Results

External Fellowships

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Dissertation Award (R36)

The R36 has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

Intramural Research Program: Postdoctoral Research Training Award (IRTA)

The postdoc IRTA has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-NEC Box 1 (1 entry)

Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award (T32)

The T32 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (3 entries)

It has also been not reported in any way (2 entries).

Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F31)

The F31 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (2 entries)
  • Form 1099-MISC Box 3 (1 entry)

National Science Foundation

Graduate Research Fellowships Program (GRFP)

The GRFP has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T Box 5 (2 entries)
  • Form W-2 (1 entry)

It has also been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Internal Fellowships

Harvard University

The Prize Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

Funding (stipend) for doctoral students has been reported on Form 1099-MISC Box 3 (1 entry).

Ohio State University

The Presidential Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

Smithsonian Institution

The postdoctoral Smithsonian Institution Fellowship Program (SIFP) has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

University of Nevada, Reno

The Bilinski Fellowship has been reported on Form 1098-T Box 5 (1 entry).

University of Virginia

The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Dean’s Doctoral Fellowship has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

A graduate research assistantship position has not been reported in any way (1 entry).

The Raven Fellowship has been reported on Form 1099-MISC Box 3 (1 entry).

Tax Year 2021 Survey Results

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award (T32)

The T32 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T in Box 5 (5 entries)
  • Courtesy letter (3 entries)

It has also been not reported in any way (3 entries).

Ruth L. Kirschstein Individual Predoctoral NRSA for MD/PhD and other Dual Degree Fellowships (F30)

The F30 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T in Box 5 + Form W-2 in Box 14 (1 entry)

Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F31)

The F31 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T in Box 5 (2 entries)
  • Form W-2 in Box 1 (1 entry)

It has also been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Ruth L. Kirschstein Postdoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F32)

The F32 has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Individual Predoctoral to Postdoctoral Fellow Transition Award (F99/K00)

The F99/K00 has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Intramural Research Program: Postdoctoral Research Training Award (IRTA)

The postdoc IRTA has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-G in Box 6 (1 entry)

NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program

The Oxford-Cambridge Scholarship has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-G in Box 6 (1 entry)

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program TL1

The CTSA TL1 has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-MISC in Box 3 (2 entries)

Clinical Connections-Connecticut (CNC-CT)

The CNC-CT has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Molecular Biophysics Training Grant

The Molecular Biophysics Training Grant has bee reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T in Box 5 (1 entry)

National Science Foundation (NSF)

Graduate Research Fellowships Program (GRFP)

The GRFP has been reported on a:

  • Form 1098-T in Box 5 (13 entries)
  • Form W-2 Box 1 (1 entry)
  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

It has also been not reported in any way (5 entries).

Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology (PRFB)

The PRFB has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Department of Energy (DoE)

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship

The NNSA Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship from the Krell Institute has been reported on a:

  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

Department of Defense (DoD)

National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG)

The NDSEG has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-NEC in Box 1 (1 entry)
  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART)

The SMART Scholarship has been reported on a:

  • Form 1099-MISC Box 3 (1 entry)

The National Academies

Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship

The Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship has been reported on a:

  • Courtesy letter (1 entry)

Henry Luce Foundation

Clare Boothe Luce Fellowship

The CBL Fellowship has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Simons Foundation

The Simons Postdoctoral Fellowship has been reported on a courtesy letter (1 entry).

Internal Fellowships

Cornell University

A fellowship for first-year rotating students has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5.

Harvard University

The Prize Fellowship has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Indiana University

The University fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5 (1 entry).

Mayo Clinic

The Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research Fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5 + Form 1099-MISC in Box 3 (1 entry).

Rochester Institute of Technology

A graduate research assistantship position has been reported on a Form 1099-MISC in Box 3.

University of California, Berkeley

The Chancellor’s Fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5.

University of California, San Diego

The Summer Training Academy for Research Success (STARS) Fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5 and a courtesy letter (1 entry).

University of Connecticut

The Jorgensen Fellowship has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

University of Michigan

The Rackham Merit Fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5 (1 entry).

University of Pennsylvania

The Dean’s Fellowship in the Graduate School of Education has been reported on a Form W-2 in Box 1 (1 entry).

University of Southern California

The Merit Fellowship has been reported on a Form 1098-T in Box 5 (1 entry).

University of Virginia

The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Dean’s Doctoral Fellowship has been not reported in any way (1 entry).

Washington University in St. Louis

The WM Keck Postdoctoral Fellowship has been reported on a courtesy letter (1 entry).

Please contribute to this project by filling out this survey to have your tax form included in this article—and share the survey as well.

Want more tax content specific to graduate students, postdocs, and postbacs?

Visit the Personal Finance for PhDs Tax Center.

Workshop: How to Complete Your Grad Student Tax Return (and Understand It, Too!)

Workshop: Quarterly Estimated Tax for Fellowship Recipients